Shield Cup — Home Advantage
Jordan · 2025/26
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +34% | +35% | +33% | 1.50/0.00 | |
| 2 | +34% | +6% | +63% | 2.00/1.00 | |
| 3 | +29% | +35% | +23% | 1.75/0.20 | |
| 4 | +16% | +41% | -9% | 1.40/1.00 | |
| 5 | +16% | -11% | +43% | 1.40/0.75 | |
| 6 | +10% | +78% | -58% | 3.00/1.00 | |
| 7 | -8% | -58% | +43% | 1.00/1.50 | |
| 8 | -8% | -35% | +19% | 0.80/0.75 | |
| 9 | -13% | -14% | -11% | 2.25/2.20 | |
| 10 | -19% | +5% | -43% | 3.00/2.40 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
Shield Cup (Jordan) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the Shield Cup (Jordan), the average home win rate is 56% compared to 31% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Al Wihdat shows the strongest home advantage, winning 100% of home games versus just 20% away (a difference of +80%). At the other end, Al Hussein actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 20% versus 50% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +78% | 3.25 | 0.40 | |
| 2 | +41% | 1.20 | 0.50 | |
| 3 | +35% | 1.25 | 0.60 | |
| 4 | +35% | 1.25 | 0.60 | |
| 5 | +6% | 1.40 | 1.25 | |
| 6 | +5% | 2.00 | 1.80 | |
| 7 | -11% | 0.60 | 0.75 | |
| 8 | -14% | 0.75 | 1.00 | |
| 9 | -35% | 0.60 | 1.25 | |
| 10 | -58% | 0.20 | 0.75 |
Shield Cup (Jordan) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
Al Wihdat has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Shield Cup (Jordan), netting 3.25 goals/match at home versus 0.40 away — a Scoring Advantage of +78%. In contrast, Al Hussein scores more away (0.75/match) than at home (0.20/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -58% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +63% | 0.40 | 1.75 | |
| 2 | +43% | 0.60 | 1.50 | |
| 3 | +43% | 0.60 | 1.50 | |
| 4 | +33% | 1.00 | 2.00 | |
| 5 | +23% | 1.00 | 1.60 | |
| 6 | +19% | 1.20 | 1.75 | |
| 7 | -9% | 1.20 | 1.00 | |
| 8 | -11% | 0.50 | 0.40 | |
| 9 | -43% | 1.00 | 0.40 | |
| 10 | -58% | 1.50 | 0.40 |
Shield Cup (Jordan) — Home Defence Analysis
Al Ahli has the best home defensive record in the Shield Cup (Jordan), conceding just 0.40 goals/match at home compared to 1.75 away — a Defence Advantage of +63%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Al Wihdat concedes more at home (1.50/match) than away (0.40/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.80 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | +82% | 2.00 | 0.20 | |
| 3 | +58% | 0.75 | 0.20 | |
| 4 | +11% | 0.50 | 0.40 | |
| 5 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 6 | -9% | 0.50 | 0.60 | |
| 7 | -11% | 0.60 | 0.75 | |
| 8 | -33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 9 | -100% | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| 10 | -100% | 0.00 | 0.50 |
Shield Cup (Jordan) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Al Buqa'a has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Shield Cup (Jordan), netting 0.80 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Shabab Al Ordon shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.00/match at home against 0.50 away (-100%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +58% | 0.20 | 0.75 | |
| 2 | +43% | 0.60 | 1.50 | |
| 3 | +41% | 0.50 | 1.20 | |
| 4 | +11% | 0.40 | 0.50 | |
| 5 | +11% | 0.40 | 0.50 | |
| 6 | +9% | 0.50 | 0.60 | |
| 7 | -43% | 0.50 | 0.20 | |
| 8 | -52% | 0.80 | 0.25 | |
| 9 | -100% | 0.25 | 0.00 | |
| 10 | -100% | 0.50 | 0.00 |
Shield Cup (Jordan) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Al Ahli has the best home defensive record in the Shield Cup (Jordan), conceding just 0.20 goals/match at home compared to 0.75 away — a Defence Advantage of +58%. Al Wihdat struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.50/match at home versus 0.00 away (-100%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.25 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | +72% | 1.25 | 0.20 | |
| 3 | +58% | 0.75 | 0.20 | |
| 4 | +41% | 0.60 | 0.25 | |
| 5 | +41% | 0.60 | 0.25 | |
| 6 | +23% | 0.80 | 0.50 | |
| 7 | +11% | 1.50 | 1.20 | |
| 8 | +11% | 0.50 | 0.40 | |
| 9 | -11% | 0.40 | 0.50 | |
| 10 | -58% | 0.20 | 0.75 |
Shield Cup (Jordan) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Al Salt has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Shield Cup (Jordan), netting 0.25 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Al Hussein shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.20/match at home against 0.75 away (-58%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +67% | 0.20 | 1.00 | |
| 2 | +67% | 0.20 | 1.00 | |
| 3 | +67% | 0.20 | 1.00 | |
| 4 | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 5 | +30% | 0.40 | 0.75 | |
| 6 | +23% | 0.25 | 0.40 | |
| 7 | +23% | 0.50 | 0.80 | |
| 8 | -41% | 0.60 | 0.25 | |
| 9 | -43% | 0.50 | 0.20 | |
| 10 | -43% | 1.00 | 0.40 |
Shield Cup (Jordan) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Al Ahli has the best home defensive record in the Shield Cup (Jordan), conceding just 0.20 goals/match at home compared to 1.00 away — a Defence Advantage of +67%. Al Wihdat struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.00/match at home versus 0.40 away (-43%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Jordan
- Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- League Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Super Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground