J1 League — Card Stats
Japan · 2027
Yellow Cards — Match Total
| # | Team | MP | O 1.5 | O 2.5 | O 3.5 | O 4.5 | O 5.5 | O 6.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | 92% | 69% | 38% | 38% | 23% | 8% | 3.7 | |
| 2 | 13 | 85% | 62% | 46% | 31% | 15% | 8% | 3.5 | |
| 3 | 12 | 100% | 67% | 42% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 3.3 | |
| 4 | 13 | 92% | 69% | 38% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 3.2 | |
| 5 | 13 | 62% | 62% | 54% | 38% | 8% | 0% | 3.2 | |
| 6 | 13 | 85% | 77% | 38% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 3.1 | |
| 7 | 13 | 100% | 62% | 31% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 3.1 | |
| 8 | 13 | 85% | 62% | 38% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 9 | 13 | 77% | 62% | 46% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 10 | 12 | 92% | 67% | 25% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 11 | 13 | 62% | 62% | 38% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 2.9 | |
| 12 | 12 | 83% | 50% | 33% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 2.8 | |
| 13 | 13 | 92% | 62% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 2.8 | |
| 14 | 13 | 77% | 46% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 2.5 | |
| 15 | 13 | 77% | 46% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.4 | |
| 16 | 13 | 69% | 46% | 23% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 2.4 | |
| 17 | 12 | 58% | 42% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 2.3 | |
| 18 | 12 | 50% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 2.3 | |
| 19 | 12 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 2.2 | |
| 20 | 13 | 69% | 38% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 |
Yellow Cards — Match Total
League avg
2.83
Most carded
3.7
Fewest carded
2.0
Yellow Cards per Match in J1 League 2027
JEF United Chiba leads J1 League with an average of 3.69 yellow cards per match across 13 fixtures — placing them at the top of the discipline table.
Yokohama F. Marinos (3.46) and Kyoto Sanga (3.33) follow closely, with the trio averaging 3.49 combined. Their games consistently generate elevated card activity.
At the other end, Machida Zelvia averages just 2.00 yellow cards per match — the lowest figure in the competition across 13 matches.
Disciplinary Market Insights
The J1 League averages 2.83 yellow cards per match as a league-wide baseline — a key reference for disciplinary betting markets.
The most active trio (JEF United Chiba, Yokohama F. Marinos, Kyoto Sanga) averages 3.49 collectively, sitting 0.66 above the league mean. Fixtures involving these sides provide a structural edge in over-threshold card markets.
Yellow Cards For
| # | Team | MP | O 0.5 | O 1.5 | O 2.5 | O 3.5 | O 4.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | 85% | 77% | 38% | 31% | 8% | 2.4 | |
| 2 | 13 | 92% | 54% | 38% | 15% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 3 | 13 | 92% | 62% | 31% | 8% | 0% | 1.9 | |
| 4 | 12 | 100% | 58% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 1.9 | |
| 5 | 13 | 85% | 46% | 23% | 8% | 0% | 1.6 | |
| 6 | 13 | 77% | 46% | 31% | 8% | 0% | 1.6 | |
| 7 | 13 | 92% | 54% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 8 | 13 | 77% | 38% | 31% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 9 | 13 | 85% | 38% | 23% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 10 | 12 | 75% | 42% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 1.4 | |
| 11 | 12 | 67% | 58% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 1.4 | |
| 12 | 13 | 92% | 31% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 1.3 | |
| 13 | 13 | 69% | 31% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 1.3 | |
| 14 | 12 | 67% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 1.2 | |
| 15 | 12 | 75% | 25% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 1.2 | |
| 16 | 13 | 77% | 31% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.1 | |
| 17 | 13 | 69% | 23% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 18 | 13 | 69% | 23% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.9 | |
| 19 | 13 | 62% | 23% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.8 | |
| 20 | 12 | 58% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.8 |
Yellow Cards For
League avg
1.42
Most carded
2.4
Fewest carded
0.8
Yellow Cards For — J1 League 2027
JEF United Chiba leads J1 League with an average of 2.38 yellow cards per match across 13 fixtures — placing them at the top of the discipline table.
Cerezo Osaka (2.00) and Avispa Fukuoka (1.92) follow closely, with the trio averaging 2.10 combined. Their games consistently generate elevated card activity.
At the other end, Vissel Kobe averages just 0.75 yellow cards per match — the lowest figure in the competition across 12 matches.
Disciplinary Market Insights
The J1 League averages 1.42 yellow cards per match as a league-wide baseline — a key reference for disciplinary betting markets.
The most active trio (JEF United Chiba, Cerezo Osaka, Avispa Fukuoka) averages 2.10 collectively, sitting 0.68 above the league mean. Fixtures involving these sides provide a structural edge in over-threshold card markets.
Yellow Cards Against
| # | Team | MP | O 0.5 | O 1.5 | O 2.5 | O 3.5 | O 4.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | 100% | 67% | 42% | 17% | 0% | 2.3 | |
| 2 | 13 | 100% | 54% | 38% | 8% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 3 | 13 | 100% | 46% | 23% | 15% | 0% | 1.9 | |
| 4 | 13 | 85% | 54% | 23% | 8% | 8% | 1.8 | |
| 5 | 13 | 85% | 62% | 23% | 8% | 0% | 1.8 | |
| 6 | 13 | 85% | 46% | 23% | 8% | 8% | 1.7 | |
| 7 | 13 | 85% | 38% | 31% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 8 | 13 | 100% | 38% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 9 | 12 | 83% | 42% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 1.4 | |
| 10 | 12 | 75% | 33% | 25% | 8% | 0% | 1.4 | |
| 11 | 13 | 85% | 38% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 1.3 | |
| 12 | 13 | 77% | 38% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 1.3 | |
| 13 | 13 | 69% | 46% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 1.2 | |
| 14 | 13 | 69% | 38% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 1.2 | |
| 15 | 12 | 58% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 1.2 | |
| 16 | 13 | 77% | 23% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 1.1 | |
| 17 | 12 | 75% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 18 | 12 | 50% | 25% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0.9 | |
| 19 | 13 | 54% | 31% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0.9 | |
| 20 | 13 | 54% | 23% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 0.9 |
Yellow Cards Against
League avg
1.42
Most carded
2.3
Fewest carded
0.9
Yellow Cards Against — J1 League 2027
Vissel Kobe leads J1 League with an average of 2.25 yellow cards conceded per match across 12 fixtures — placing them at the top of the discipline table.
Nagoya Grampus (2.00) and Yokohama F. Marinos (1.85) follow closely, with the trio averaging 2.03 combined. Their games consistently generate elevated card activity.
At the other end, V-varen Nagasaki averages just 0.92 yellow cards conceded per match — the lowest figure in the competition across 13 matches.
Disciplinary Market Insights
The J1 League averages 1.42 yellow cards conceded per match as a league-wide baseline — a key reference for disciplinary betting markets.
The most active trio (Vissel Kobe, Nagoya Grampus, Yokohama F. Marinos) averages 2.03 collectively, sitting 0.61 above the league mean. Fixtures involving these sides provide a structural edge in over-threshold card markets.