Chatham Cup — 1st Half Table
New-Zealand · 2026
Leader:Fencibles United — 9ptsLeague Avg:1.53 goals
Highest Avg:Dunedin City Royals (4.00)
Lowest Avg:Cambridge (0.00)Overall / Half-Time Table
| # | Team | MP | W-D-L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 (HT) | PPG (HT) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fencibles United | 3 | 3-0-0 | 6 | 0 | +6 | 9 | WWW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 2 |  Cashmere Technical | 3 | 2-1-0 | 6 | 1 | +5 | 7 | DWW | 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 2.33 |
| 3 |  Napier City Rovers | 3 | 2-1-0 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 7 | DWW | 2.33 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 3.00 |
| 4 |  Auckland United | 2 | 1-1-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 5 |  Miramar | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 6 |  Nelson Suburbs | 3 | 1-0-2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 | LLW | 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | 67% | 0% | 1.67 |
| 7 | Cambridge | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 8 |  Melville United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 9 |  Takapuna | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 10 |  Hibiscus Coast | 2 | 0-1-1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 3.00 |
| 11 |  Auckland City | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 12 |  Island Bay | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 13 |  Petone | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 14 |  Northern AFC | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 15 |  South Auckland Rangers | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 16 | Dunedin City Royals | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
Chatham Cup 2026 — Half-Time Table
Fencibles United leads the Chatham Cup first half table overall with 9 points from 3 games (3W-0D-0L), averaging 2.00 goals per game.
Cashmere Technical follows in second place with 7 points. The league average at first half overall is 1.53 goals per game, with Dunedin City Royals recording the highest average at 4.00.
Leader:Fencibles United — 9ptsLeague Avg:1.7 goalsHighest Avg:Hibiscus Coast (6.00)Lowest Avg:Auckland United (0.00)Home / Half-Time Table
| # | Team | MP | W-D-L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 (HT) | PPG (HT) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fencibles United | 3 | 3-0-0 | 6 | 0 | +6 | 9 | WWW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 2 | Cashmere Technical | 2 | 1-1-0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 3 | Nelson Suburbs | 2 | 1-0-1 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 4 | Auckland United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 5 | Melville United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 6 | Auckland City | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 7 | Island Bay | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 8 | Petone | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 9 | Hibiscus Coast | 1 | 0-0-1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 6.00 |
| 10 | Dunedin City Royals | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
Chatham Cup 2026 — Home Half-Time Table
Fencibles United leads the Chatham Cup first half table at home with 9 points from 3 games (3W-0D-0L), averaging 2.00 goals per game.
Cashmere Technical follows in second place with 4 points. The league average at first half at home is 1.70 goals per game, with Hibiscus Coast recording the highest average at 6.00.
Leader:Napier City Rovers — 7ptsLeague Avg:1.55 goalsHighest Avg:Cashmere Technical (4.00)Lowest Avg:Takapuna (0.00)Away / Half-Time Table
| # | Team | MP | W-D-L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 (HT) | PPG (HT) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Napier City Rovers | 3 | 2-1-0 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 7 | DWW | 2.33 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 3.00 |
| 2 | Cashmere Technical | 1 | 1-0-0 | 4 | 0 | +4 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
| 3 | Auckland United | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 4 | Miramar | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 5 | Takapuna | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 6 | Cambridge | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 7 | Hibiscus Coast | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 8 | Northern AFC | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 9 | South Auckland Rangers | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 10 | Auckland City | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 11 | Nelson Suburbs | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
Chatham Cup 2026 — Away Half-Time Table
Napier City Rovers leads the Chatham Cup first half table away with 7 points from 3 games (2W-1D-0L), averaging 3.00 goals per game.
Cashmere Technical follows in second place with 3 points. The league average at first half away is 1.55 goals per game, with Cashmere Technical recording the highest average at 4.00.