League Two — Beide Teams Treffen
China · 2026
Beide Teams Treffen (BTTS)
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | BTTS% | Heim% | Ausw.% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27 | 18 | 67% | 57% | 77% | |
| 2 | 28 | 17 | 61% | 64% | 57% | |
| 3 | 27 | 15 | 56% | 69% | 43% | |
| 4 | 28 | 15 | 54% | 71% | 36% | |
| 5 | 27 | 14 | 52% | 54% | 50% | |
| 6 | 27 | 14 | 52% | 46% | 57% | |
| 7 | 28 | 14 | 50% | 43% | 57% | |
| 8 | 28 | 14 | 50% | 36% | 64% | |
| 9 | 27 | 13 | 48% | 46% | 50% | |
| 10 | 27 | 13 | 48% | 36% | 62% | |
| 11 | 27 | 13 | 48% | 46% | 50% | |
| 12 | 28 | 13 | 46% | 57% | 36% | |
| 13 | 28 | 13 | 46% | 71% | 21% | |
| 14 | 28 | 13 | 46% | 57% | 36% | |
| 15 | 27 | 12 | 44% | 29% | 62% | |
| 16 | 28 | 12 | 43% | 43% | 43% | |
| 17 | 28 | 12 | 43% | 43% | 43% | |
| 18 | 28 | 12 | 43% | 21% | 64% | |
| 19 | 27 | 11 | 41% | 36% | 46% | |
| 20 | 28 | 11 | 39% | 71% | 7% | |
| 21 | 27 | 10 | 37% | 36% | 38% | |
| 22 | 28 | 9 | 32% | 29% | 36% | |
| 23 | 28 | 8 | 29% | 21% | 36% | |
| 24 | 28 | 8 | 29% | 21% | 36% |
Heim / BTTS
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | 10 | 71% | |
| 2 | 14 | 10 | 71% | |
| 3 | 14 | 10 | 71% | |
| 4 | 13 | 9 | 69% | |
| 5 | 14 | 9 | 64% | |
| 6 | 14 | 8 | 57% | |
| 7 | 14 | 8 | 57% | |
| 8 | 14 | 8 | 57% | |
| 9 | 13 | 7 | 54% | |
| 10 | 13 | 6 | 46% | |
| 11 | 13 | 6 | 46% | |
| 12 | 13 | 6 | 46% | |
| 13 | 14 | 6 | 43% | |
| 14 | 14 | 6 | 43% | |
| 15 | 14 | 6 | 43% | |
| 16 | 14 | 5 | 36% | |
| 17 | 14 | 5 | 36% | |
| 18 | 14 | 5 | 36% | |
| 19 | 14 | 5 | 36% | |
| 20 | 14 | 4 | 29% | |
| 21 | 14 | 4 | 29% | |
| 22 | 14 | 3 | 21% | |
| 23 | 14 | 3 | 21% | |
| 24 | 14 | 3 | 21% |
Ausw. / BTTS
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | 10 | 77% | |
| 2 | 14 | 9 | 64% | |
| 3 | 14 | 9 | 64% | |
| 4 | 13 | 8 | 62% | |
| 5 | 13 | 8 | 62% | |
| 6 | 14 | 8 | 57% | |
| 7 | 14 | 8 | 57% | |
| 8 | 14 | 8 | 57% | |
| 9 | 14 | 7 | 50% | |
| 10 | 14 | 7 | 50% | |
| 11 | 14 | 7 | 50% | |
| 12 | 13 | 6 | 46% | |
| 13 | 14 | 6 | 43% | |
| 14 | 14 | 6 | 43% | |
| 15 | 14 | 6 | 43% | |
| 16 | 13 | 5 | 38% | |
| 17 | 14 | 5 | 36% | |
| 18 | 14 | 5 | 36% | |
| 19 | 14 | 5 | 36% | |
| 20 | 14 | 5 | 36% | |
| 21 | 14 | 5 | 36% | |
| 22 | 14 | 5 | 36% | |
| 23 | 14 | 3 | 21% | |
| 24 | 14 | 1 | 7% |
Welche Teams haben die meisten BTTS-Spiele?
Shanghai Second hat die höchste BTTS-Rate der Liga — 67%
BIT ist #2 bei der BTTS-Rate — 61%
Nantong Haimen Codion ist #3 bei der BTTS-Rate — 56%
Rizhao Yuqi hat eine der niedrigsten BTTS-Raten — 29%
Xi'an Ronghai hat eine der niedrigsten BTTS-Raten — 29%
Guizhou Zhucheng hat eine der niedrigsten BTTS-Raten — 32%
Liga BTTS-Statistiken
- hat 24 Teams
- Liga BTTS-Quote: 46%
- Heim BTTS-Quote: 46%
- Ausw. BTTS-Quote: 46%
1. Halbzeit — BTTS-Quote
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % | Heim% | Ausw.% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27 | 10 | 37% | 38% | 36% | |
| 2 | 27 | 8 | 30% | 15% | 43% | |
| 3 | 27 | 8 | 30% | 29% | 31% | |
| 4 | 28 | 7 | 25% | 21% | 29% | |
| 5 | 28 | 7 | 25% | 36% | 14% | |
| 6 | 28 | 7 | 25% | 7% | 43% | |
| 7 | 27 | 6 | 22% | 21% | 23% | |
| 8 | 27 | 5 | 19% | 14% | 23% | |
| 9 | 28 | 5 | 18% | 14% | 21% | |
| 10 | 28 | 5 | 18% | 29% | 7% | |
| 11 | 27 | 4 | 15% | 15% | 14% | |
| 12 | 28 | 4 | 14% | 21% | 7% | |
| 13 | 28 | 4 | 14% | 14% | 14% | |
| 14 | 27 | 3 | 11% | 23% | 0% | |
| 15 | 28 | 3 | 11% | 14% | 7% | |
| 16 | 27 | 3 | 11% | 7% | 15% | |
| 17 | 28 | 3 | 11% | 7% | 14% | |
| 18 | 28 | 3 | 11% | 14% | 7% | |
| 19 | 27 | 2 | 7% | 8% | 7% | |
| 20 | 27 | 2 | 7% | 0% | 15% | |
| 21 | 28 | 1 | 4% | 7% | 0% | |
| 22 | 28 | 1 | 4% | 7% | 0% | |
| 23 | 28 | 1 | 4% | 7% | 0% | |
| 24 | 28 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Heim / BTTS 1H
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | 5 | 38% | |
| 2 | 14 | 5 | 36% | |
| 3 | 14 | 4 | 29% | |
| 4 | 14 | 4 | 29% | |
| 5 | 13 | 3 | 23% | |
| 6 | 14 | 3 | 21% | |
| 7 | 14 | 3 | 21% | |
| 8 | 14 | 3 | 21% | |
| 9 | 13 | 2 | 15% | |
| 10 | 13 | 2 | 15% | |
| 11 | 14 | 2 | 14% | |
| 12 | 14 | 2 | 14% | |
| 13 | 14 | 2 | 14% | |
| 14 | 14 | 2 | 14% | |
| 15 | 14 | 2 | 14% | |
| 16 | 13 | 1 | 8% | |
| 17 | 14 | 1 | 7% | |
| 18 | 14 | 1 | 7% | |
| 19 | 14 | 1 | 7% | |
| 20 | 14 | 1 | 7% | |
| 21 | 14 | 1 | 7% | |
| 22 | 14 | 1 | 7% | |
| 23 | 14 | 0 | 0% | |
| 24 | 14 | 0 | 0% |
Ausw. / BTTS 1H
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | 6 | 43% | |
| 2 | 14 | 6 | 43% | |
| 3 | 14 | 5 | 36% | |
| 4 | 13 | 4 | 31% | |
| 5 | 14 | 4 | 29% | |
| 6 | 13 | 3 | 23% | |
| 7 | 13 | 3 | 23% | |
| 8 | 14 | 3 | 21% | |
| 9 | 13 | 2 | 15% | |
| 10 | 13 | 2 | 15% | |
| 11 | 14 | 2 | 14% | |
| 12 | 14 | 2 | 14% | |
| 13 | 14 | 2 | 14% | |
| 14 | 14 | 2 | 14% | |
| 15 | 14 | 1 | 7% | |
| 16 | 14 | 1 | 7% | |
| 17 | 14 | 1 | 7% | |
| 18 | 14 | 1 | 7% | |
| 19 | 14 | 1 | 7% | |
| 20 | 14 | 0 | 0% | |
| 21 | 14 | 0 | 0% | |
| 22 | 14 | 0 | 0% | |
| 23 | 14 | 0 | 0% | |
| 24 | 14 | 0 | 0% |
BTTS-Insights — 1H
Shenzhen 2028 hat die höchste BTTS-Rate in 1H — 37%
Guangdong Mingtu ist #2 bei BTTS in 1H — 30%
Shanghai Second ist #3 bei BTTS in 1H — 30%
Qingdao Red Lions hat selten BTTS in 1H — 0%
Rizhao Yuqi hat selten BTTS in 1H — 4%
Xi'an Ronghai hat selten BTTS in 1H — 4%
BTTS-STATS — 1H
- 24 Teams
- Liga BTTS-Quote 1H: 15%
- Heim BTTS-Quote 1H: 15%
- Ausw. BTTS-Quote 1H: 15%
- Teams BTTS 1H ≥20%: 29% (7/24)
2. Halbzeit — BTTS-Quote
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % | Heim% | Ausw.% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28 | 12 | 43% | 43% | 43% | |
| 2 | 28 | 10 | 36% | 43% | 29% | |
| 3 | 28 | 10 | 36% | 36% | 36% | |
| 4 | 27 | 9 | 33% | 23% | 43% | |
| 5 | 27 | 8 | 30% | 46% | 14% | |
| 6 | 28 | 8 | 29% | 21% | 36% | |
| 7 | 27 | 7 | 26% | 14% | 38% | |
| 8 | 28 | 7 | 25% | 36% | 14% | |
| 9 | 28 | 7 | 25% | 29% | 21% | |
| 10 | 28 | 7 | 25% | 14% | 36% | |
| 11 | 27 | 6 | 22% | 0% | 46% | |
| 12 | 28 | 6 | 21% | 36% | 7% | |
| 13 | 27 | 5 | 19% | 21% | 15% | |
| 14 | 27 | 5 | 19% | 23% | 14% | |
| 15 | 27 | 5 | 19% | 31% | 7% | |
| 16 | 28 | 5 | 18% | 14% | 21% | |
| 17 | 28 | 5 | 18% | 14% | 21% | |
| 18 | 27 | 4 | 15% | 15% | 14% | |
| 19 | 27 | 4 | 15% | 7% | 23% | |
| 20 | 28 | 4 | 14% | 14% | 14% | |
| 21 | 28 | 4 | 14% | 14% | 14% | |
| 22 | 28 | 4 | 14% | 21% | 7% | |
| 23 | 28 | 3 | 11% | 14% | 7% | |
| 24 | 27 | 3 | 11% | 7% | 15% |
Heim / BTTS 2H
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | 6 | 46% | |
| 2 | 14 | 6 | 43% | |
| 3 | 14 | 6 | 43% | |
| 4 | 14 | 5 | 36% | |
| 5 | 14 | 5 | 36% | |
| 6 | 14 | 5 | 36% | |
| 7 | 13 | 4 | 31% | |
| 8 | 14 | 4 | 29% | |
| 9 | 13 | 3 | 23% | |
| 10 | 13 | 3 | 23% | |
| 11 | 14 | 3 | 21% | |
| 12 | 14 | 3 | 21% | |
| 13 | 14 | 3 | 21% | |
| 14 | 13 | 2 | 15% | |
| 15 | 14 | 2 | 14% | |
| 16 | 14 | 2 | 14% | |
| 17 | 14 | 2 | 14% | |
| 18 | 14 | 2 | 14% | |
| 19 | 14 | 2 | 14% | |
| 20 | 14 | 2 | 14% | |
| 21 | 14 | 2 | 14% | |
| 22 | 14 | 1 | 7% | |
| 23 | 14 | 1 | 7% | |
| 24 | 14 | 0 | 0% |
Ausw. / BTTS 2H
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | 6 | 46% | |
| 2 | 14 | 6 | 43% | |
| 3 | 14 | 6 | 43% | |
| 4 | 13 | 5 | 38% | |
| 5 | 14 | 5 | 36% | |
| 6 | 14 | 5 | 36% | |
| 7 | 14 | 5 | 36% | |
| 8 | 14 | 4 | 29% | |
| 9 | 13 | 3 | 23% | |
| 10 | 14 | 3 | 21% | |
| 11 | 14 | 3 | 21% | |
| 12 | 14 | 3 | 21% | |
| 13 | 13 | 2 | 15% | |
| 14 | 13 | 2 | 15% | |
| 15 | 14 | 2 | 14% | |
| 16 | 14 | 2 | 14% | |
| 17 | 14 | 2 | 14% | |
| 18 | 14 | 2 | 14% | |
| 19 | 14 | 2 | 14% | |
| 20 | 14 | 2 | 14% | |
| 21 | 14 | 1 | 7% | |
| 22 | 14 | 1 | 7% | |
| 23 | 14 | 1 | 7% | |
| 24 | 14 | 1 | 7% |
BTTS-Insights — 2H
BIT hat die höchste BTTS-Rate in 2H — 43%
Qingdao Red Lions ist #2 bei BTTS in 2H — 36%
Tai'an Tiankuang ist #3 bei BTTS in 2H — 36%
Dalian Kewei hat selten BTTS in 2H — 11%
Shanghai Port II hat selten BTTS in 2H — 11%
Chengdu Rongcheng II hat selten BTTS in 2H — 14%
BTTS-STATS — 2H
- 24 Teams
- Liga BTTS-Quote 2H: 22%
- Heim BTTS-Quote 2H: 22%
- Ausw. BTTS-Quote 2H: 22%
- Teams BTTS 2H ≥40%: 4% (1/24)
League Two (China) — Analyse BTTS (Beide Teams Treffen)
In der League Two (China) treffen beide Teams in 92% der Spiele. Shanghai Second hat die höchste BTTS-Rate mit 67% (18 Spiele). Rizhao Yuqi hat die niedrigste Rate mit 29%.
Wett-Tipp — BTTS-Märkte
BTTS Ja ist am zuverlässigsten, wenn zwei Teams mit hoher BTTS-Rate aufeinandertreffen. Gegen ein Team mit niedriger BTTS-Rate sollte man BTTS Nein in Betracht ziehen. Immer mit Daten zu kassierten Toren kombinieren.
Statistik-Tabellen — China
- FA Cup BTTS— Division Gold
- League One BTTS— Division Gold
- Super Cup BTTS— Division Premium
- Super League BTTS— Division Premium