Chatham Cup — Goals Conceded
New-Zealand · 2026
Goals Conceded
| # | Team | MP | Total | /Game | Home | Away | Home Adv% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Melville United | 1 | 1 | 1.00 | 1 | 0 | -100% |
| 2 |  Cashmere Technical | 3 | 2 | 0.67 | 2 | 0 | -100% |
| 3 |  Fencibles United | 3 | 2 | 0.67 | 2 | 0 | -100% |
| 4 |  Miramar | 2 | 3 | 1.50 | 0 | 3 | +100% |
| 5 |  Auckland City | 2 | 3 | 1.50 | 0 | 3 | +100% |
| 6 |  Auckland United | 2 | 3 | 1.50 | 1 | 2 | +33% |
| 7 |  Takapuna | 1 | 3 | 3.00 | 0 | 3 | +100% |
| 8 |  Cambridge | 1 | 3 | 3.00 | 0 | 3 | +100% |
| 9 |  South Auckland Rangers | 1 | 3 | 3.00 | 0 | 3 | +100% |
| 10 |  Island Bay | 1 | 3 | 3.00 | 3 | 0 | -100% |
| 11 |  Napier City Rovers | 3 | 4 | 1.33 | 0 | 4 | +100% |
| 12 |  Nelson Suburbs | 3 | 4 | 1.33 | 1 | 3 | +71% |
| 13 |  Petone | 1 | 4 | 4.00 | 4 | 0 | -100% |
| 14 |  Hibiscus Coast | 2 | 5 | 2.50 | 5 | 0 | -100% |
| 15 |  Northern AFC | 1 | 5 | 5.00 | 0 | 5 | +100% |
| 16 |  Dunedin City Royals | 1 | 9 | 9.00 | 9 | 0 | -100% |
Home / Goals Conceded
| # | Team | MP | ⊕ Conceded | Ø AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dunedin City Royals | 1 | 9 | 9.00 |
| 2 | Hibiscus Coast | 1 | 5 | 5.00 |
| 3 | Petone | 1 | 4 | 4.00 |
| 4 | Island Bay | 1 | 3 | 3.00 |
| 5 | Auckland United | 1 | 1 | 1.00 |
| 6 | Cashmere Technical | 2 | 2 | 1.00 |
| 7 | Melville United | 1 | 1 | 1.00 |
| 8 | Fencibles United | 3 | 2 | 0.67 |
| 9 | Nelson Suburbs | 2 | 1 | 0.50 |
| 10 | Auckland City | 1 | 0 | 0.00 |
Away / Goals Conceded
| # | Team | MP | ⊕ Conceded | Ø AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Northern AFC | 1 | 5 | 5.00 |
| 2 | Auckland City | 1 | 3 | 3.00 |
| 3 | Takapuna | 1 | 3 | 3.00 |
| 4 | Nelson Suburbs | 1 | 3 | 3.00 |
| 5 | Cambridge | 1 | 3 | 3.00 |
| 6 | South Auckland Rangers | 1 | 3 | 3.00 |
| 7 | Auckland United | 1 | 2 | 2.00 |
| 8 | Miramar | 2 | 3 | 1.50 |
| 9 | Napier City Rovers | 3 | 4 | 1.33 |
| 10 | Cashmere Technical | 1 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 11 | Hibiscus Coast | 1 | 0 | 0.00 |
1st Half — Goals Conceded
| # | Team | MP | ⊕ Conceded | Ø AVG | Home Ø | Away Ø |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Napier City Rovers | 3 | 3 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 2 | Nelson Suburbs | 3 | 3 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 2.00 |
| 3 | Cashmere Technical | 3 | 1 | 0.33 | 0.50 | 0.00 |
| 4 | Fencibles United | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Home / 1st Half Conceded
| # | Team | MP | ⊕ Conceded | Ø AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cashmere Technical | 2 | 1 | 0.50 |
| 2 | Nelson Suburbs | 2 | 1 | 0.50 |
| 3 | Fencibles United | 3 | 0 | 0.00 |
Away / 1st Half Conceded
| # | Team | MP | ⊕ Conceded | Ø AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nelson Suburbs | 1 | 2 | 2.00 |
| 2 | Napier City Rovers | 3 | 3 | 1.00 |
| 3 | Cashmere Technical | 1 | 0 | 0.00 |
1st Half Defensive Insights
Napier City Rovers concedes most in 1H — 1.00 conceded/game
Nelson Suburbs is #2 conceded 1H — 1.00 conceded/game
Cashmere Technical is #3 conceded 1H — 0.33 conceded/game
Fencibles United has the tightest 1H defence — 0.00 conceded/game
Cashmere Technical has the tightest 1H defence — 0.33 conceded/game
Nelson Suburbs has the tightest 1H defence — 1.00 conceded/game
1ST HALF DEF. STATS
- 4 teams
- 1H conceded avg: 0.58 conceded/game
- Home conceded 1H: 0.29 conceded/game
- Away conceded 1H: 1.00 conceded/game
- Teams avg ≥0.5 conceded 1H: 50% (2/4)
2nd Half — Goals Conceded
| # | Team | MP | ⊕ Conceded | Ø AVG | Home Ø | Away Ø |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fencibles United | 3 | 2 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.00 |
| 2 | Napier City Rovers | 3 | 1 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 0.33 |
| 3 | Cashmere Technical | 3 | 1 | 0.33 | 0.50 | 0.00 |
| 4 | Nelson Suburbs | 3 | 1 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
Home / 2nd Half Conceded
| # | Team | MP | ⊕ Conceded | Ø AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fencibles United | 3 | 2 | 0.67 |
| 2 | Cashmere Technical | 2 | 1 | 0.50 |
| 3 | Nelson Suburbs | 2 | 0 | 0.00 |
Away / 2nd Half Conceded
| # | Team | MP | ⊕ Conceded | Ø AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nelson Suburbs | 1 | 1 | 1.00 |
| 2 | Napier City Rovers | 3 | 1 | 0.33 |
| 3 | Cashmere Technical | 1 | 0 | 0.00 |
2nd Half Defensive Insights
Fencibles United concedes most in 2H — 0.67 conceded/game
Napier City Rovers is #2 conceded 2H — 0.33 conceded/game
Cashmere Technical is #3 conceded 2H — 0.33 conceded/game
Nelson Suburbs has the tightest 2H defence — 0.33 conceded/game
Cashmere Technical has the tightest 2H defence — 0.33 conceded/game
Napier City Rovers has the tightest 2H defence — 0.33 conceded/game
2ND HALF DEF. STATS
- 4 teams
- 2H conceded avg: 0.42 conceded/game
- Home conceded 2H: 0.43 conceded/game
- Away conceded 2H: 0.40 conceded/game
- Teams avg ≥0.5 conceded 2H: 0% (0/4)
Chatham Cup (New-Zealand) — Goals Conceded Analysis
Teams in the Chatham Cup (New-Zealand) concede an average of 1.00 goals per game this season. Cashmere Technical has the best defence, conceding only 2 goals (0.67/game), with 2 at home and 0 away. Nelson Suburbs has the most porous defence with 4 goals conceded (1.33/game).
Betting Angle — Defence Strength
A low goals-conceded average is a key indicator for Clean Sheet, Under 2.5, and Asian Handicap markets. Teams with a strong home defence and a weak away defence create value in venue-specific markets — always check the split before betting.
Statistics Tables — New-Zealand
- National League - Central Goals Conceded— Division Underground
- National League - Championship - Final Goals Conceded— Division Underground
- National League - National Goals Conceded— Division Underground
- National League - Northern Goals Conceded— Division Underground
- National League - Southern Goals Conceded— Division Underground
- Premiership Goals Conceded— Division Underground