League Two — Ohne Tor
China · 2026
Ohne Torerfolg
| # | Team | Sp | OT | OT% | Heim% | Ausw.% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Rizhao Yuqi | 28 | 15 | 54% | 50% | 57% |
| 2 |  Yichun Grand Tiger | 28 | 13 | 46% | 43% | 50% |
| 3 |  Chengdu Rongcheng II | 28 | 13 | 46% | 29% | 64% |
| 4 |  Qingdao Red Lions | 28 | 12 | 43% | 36% | 50% |
| 5 |  Shangyu Pterosaur | 28 | 12 | 43% | 14% | 71% |
| 6 |  Changchun Xidu | 28 | 12 | 43% | 50% | 36% |
| 7 |  Wuhan Three Towns II | 28 | 12 | 43% | 57% | 29% |
| 8 |  Tai'an Tiankuang | 28 | 11 | 39% | 43% | 36% |
| 9 |  Guangzhou Dandelion | 28 | 11 | 39% | 14% | 64% |
| 10 |  Xi'an Ronghai | 28 | 10 | 36% | 21% | 50% |
| 11 |  Guangdong Mingtu | 28 | 10 | 36% | 36% | 36% |
| 12 |  Dalian Yingbo B | 28 | 10 | 36% | 21% | 50% |
| 13 |  Xiamen Feilu | 28 | 10 | 36% | 43% | 29% |
| 14 |  Jiangxi Liansheng | 27 | 9 | 33% | 43% | 23% |
| 15 |  Langfang Glory City | 28 | 9 | 32% | 50% | 14% |
| 16 |  Shenzhen 2028 | 28 | 9 | 32% | 21% | 43% |
| 17 |  BIT | 28 | 8 | 29% | 21% | 36% |
| 18 |  Hubei Chufeng Heli | 28 | 8 | 29% | 21% | 36% |
| 19 |  Guizhou Zhucheng | 28 | 8 | 29% | 14% | 43% |
| 20 |  Shanghai Second | 28 | 8 | 29% | 43% | 14% |
| 21 |  Dalian Kewei | 28 | 8 | 29% | 21% | 36% |
| 22 |  Nantong Haimen Codion | 28 | 7 | 25% | 14% | 36% |
| 23 |  Shandong Taishan II | 27 | 6 | 22% | 31% | 14% |
| 24 |  Shanghai Port II | 28 | 6 | 21% | 21% | 21% |
Heim / Ohne Tor
| # | Team | Sp | OT | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wuhan Three Towns II | 14 | 8 | 57% |
| 2 | Rizhao Yuqi | 14 | 7 | 50% |
| 3 | Changchun Xidu | 14 | 7 | 50% |
| 4 | Langfang Glory City | 14 | 7 | 50% |
| 5 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 14 | 6 | 43% |
| 6 | Yichun Grand Tiger | 14 | 6 | 43% |
| 7 | Tai'an Tiankuang | 14 | 6 | 43% |
| 8 | Shanghai Second | 14 | 6 | 43% |
| 9 | Xiamen Feilu | 14 | 6 | 43% |
| 10 | Qingdao Red Lions | 14 | 5 | 36% |
| 11 | Guangdong Mingtu | 14 | 5 | 36% |
| 12 | Shandong Taishan II | 13 | 4 | 31% |
| 13 | Chengdu Rongcheng II | 14 | 4 | 29% |
| 14 | BIT | 14 | 3 | 21% |
| 15 | Hubei Chufeng Heli | 14 | 3 | 21% |
| 16 | Xi'an Ronghai | 14 | 3 | 21% |
| 17 | Shanghai Port II | 14 | 3 | 21% |
| 18 | Shenzhen 2028 | 14 | 3 | 21% |
| 19 | Dalian Kewei | 14 | 3 | 21% |
| 20 | Dalian Yingbo B | 14 | 3 | 21% |
| 21 | Nantong Haimen Codion | 14 | 2 | 14% |
| 22 | Shangyu Pterosaur | 14 | 2 | 14% |
| 23 | Guangzhou Dandelion | 14 | 2 | 14% |
| 24 | Guizhou Zhucheng | 14 | 2 | 14% |
Ausw. / Ohne Tor
| # | Team | Sp | OT | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shangyu Pterosaur | 14 | 10 | 71% |
| 2 | Guangzhou Dandelion | 14 | 9 | 64% |
| 3 | Chengdu Rongcheng II | 14 | 9 | 64% |
| 4 | Rizhao Yuqi | 14 | 8 | 57% |
| 5 | Qingdao Red Lions | 14 | 7 | 50% |
| 6 | Yichun Grand Tiger | 14 | 7 | 50% |
| 7 | Xi'an Ronghai | 14 | 7 | 50% |
| 8 | Dalian Yingbo B | 14 | 7 | 50% |
| 9 | Guizhou Zhucheng | 14 | 6 | 43% |
| 10 | Shenzhen 2028 | 14 | 6 | 43% |
| 11 | BIT | 14 | 5 | 36% |
| 12 | Hubei Chufeng Heli | 14 | 5 | 36% |
| 13 | Nantong Haimen Codion | 14 | 5 | 36% |
| 14 | Tai'an Tiankuang | 14 | 5 | 36% |
| 15 | Changchun Xidu | 14 | 5 | 36% |
| 16 | Guangdong Mingtu | 14 | 5 | 36% |
| 17 | Dalian Kewei | 14 | 5 | 36% |
| 18 | Wuhan Three Towns II | 14 | 4 | 29% |
| 19 | Xiamen Feilu | 14 | 4 | 29% |
| 20 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 13 | 3 | 23% |
| 21 | Shanghai Port II | 14 | 3 | 21% |
| 22 | Langfang Glory City | 14 | 2 | 14% |
| 23 | Shandong Taishan II | 14 | 2 | 14% |
| 24 | Shanghai Second | 14 | 2 | 14% |
Welche Teams scoren am seltensten?
Rizhao Yuqi erzielt am seltensten Tore in der Liga — 54%
Yichun Grand Tiger ist #2 bei der Ohne-Tor-Rate — 46%
Chengdu Rongcheng II ist #3 bei der Ohne-Tor-Rate — 46%
Shanghai Port II erzielt fast immer mindestens einen Treffer — 21%
Shandong Taishan II erzielt fast immer mindestens einen Treffer — 22%
Nantong Haimen Codion erzielt fast immer mindestens einen Treffer — 25%
Liga Ohne-Tor-Statistiken
- hat 24 Teams
- Liga Ohne-Tor-Quote: 35%
- Heim OT-Quote: 32%
- Ausw. OT-Quote: 39%
League Two (China) — Analyse Ohne Torerfolg
In der League Two (China) treffen Teams in 71% der Spiele nicht. Rizhao Yuqi trifft am seltensten und bleibt in 54% ihrer Spiele ohne Tor. Shanghai Port II hat den zuverlässigsten Angriff mit nur 21% ohne Torerfolg.
Wett-Tipp — Niedrigscore-Märkte
Eine hohe Trefferlosigkeitsrate ist ein starkes Signal für BTTS Nein-, Under 1.5- und Clean Sheet-Märkte. Wenn zwei Teams mit hoher FTS-Rate aufeinandertreffen, werden Under 1.5 und sogar Genaues Ergebnis 0-0 statistisch viable Wetten.
Statistik-Tabellen — China
- FA Cup Ohne Tor— Division Gold
- League One Ohne Tor— Division Gold
- Super Cup Ohne Tor— Division Premium
- Super League Ohne Tor— Division Premium