League Two — Halbzeittabelle 1. Hälfte
China · 2026
Gesamt / 1. Halbzeit-Tabelle
| # | Team | MP | S-U-N | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Letzte 5 (HZ) | PPSp (HZ) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28 | 12-11-5 | 21 | 9 | +12 | 47 | WWWWW | 1.68 | 75% | 14% | 46% | 64% | 29% | 11% | 1.07 | |
| 2 | 28 | 10-12-6 | 23 | 16 | +7 | 42 | WDDDD | 1.50 | 54% | 25% | 50% | 71% | 36% | 18% | 1.39 | |
| 3 | 28 | 9-14-5 | 13 | 9 | +4 | 41 | DDDDD | 1.46 | 79% | 4% | 64% | 54% | 21% | 4% | 0.79 | |
| 4 | 28 | 8-16-4 | 18 | 13 | +5 | 40 | WWDLW | 1.43 | 64% | 25% | 46% | 64% | 29% | 11% | 1.11 | |
| 5 | 27 | 8-15-4 | 16 | 9 | +7 | 39 | DDDWD | 1.44 | 70% | 19% | 56% | 56% | 30% | 7% | 0.93 | |
| 6 | 28 | 8-15-5 | 13 | 10 | +3 | 39 | LDWDD | 1.39 | 71% | 11% | 61% | 57% | 21% | 4% | 0.82 | |
| 7 | 28 | 8-14-6 | 16 | 9 | +7 | 38 | DLDWD | 1.36 | 68% | 11% | 61% | 61% | 29% | 0% | 0.89 | |
| 8 | 27 | 9-11-7 | 16 | 11 | +5 | 38 | DDWLD | 1.41 | 67% | 7% | 59% | 67% | 30% | 4% | 1.00 | |
| 9 | 28 | 7-16-5 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 37 | WDDDW | 1.32 | 68% | 14% | 64% | 54% | 21% | 4% | 0.79 | |
| 10 | 28 | 8-12-8 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 36 | LDWLL | 1.29 | 57% | 14% | 64% | 64% | 36% | 7% | 1.07 | |
| 11 | 28 | 7-15-6 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 36 | DDDWD | 1.29 | 71% | 11% | 64% | 54% | 14% | 4% | 0.71 | |
| 12 | 28 | 5-20-3 | 15 | 12 | +3 | 35 | DDDDD | 1.25 | 64% | 29% | 54% | 54% | 32% | 7% | 0.96 | |
| 13 | 28 | 6-17-5 | 12 | 11 | +1 | 35 | DLDDD | 1.25 | 71% | 11% | 68% | 50% | 29% | 4% | 0.82 | |
| 14 | 28 | 7-14-7 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 35 | DWDWD | 1.25 | 64% | 11% | 64% | 61% | 14% | 0% | 0.75 | |
| 15 | 28 | 6-16-6 | 10 | 9 | +1 | 34 | DWLDD | 1.21 | 75% | 7% | 71% | 46% | 18% | 4% | 0.68 | |
| 16 | 28 | 5-18-5 | 17 | 18 | -1 | 33 | DDDLD | 1.18 | 50% | 36% | 50% | 64% | 46% | 11% | 1.25 | |
| 17 | 28 | 6-15-7 | 14 | 17 | -3 | 33 | DDLLD | 1.18 | 57% | 29% | 54% | 61% | 29% | 14% | 1.11 | |
| 18 | 28 | 6-14-8 | 9 | 8 | +1 | 32 | DLLLL | 1.14 | 71% | 0% | 79% | 50% | 7% | 4% | 0.61 | |
| 19 | 28 | 5-16-7 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 31 | DLDWD | 1.11 | 57% | 18% | 68% | 57% | 25% | 4% | 0.86 | |
| 20 | 28 | 3-20-5 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 29 | DDDLD | 1.04 | 79% | 4% | 86% | 32% | 14% | 0% | 0.46 | |
| 21 | 28 | 5-13-10 | 10 | 19 | -9 | 28 | DLWLD | 1.00 | 50% | 18% | 71% | 61% | 29% | 11% | 1.04 | |
| 22 | 28 | 3-16-9 | 10 | 17 | -7 | 25 | LWDWL | 0.89 | 46% | 21% | 68% | 64% | 32% | 0% | 0.96 | |
| 23 | 28 | 4-11-13 | 5 | 20 | -15 | 23 | DDLLW | 0.82 | 50% | 4% | 82% | 64% | 25% | 0% | 0.89 | |
| 24 | 28 | 1-17-10 | 9 | 22 | -13 | 20 | LDDWL | 0.71 | 43% | 25% | 71% | 61% | 36% | 7% | 1.11 |
League Two 2026 — Halbzeit-Tabelle
Nantong Haimen Codion führt die League Two-Tabelle der ersten Halbzeit gesamt mit 47 Punkten aus 28 Spielen (12S-11U-5N) an, mit einem Schnitt von 1.07 Toren pro Spiel.
Shanghai Port II folgt auf Platz 2 mit 42 Punkten. Der Ligaschnitt beträgt 0.92 Tore pro Spiel, mit Shanghai Port II als höchstem Wert (1.39).
Heim / 1. Halbzeit-Tabelle
| # | Team | MP | S-U-N | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Letzte 5 (HZ) | PPSp (HZ) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | 8-4-2 | 14 | 4 | +10 | 28 | WWWWD | 2.00 | 79% | 14% | 29% | 79% | 43% | 7% | 1.29 | |
| 2 | 14 | 6-8-0 | 9 | 1 | +8 | 26 | DDDWW | 1.86 | 93% | 7% | 50% | 50% | 21% | 0% | 0.71 | |
| 3 | 14 | 6-8-0 | 9 | 2 | +7 | 26 | WDWDD | 1.86 | 93% | 7% | 50% | 50% | 14% | 7% | 0.79 | |
| 4 | 14 | 5-8-1 | 10 | 3 | +7 | 23 | DDDDD | 1.64 | 79% | 14% | 50% | 57% | 29% | 7% | 0.93 | |
| 5 | 14 | 5-8-1 | 9 | 3 | +6 | 23 | DDWDD | 1.64 | 79% | 14% | 57% | 50% | 29% | 7% | 0.86 | |
| 6 | 14 | 6-5-3 | 11 | 7 | +4 | 23 | LWDDW | 1.64 | 57% | 21% | 50% | 71% | 43% | 14% | 1.29 | |
| 7 | 14 | 5-7-2 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 22 | DWDDD | 1.57 | 71% | 14% | 57% | 57% | 14% | 7% | 0.79 | |
| 8 | 14 | 5-6-3 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 21 | WLDDL | 1.50 | 79% | 0% | 64% | 57% | 21% | 0% | 0.79 | |
| 9 | 14 | 5-6-3 | 6 | 4 | +2 | 21 | WWDDW | 1.50 | 71% | 7% | 57% | 64% | 7% | 0% | 0.71 | |
| 10 | 14 | 5-6-3 | 9 | 8 | +1 | 21 | LWDDW | 1.50 | 57% | 29% | 50% | 64% | 29% | 21% | 1.21 | |
| 11 | 14 | 5-6-3 | 8 | 7 | +1 | 21 | DDDDW | 1.50 | 71% | 7% | 57% | 64% | 36% | 7% | 1.07 | |
| 12 | 14 | 5-6-3 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 21 | DDWDW | 1.50 | 64% | 14% | 57% | 64% | 21% | 7% | 0.93 | |
| 13 | 14 | 4-8-2 | 9 | 5 | +4 | 20 | DWLDD | 1.43 | 64% | 21% | 50% | 64% | 36% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 14 | 14 | 4-7-3 | 11 | 10 | +1 | 19 | WDDDL | 1.36 | 43% | 36% | 50% | 71% | 43% | 21% | 1.50 | |
| 15 | 14 | 3-9-2 | 5 | 2 | +3 | 18 | DLDDD | 1.29 | 86% | 0% | 79% | 36% | 7% | 7% | 0.50 | |
| 16 | 14 | 3-9-2 | 6 | 4 | +2 | 18 | DDWWD | 1.29 | 79% | 14% | 64% | 43% | 21% | 7% | 0.71 | |
| 17 | 14 | 3-9-2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 18 | DLDDW | 1.29 | 50% | 36% | 43% | 71% | 57% | 7% | 1.43 | |
| 18 | 13 | 3-8-2 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 17 | DDDLD | 1.31 | 77% | 8% | 69% | 46% | 23% | 0% | 0.69 | |
| 19 | 14 | 2-11-1 | 6 | 4 | +2 | 17 | WDLWD | 1.21 | 71% | 21% | 64% | 43% | 29% | 0% | 0.71 | |
| 20 | 14 | 3-7-4 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 16 | DDDWL | 1.14 | 57% | 14% | 64% | 64% | 21% | 0% | 0.86 | |
| 21 | 14 | 1-11-2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 14 | DDDDD | 1.00 | 79% | 7% | 86% | 29% | 7% | 0% | 0.36 | |
| 22 | 14 | 1-10-3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 13 | DLDDW | 0.93 | 57% | 29% | 64% | 50% | 29% | 7% | 1.00 | |
| 23 | 14 | 3-4-7 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 13 | DLWLD | 0.93 | 43% | 7% | 71% | 79% | 21% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 24 | 14 | 1-8-5 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 11 | LWDDL | 0.79 | 43% | 21% | 71% | 64% | 29% | 0% | 0.93 |
League Two 2026 — Heim Halbzeit-Tabelle
Nantong Haimen Codion führt die League Two-Tabelle der ersten Halbzeit zu Hause mit 28 Punkten aus 14 Spielen (8S-4U-2N) an, mit einem Schnitt von 1.29 Toren pro Spiel.
Langfang Glory City folgt auf Platz 2 mit 26 Punkten. Der Ligaschnitt beträgt 0.92 Tore pro Spiel, mit Shanghai Port II als höchstem Wert (1.50).
Auswärts / 1. Halbzeit-Tabelle
| # | Team | MP | S-U-N | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Letzte 5 (HZ) | PPSp (HZ) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | 6-5-3 | 12 | 6 | +6 | 23 | DDDDL | 1.64 | 64% | 14% | 50% | 71% | 29% | 14% | 1.29 | |
| 2 | 14 | 6-3-5 | 10 | 8 | +2 | 21 | DWLLW | 1.50 | 57% | 7% | 50% | 86% | 36% | 7% | 1.29 | |
| 3 | 14 | 4-8-2 | 5 | 2 | +3 | 20 | DDDDL | 1.43 | 86% | 0% | 71% | 43% | 7% | 0% | 0.50 | |
| 4 | 14 | 4-8-2 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 20 | DWDDD | 1.43 | 86% | 7% | 64% | 43% | 7% | 7% | 0.57 | |
| 5 | 14 | 5-5-4 | 9 | 8 | +1 | 20 | DLLDW | 1.43 | 57% | 29% | 43% | 71% | 29% | 21% | 1.21 | |
| 6 | 14 | 4-7-3 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 19 | WWWDD | 1.36 | 71% | 14% | 64% | 50% | 14% | 14% | 0.86 | |
| 7 | 14 | 4-6-4 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 18 | LDDDL | 1.29 | 71% | 0% | 71% | 57% | 21% | 0% | 0.79 | |
| 8 | 14 | 2-11-1 | 9 | 8 | +1 | 17 | DDDLD | 1.21 | 50% | 43% | 43% | 64% | 43% | 7% | 1.21 | |
| 9 | 13 | 3-7-3 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 16 | DDDDD | 1.23 | 62% | 23% | 54% | 62% | 31% | 8% | 1.00 | |
| 10 | 14 | 2-10-2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 16 | WDDDD | 1.14 | 71% | 14% | 71% | 43% | 21% | 0% | 0.64 | |
| 11 | 14 | 2-9-3 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 15 | DDDLD | 1.07 | 50% | 36% | 57% | 57% | 36% | 14% | 1.07 | |
| 12 | 14 | 2-9-3 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 15 | DLDDW | 1.07 | 79% | 0% | 86% | 36% | 21% | 0% | 0.57 | |
| 13 | 14 | 2-8-4 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 14 | WLDDL | 1.00 | 36% | 43% | 43% | 79% | 43% | 14% | 1.43 | |
| 14 | 14 | 3-5-6 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 14 | LLLDD | 1.00 | 57% | 0% | 79% | 64% | 7% | 0% | 0.71 | |
| 15 | 14 | 2-8-4 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 14 | DDWDL | 1.00 | 57% | 14% | 71% | 57% | 21% | 0% | 0.79 | |
| 16 | 14 | 1-10-3 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 13 | DDDDW | 0.93 | 71% | 14% | 79% | 36% | 14% | 7% | 0.57 | |
| 17 | 14 | 2-7-5 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 13 | DLLWD | 0.93 | 57% | 7% | 79% | 57% | 29% | 0% | 0.86 | |
| 18 | 14 | 2-7-5 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 13 | LWDDD | 0.93 | 50% | 14% | 71% | 64% | 21% | 7% | 0.93 | |
| 19 | 14 | 1-9-4 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 12 | LDDDL | 0.86 | 64% | 7% | 86% | 43% | 29% | 0% | 0.71 | |
| 20 | 14 | 1-7-6 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 10 | DLDLL | 0.71 | 57% | 0% | 93% | 50% | 29% | 0% | 0.79 | |
| 21 | 14 | 0-9-5 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 9 | LDDDL | 0.64 | 43% | 21% | 79% | 57% | 36% | 0% | 0.93 | |
| 22 | 14 | 0-9-5 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 9 | DDLDD | 0.64 | 43% | 29% | 71% | 57% | 43% | 14% | 1.29 | |
| 23 | 14 | 1-5-8 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 8 | LWDLL | 0.57 | 21% | 21% | 71% | 86% | 36% | 0% | 1.21 | |
| 24 | 14 | 0-7-7 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 7 | DLLDL | 0.50 | 43% | 7% | 93% | 57% | 29% | 0% | 0.86 |
League Two 2026 — Auswärts Halbzeit-Tabelle
Shanghai Port II führt die League Two-Tabelle der ersten Halbzeit auswärts mit 23 Punkten aus 14 Spielen (6S-5U-3N) an, mit einem Schnitt von 1.29 Toren pro Spiel.
Shandong Taishan II folgt auf Platz 2 mit 21 Punkten. Der Ligaschnitt beträgt 0.92 Tore pro Spiel, mit Xiamen Feilu als höchstem Wert (1.43).