MatchPulse
3. Division

3. Division — Failed To Score

Denmark · 2026/27

Failed To Score

#TeamMPFTSFTS%Home%Away%
1Holstebro14643%14%71%
2Ishøj14643%29%57%
3Næsby14429%14%43%
4Ringsted14321%14%29%
5Brønshøj14214%13%17%
6Frem14214%17%13%
7Holbæk B&I14214%14%14%
8Sundby14214%17%13%
9ASA Aarhus14214%0%29%
10FC Helsingor1417%0%14%
11Vanløse1417%14%0%
12Hørsholm-Usserød1417%13%0%

Home / Failed To Score

#TeamMPFTS%
1Ishøj7229%
2Frem6117%
3Sundby6117%
4Holbæk B&I7114%
5Holstebro7114%
6Vanløse7114%
7Næsby7114%
8Ringsted7114%
9Brønshøj8113%
10Hørsholm-Usserød8113%
11FC Helsingor700%
12ASA Aarhus700%

Away / Failed To Score

#TeamMPFTS%
1Holstebro7571%
2Ishøj7457%
3Næsby7343%
4Ringsted7229%
5ASA Aarhus7229%
6Brønshøj6117%
7FC Helsingor7114%
8Holbæk B&I7114%
9Frem8113%
10Sundby8113%
11Vanløse700%
12Hørsholm-Usserød600%

Which teams fail to score most often?

Holstebro fails to score most often in the league — 43%

Ishøj is #2 for failed-to-score rate — 43%

Næsby is #3 for failed-to-score rate — 29%

Hørsholm-Usserød rarely fails to score — 7%

Vanløse rarely fails to score — 7%

FC Helsingor rarely fails to score — 7%

League Blank Stats

  • consists of 12 teams
  • League failed-to-score rate: 19%
  • Home FTS rate: 13%
  • Away FTS rate: 25%

3. Division (Denmark) — Failed To Score Analysis

In the 3. Division (Denmark), teams fail to score in 38% of matches this season. Holstebro fails to score the most, going blank in 43% of their games (6 matches), with 14% at home and 71% away. Hørsholm-Usserød has the most reliable attack, failing to score in only 7% of games.

Betting Angle — Low-Scoring Markets

A high failed-to-score rate is a strong signal for BTTS No, Under 1.5, and Clean Sheet markets when facing that team. When two high-FTS teams play each other, the Under 1.5 and even the 0-0 Correct Score become statistically viable bets.