MatchPulse
Paulista - A3

Paulista - A3 — Goals Conceded

Brazil · 2026

Goals Conceded

#TeamMPTotal/GameHomeAwayHome Adv%
1Marília19100.5337+44%
2Portuguesa Santista19120.6339+54%
3XV de Jau19130.6867+2%
4Rio Preto19150.79510+29%
5Paulista17150.8878+1%
6Catanduva15151.00870%
7União São João15151.0096-14%
8EC São Bernardo17171.00710+12%
9Uniao Barbarense17171.00710+12%
10Rio Claro17191.12910+11%
11Bandeirante SP15191.27811+9%
12Francana15221.47715+30%
13Rio Branco SP15241.601014+23%
14Desportivo Brasil15251.671510-14%
15Itapirense15261.731313+7%
16USAC15281.871216+8%

Home / Goals Conceded

#TeamMP⊕ ConcededØ AVG
1Desportivo Brasil8151.88
2USAC7121.71
3Itapirense8131.63
4Rio Branco SP8101.25
5Bandeirante SP781.14
6União São João891.13
7Rio Claro991.00
8Catanduva881.00
9Francana771.00
10EC São Bernardo870.88
11Paulista870.88
12Uniao Barbarense870.88
13XV de Jau960.67
14Rio Preto950.56
15Portuguesa Santista1030.30
16Marília1030.30

Away / Goals Conceded

#TeamMP⊕ ConcededØ AVG
1USAC8162.00
2Rio Branco SP7142.00
3Francana8151.88
4Itapirense7131.86
5Desportivo Brasil7101.43
6Bandeirante SP8111.38
7Rio Claro8101.25
8EC São Bernardo9101.11
9Uniao Barbarense9101.11
10Portuguesa Santista991.00
11Rio Preto10101.00
12Catanduva771.00
13Paulista980.89
14União São João760.86
15Marília970.78
16XV de Jau1070.70

Which teams concede the most goals?

USAC concedes the most goals in the league — 1.87 per game

Itapirense is #2 for goals conceded — 1.73 per game

Desportivo Brasil is #3 for goals conceded — 1.67 per game

Marília has one of the tightest defences — 0.53 per game

Portuguesa Santista has one of the tightest defences — 0.63 per game

XV de Jau has one of the tightest defences — 0.68 per game

League Defensive Stats

  • consists of 16 teams
  • League avg conceded per game: 1.11 per game
  • Home avg conceded: 0.98 per game
  • Away avg conceded: 1.23 per game

1st Half — Goals Conceded

#TeamMP⊕ ConcededØ AVGHome ØAway Ø
1USAC15140.930.861.00
2Desportivo Brasil15130.871.000.71
3Itapirense15130.870.880.86
4Rio Branco SP15110.730.750.71
5Bandeirante SP15100.670.430.88
6Francana15100.670.430.88
7Rio Claro17110.650.440.88
8Portuguesa Santista1970.370.100.67
9EC São Bernardo1760.350.380.33
10Uniao Barbarense1760.350.250.44
11Catanduva1550.330.500.14
12União São João1550.330.500.14
13Paulista1740.240.380.11
14Rio Preto1940.210.220.20
15Marília1930.160.100.22
16XV de Jau1920.110.110.10

Home / 1st Half Conceded

#TeamMP⊕ ConcededØ AVG
1Desportivo Brasil881.00
2Itapirense870.88
3USAC760.86
4Rio Branco SP860.75
5Catanduva840.50
6União São João840.50
7Rio Claro940.44
8Bandeirante SP730.43
9Francana730.43
10EC São Bernardo830.38
11Paulista830.38
12Uniao Barbarense820.25
13Rio Preto920.22
14XV de Jau910.11
15Portuguesa Santista1010.10
16Marília1010.10

Away / 1st Half Conceded

#TeamMP⊕ ConcededØ AVG
1USAC881.00
2Rio Claro870.88
3Bandeirante SP870.88
4Francana870.88
5Itapirense760.86
6Desportivo Brasil750.71
7Rio Branco SP750.71
8Portuguesa Santista960.67
9Uniao Barbarense940.44
10EC São Bernardo930.33
11Marília920.22
12Rio Preto1020.20
13Catanduva710.14
14União São João710.14
15Paulista910.11
16XV de Jau1010.10

1st Half Defensive Insights

USAC concedes most in 1H — 0.93 conceded/game

Desportivo Brasil is #2 conceded 1H — 0.87 conceded/game

Itapirense is #3 conceded 1H — 0.87 conceded/game

XV de Jau has the tightest 1H defence — 0.11 conceded/game

Marília has the tightest 1H defence — 0.16 conceded/game

Rio Preto has the tightest 1H defence — 0.21 conceded/game

1ST HALF DEF. STATS

  • 16 teams
  • 1H conceded avg: 0.47 conceded/game
  • Home conceded 1H: 0.44 conceded/game
  • Away conceded 1H: 0.50 conceded/game
  • Teams avg ≥0.5 conceded 1H: 44% (7/16)

2nd Half — Goals Conceded

#TeamMP⊕ ConcededØ AVGHome ØAway Ø
1USAC15140.930.861.00
2Itapirense15130.870.751.00
3Rio Branco SP15130.870.501.29
4Desportivo Brasil15120.800.880.71
5Francana15120.800.571.00
6Catanduva15100.670.500.86
7União São João15100.670.630.71
8EC São Bernardo17110.650.500.78
9Paulista17110.650.500.78
10Uniao Barbarense17110.650.630.67
11Bandeirante SP1590.600.710.50
12Rio Preto19110.580.330.80
13XV de Jau19110.580.560.60
14Rio Claro1780.470.560.38
15Marília1970.370.200.56
16Portuguesa Santista1950.260.200.33

Home / 2nd Half Conceded

#TeamMP⊕ ConcededØ AVG
1Desportivo Brasil870.88
2USAC760.86
3Itapirense860.75
4Bandeirante SP750.71
5União São João850.63
6Uniao Barbarense850.63
7Francana740.57
8Rio Claro950.56
9XV de Jau950.56
10EC São Bernardo840.50
11Paulista840.50
12Catanduva840.50
13Rio Branco SP840.50
14Rio Preto930.33
15Portuguesa Santista1020.20
16Marília1020.20

Away / 2nd Half Conceded

#TeamMP⊕ ConcededØ AVG
1Rio Branco SP791.29
2USAC881.00
3Itapirense771.00
4Francana881.00
5Catanduva760.86
6Rio Preto1080.80
7EC São Bernardo970.78
8Paulista970.78
9Desportivo Brasil750.71
10União São João750.71
11Uniao Barbarense960.67
12XV de Jau1060.60
13Marília950.56
14Bandeirante SP840.50
15Rio Claro830.38
16Portuguesa Santista930.33

2nd Half Defensive Insights

USAC concedes most in 2H — 0.93 conceded/game

Itapirense is #2 conceded 2H — 0.87 conceded/game

Rio Branco SP is #3 conceded 2H — 0.87 conceded/game

Portuguesa Santista has the tightest 2H defence — 0.26 conceded/game

Marília has the tightest 2H defence — 0.37 conceded/game

Rio Claro has the tightest 2H defence — 0.47 conceded/game

2ND HALF DEF. STATS

  • 16 teams
  • 2H conceded avg: 0.64 conceded/game
  • Home conceded 2H: 0.54 conceded/game
  • Away conceded 2H: 0.73 conceded/game
  • Teams avg ≥0.5 conceded 2H: 0% (0/16)

Paulista - A3 (Brazil) — Goals Conceded Analysis

Teams in the Paulista - A3 (Brazil) concede an average of 1.11 goals per game this season. Marília has the best defence, conceding only 10 goals (0.53/game), with 3 at home and 7 away. USAC has the most porous defence with 28 goals conceded (1.87/game).

Betting Angle — Defence Strength

A low goals-conceded average is a key indicator for Clean Sheet, Under 2.5, and Asian Handicap markets. Teams with a strong home defence and a weak away defence create value in venue-specific markets — always check the split before betting.

Statistics Tables — Brazil