Super League Women — Failed To Score
South-Africa · 2026
Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | FTS% | Home% | Away% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Diepkloof W | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 |  Stellenbosch W | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 |  City Lads W | 3 | 2 | 67% | 50% | 100% |
| 4 |  First Touch W | 3 | 2 | 67% | 50% | 100% |
| 5 |  Richmond United W | 3 | 2 | 67% | 100% | 50% |
| 6 |  TS Galaxy W | 3 | 2 | 67% | 100% | 50% |
| 7 |  Ezemvelo W | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 50% |
| 8 |  JVW FC W | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 50% |
| 9 |  Ramatlaohle W | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 100% |
| 10 |  Tshwane University W | 3 | 1 | 33% | 100% | 0% |
| 11 |  University of Fort Hare W | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 50% |
| 12 |  University of Johannesburg W | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% |
| 13 |  Mamelodi Sundowns W | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 14 |  UWC Ladies | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 15 |  Copperbelt Ladies W | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 |  Pretoria U. W | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Home / Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Diepkloof W | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 2 | Richmond United W | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 3 | Stellenbosch W | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 4 | TS Galaxy W | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 5 | Tshwane University W | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 6 | City Lads W | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 7 | First Touch W | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 8 | University of Johannesburg W | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 9 | Mamelodi Sundowns W | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 10 | UWC Ladies | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 11 | Copperbelt Ladies W | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 12 | Ezemvelo W | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 13 | JVW FC W | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 14 | Pretoria U. W | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 15 | Ramatlaohle W | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 | University of Fort Hare W | 1 | 0 | 0% |
Away / Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City Lads W | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 2 | Diepkloof W | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 3 | First Touch W | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 4 | Ramatlaohle W | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 5 | Stellenbosch W | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 6 | Ezemvelo W | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 7 | JVW FC W | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 8 | Richmond United W | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 9 | TS Galaxy W | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 10 | University of Fort Hare W | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 11 | Mamelodi Sundowns W | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 12 | UWC Ladies | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 13 | Copperbelt Ladies W | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 14 | Pretoria U. W | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 15 | Tshwane University W | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 | University of Johannesburg W | 1 | 0 | 0% |
Which teams fail to score most often?
Diepkloof W fails to score most often in the league — 100%
Stellenbosch W is #2 for failed-to-score rate — 100%
City Lads W is #3 for failed-to-score rate — 67%
Pretoria U. W rarely fails to score — 0%
UWC Ladies rarely fails to score — 0%
University of Johannesburg W rarely fails to score — 33%
League Blank Stats
- consists of 14 teams
- League failed-to-score rate: 48%
- Home FTS rate: 43%
- Away FTS rate: 52%
Super League Women (South-Africa) — Failed To Score Analysis
In the Super League Women (South-Africa), teams fail to score in 95% of matches this season. Diepkloof W fails to score the most, going blank in 100% of their games (3 matches), with 100% at home and 100% away. Pretoria U. W has the most reliable attack, failing to score in only 0% of games.
Betting Angle — Low-Scoring Markets
A high failed-to-score rate is a strong signal for BTTS No, Under 1.5, and Clean Sheet markets when facing that team. When two high-FTS teams play each other, the Under 1.5 and even the 0-0 Correct Score become statistically viable bets.
Statistics Tables — South-Africa
- 1st Division Failed To Score— Division Underground
- 8 Cup Failed To Score— Division Pro
- Cup Failed To Score— Division Pro
- Diski Challenge Failed To Score— Division Underground
- Diski Shield Failed To Score— Division Underground
- League Cup Failed To Score— Division Pro
- Premier Soccer League Failed To Score— Division Pro