Denmark Series - Group 4 — Failed To Score
Denmark · 2025/26
Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | FTS% | Home% | Away% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Aalborg Freja | 16 | 6 | 38% | 50% | 25% |
| 2 |  Fuglebakken KFUM | 16 | 5 | 31% | 50% | 13% |
| 3 |  Viby | 17 | 5 | 29% | 22% | 38% |
| 4 |  Hobro II | 16 | 4 | 25% | 22% | 29% |
| 5 |  Vorup | 16 | 4 | 25% | 14% | 33% |
| 6 |  VRI | 18 | 4 | 22% | 22% | 22% |
| 7 |  Nørresundby | 17 | 3 | 18% | 0% | 33% |
| 8 |  Aarhus Fremad II | 17 | 1 | 6% | 11% | 0% |
| 9 |  Holstebro | 18 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |  ASA Aarhus | 15 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Home / Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fuglebakken KFUM | 8 | 4 | 50% |
| 2 | Aalborg Freja | 8 | 4 | 50% |
| 3 | Viby | 9 | 2 | 22% |
| 4 | VRI | 9 | 2 | 22% |
| 5 | Hobro II | 9 | 2 | 22% |
| 6 | Vorup | 7 | 1 | 14% |
| 7 | Aarhus Fremad II | 9 | 1 | 11% |
| 8 | Holstebro | 9 | 0 | 0% |
| 9 | Nørresundby | 8 | 0 | 0% |
| 10 | ASA Aarhus | 7 | 0 | 0% |
Away / Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Viby | 8 | 3 | 38% |
| 2 | Nørresundby | 9 | 3 | 33% |
| 3 | Vorup | 9 | 3 | 33% |
| 4 | Hobro II | 7 | 2 | 29% |
| 5 | Aalborg Freja | 8 | 2 | 25% |
| 6 | VRI | 9 | 2 | 22% |
| 7 | Fuglebakken KFUM | 8 | 1 | 13% |
| 8 | Holstebro | 9 | 0 | 0% |
| 9 | Aarhus Fremad II | 8 | 0 | 0% |
| 10 | ASA Aarhus | 8 | 0 | 0% |
Which teams fail to score most often?
Aalborg Freja fails to score most often in the league — 38%
Fuglebakken KFUM is #2 for failed-to-score rate — 31%
Viby is #3 for failed-to-score rate — 29%
ASA Aarhus rarely fails to score — 0%
Holstebro rarely fails to score — 0%
Aarhus Fremad II rarely fails to score — 6%
League Blank Stats
- consists of 10 teams
- League failed-to-score rate: 19%
- Home FTS rate: 19%
- Away FTS rate: 19%
Denmark Series - Group 4 (Denmark) — Failed To Score Analysis
In the Denmark Series - Group 4 (Denmark), teams fail to score in 39% of matches this season. Aalborg Freja fails to score the most, going blank in 38% of their games (6 matches), with 50% at home and 25% away. ASA Aarhus has the most reliable attack, failing to score in only 0% of games.
Betting Angle — Low-Scoring Markets
A high failed-to-score rate is a strong signal for BTTS No, Under 1.5, and Clean Sheet markets when facing that team. When two high-FTS teams play each other, the Under 1.5 and even the 0-0 Correct Score become statistically viable bets.
Statistics Tables — Denmark
- 1. Division Failed To Score— Division Gold
- 2. Division Failed To Score— Division Regional
- 2nd Division - Group 2 Failed To Score— Division Regional
- 3. Division Failed To Score— Division Amateur
- B-Liga Women Failed To Score
- DBU Pokalen Failed To Score— Division Gold
- Denmark Series - Group 1 Failed To Score— Division Amateur
- Denmark Series - Group 2 Failed To Score— Division Amateur
- Denmark Series - Group 3 Failed To Score— Division Amateur
- Denmark Series - Promotion Round Failed To Score— Division Amateur
- Denmark Series - Relegation Round Failed To Score— Division Amateur
- Kvindeliga Failed To Score— Division Women's Pro
- Superliga Failed To Score— Division Premium