WSL Cup — Form Table
England · 2026/27
Combined Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Manchester United W | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 5 | +18 | 12 | WWWW | 3.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 5.75 | 100% | 100% | 7.00 | |
| 2 |  London City Lionesses W | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 3 | +6 | 12 | WWWW | 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 2.25 | 75% | 50% | 3.00 | |
| 3 |  Aston Villa W | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 | +6 | 10 | WWWD | 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 2.00 | 100% | 25% | 2.50 | |
| 4 |  Everton W | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | +5 | 9 | WWW | 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 2.00 | 100% | 33% | 2.33 | |
| 5 |  Tottenham Hotspur W | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 | +6 | 7 | DWW | 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 2.33 | 33% | 33% | 2.67 | |
| 6 |  West Ham W | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 | +2 | 7 | DWLW | 1.75 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 1.50 | 75% | 75% | 2.50 | |
| 7 |  Brighton W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 1 | +9 | 6 | WLW | 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 3.33 | 67% | 67% | 3.67 | |
| 8 |  Liverpool W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 10 | +1 | 6 | WWL | 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.67 | 100% | 100% | 7.00 | |
| 9 |  Crystal Palace W | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 7 | +1 | 6 | WWLL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 2.00 | 75% | 75% | 3.75 | |
| 10 |  Sunderland W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6 | LWW | 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 2.67 | |
| 11 |  Southampton W | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 5 | LDWD | 1.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.50 | 100% | 50% | 3.25 | |
| 12 |  Birmingham City W | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 7 | +2 | 4 | LLWD | 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 2.25 | 100% | 50% | 4.00 | |
| 13 |  Ipswich Town W | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 | +2 | 4 | LDW | 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 2.00 | 67% | 67% | 3.33 | |
| 14 |  Nottingham Forest W | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 4 | LDW | 1.33 | 67% | 67% | 0% | 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 2.00 | |
| 15 |  Wolverhampton W | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 4 | DLW | 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 1.33 | 100% | 100% | 4.33 | |
| 16 |  Newcastle United W | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 3 | LLLW | 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 1.50 | 75% | 50% | 3.25 | |
| 17 |  Charlton Athletic W | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 3 | LLWL | 0.75 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 0.75 | 100% | 75% | 3.00 | |
| 18 |  Burnley W | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 3 | WLLL | 0.75 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 0.75 | 100% | 75% | 3.50 | |
| 19 |  Leicester City FC W | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 2 | LDD | 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 1.00 | 100% | 33% | 2.67 | |
| 20 |  Watford W | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 | LDL | 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 1.00 | 67% | 67% | 3.33 | |
| 21 |  Bristol City W | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 1 | DLLL | 0.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 0.75 | 100% | 50% | 3.50 | |
| 22 |  Sheffield United W | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 1 | LDLL | 0.25 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 3.75 | |
| 23 |  Durham W | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 18 | -14 | 0 | LLLL | 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.50 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Who Is in the Best Form in the Last 7 Games?
Manchester United W leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 games.
London City Lionesses W is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Everton W is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Durham W is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Sheffield United W is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 0% and 0.25 PPG.
Bristol City W has the worst form over the last 7 games with just 0% wins and only 0.25 PPG.
- •The WSL Cup (England) Last 7 Games Form Table covers 23 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent games.
- •Win rate across the WSL Cup in this period is 41%
- •Teams score an average of 1.80 goals per game and concede 1.80 — a combined 3.61 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 54% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 26% of games.
WSL Cup (England) Last 7 Games — Form Table Insights
Manchester United W, London City Lionesses W and Everton W have been the standout performers in the WSL Cup (England) over the last 7 games, leading the form table with 3.00, 3.00 and 3.00 PPG respectively. Across the WSL Cup, teams score an average of 1.80 goals and concede 1.80 per game — a combined 3.61 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 54% of fixtures while 26% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Durham W and Sheffield United W have struggled in recent games, collecting just 0.00 and 0.25 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the WSL Cup.
Home Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manchester United W | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 1 | +12 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 6.50 | 100% | 100% | 7.00 | |
| 2 | Crystal Palace W | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | +4 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | |
| 3 | Everton W | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | +4 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 4 | Aston Villa W | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 3.00 | |
| 5 | Southampton W | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 3.50 | |
| 6 | Wolverhampton W | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 4 | DLW | 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 1.33 | 100% | 100% | 4.33 | |
| 7 | Brighton W | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 2.50 | |
| 8 | Nottingham Forest W | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 3.00 | |
| 9 | London City Lionesses W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | |
| 10 | West Ham W | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.50 | |
| 11 | Charlton Athletic W | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 1.50 | 100% | 50% | 2.50 | |
| 12 | Sunderland W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 13 | Liverpool W | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.50 | 100% | 100% | 7.00 | |
| 14 | Burnley W | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 1.50 | 100% | 50% | 3.50 | |
| 15 | Tottenham Hotspur W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | |
| 16 | Sheffield United W | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 1.50 | |
| 17 | Watford W | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.50 | 100% | 100% | 4.50 | |
| 18 | Bristol City W | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 50% | 4.50 | |
| 19 | Birmingham City W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 7.00 | |
| 20 | Newcastle United W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 21 | Ipswich Town W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 22 | Leicester City FC W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 23 | Durham W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 15 | -13 | 0 | LLL | 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 0.67 | 100% | 100% | 5.67 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms? (Last 7 Home Games)
Manchester United W leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 home games.
Crystal Palace W is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Everton W is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Durham W is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Leicester City FC W is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Ipswich Town W has the worst form over the last 7 home games with just 0% wins and only 0.00 PPG.
- •The WSL Cup (England) Home Form Table (Last 7) covers 23 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent home games.
- •Win rate across the WSL Cup in this period is 41%
- •Teams score an average of 1.80 goals per game and concede 1.80 — a combined 3.61 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 54% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 24% of games.
WSL Cup (England) — Home Form Table Insights (Last 7 Home Games)
Manchester United W, Crystal Palace W and Everton W have been the standout performers in the WSL Cup (England) over the last 7 home games, leading the form table with 3.00, 3.00 and 3.00 PPG respectively. Across the WSL Cup, teams score an average of 1.80 goals and concede 1.80 per game — a combined 3.61 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 54% of fixtures while 24% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Durham W and Leicester City FC W have struggled in recent home games, collecting just 0.00 and 0.00 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the WSL Cup.
Away Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | London City Lionesses W | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | +4 | 9 | WWW | 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 2.00 | |
| 2 | Manchester United W | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 4 | +6 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 5.00 | 100% | 100% | 7.00 | |
| 3 | Tottenham Hotspur W | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | +6 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 3.50 | 50% | 50% | 4.00 | |
| 4 | Aston Villa W | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | +4 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 5 | Ipswich Town W | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.50 | |
| 6 | Birmingham City W | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 4 | LWD | 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 2.00 | 100% | 33% | 3.00 | |
| 7 | West Ham W | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 1.50 | |
| 8 | Brighton W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | +6 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 6.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | |
| 9 | Liverpool W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 7.00 | |
| 10 | Everton W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 11 | Newcastle United W | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 3 | LLW | 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 2.00 | 100% | 67% | 4.00 | |
| 12 | Sunderland W | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 3.50 | |
| 13 | Leicester City FC W | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.50 | 100% | 50% | 3.00 | |
| 14 | Nottingham Forest W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | |
| 15 | Southampton W | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 50% | 3.00 | |
| 16 | Durham W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 17 | Watford W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 18 | Crystal Palace W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 0 | LL | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.50 | |
| 19 | Bristol City W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 | LL | 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0.50 | 100% | 50% | 2.50 | |
| 20 | Burnley W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | -7 | 0 | LL | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.50 | |
| 21 | Charlton Athletic W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | -7 | 0 | LL | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.50 | |
| 22 | Sheffield United W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 0 | LL | 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 6.00 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms? (Last 7 Away Games)
London City Lionesses W leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 away games.
Manchester United W is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Tottenham Hotspur W is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Sheffield United W is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Charlton Athletic W is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Burnley W has the worst form over the last 7 away games with just 0% wins and only 0.00 PPG.
- •The WSL Cup (England) Away Form Table (Last 7) covers 22 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent away games.
- •Win rate across the WSL Cup in this period is 41%
- •Teams score an average of 1.80 goals per game and concede 1.80 — a combined 3.61 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 54% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 27% of games.
WSL Cup (England) — Away Form Table Insights (Last 7 Away Games)
London City Lionesses W, Manchester United W and Tottenham Hotspur W have been the standout performers in the WSL Cup (England) over the last 7 away games, leading the form table with 3.00, 3.00 and 3.00 PPG respectively. Across the WSL Cup, teams score an average of 1.80 goals and concede 1.80 per game — a combined 3.61 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 54% of fixtures while 27% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Sheffield United W and Charlton Athletic W have struggled in recent away games, collecting just 0.00 and 0.00 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the WSL Cup.
Form Tables — England
- Championship Form Table— Division Premium
- Community Shield Form Table— Division Elite
- Community Shield Women Form Table— Division Women's Pro
- EFL Trophy Form Table— Division Gold
- FA Cup Form Table— Division Premium
- FA Trophy Form Table— Division Pro
- FA WSL Form Table— Division Women's Elite
- FA Women's Cup Form Table— Division Women's Pro
- FA Youth Cup Form Table— Division Academy
- League Cup Form Table— Division Premium
- League One Form Table— Division Gold
- League Two Form Table— Division Gold
- National League Form Table— Division Pro
- National League - North Form Table— Division Pro
- National League - North - Play-offs Form Table— Division Underground
- National League - Play-offs Form Table— Division Underground
- National League - South Form Table— Division Pro
- National League - South - Play-offs Form Table— Division Underground
- National League Cup Form Table— Division Underground
- Non League Div One - Isthmian North Form Table— Division Amateur
- Non League Div One - Isthmian South Central Form Table— Division Amateur
- Non League Div One - Isthmian South East Form Table— Division Amateur
- Non League Div One - Northern East Form Table— Division Amateur
- Non League Div One - Northern Midlands Form Table— Division Amateur
- Non League Div One - Northern West Form Table— Division Amateur
- Non League Div One - Play-offs Form Table— Division Amateur
- Non League Div One - Southern Central Form Table— Division Amateur
- Non League Div One - Southern South Form Table— Division Amateur
- Non League Premier - Isthmian Form Table— Division Regional
- Non League Premier - Isthmian - Play-offs Form Table— Division Regional
- Non League Premier - Northern Form Table— Division Regional
- Non League Premier - Northern - Play-offs Form Table— Division Regional
- Non League Premier - Southern Central Form Table— Division Regional
- Non League Premier - Southern Central - Play-offs Form Table— Division Regional
- Non League Premier - Southern South Form Table— Division Regional
- Non League Premier - Southern South - Play-offs Form Table— Division Regional
- Premier League Form Table— Division Elite
- Premier League - Summer Series Form Table— Division Underground
- Premier League 2 Division One Form Table— Division Academy
- Premier League Cup Form Table— Division Academy
- Professional Development League Form Table— Division Academy
- U18 Premier League - Championship Form Table— Division Academy
- U18 Premier League - North Form Table— Division Academy
- U18 Premier League - South Form Table— Division Academy
- Women's Championship Form Table— Division Women's Elite