Ligi kuu Bara — Home Advantage
Tanzania · 2026/27
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +45% | +45% | +45% | 3.00/0.50 | |
| 2 | +42% | +47% | +37% | 2.17/0.80 | |
| 3 | +35% | +31% | +38% | 3.00/1.75 | |
| 4 | +31% | +8% | +53% | 2.50/0.00 | |
| 5 | +30% | +77% | -17% | 1.25/0.57 | |
| 6 | +28% | +47% | +9% | 0.80/0.33 | |
| 7 | +28% | +14% | +41% | 1.83/0.80 | |
| 8 | +24% | +35% | +12% | 1.50/0.80 | |
| 9 | +17% | +55% | -20% | 2.25/1.00 | |
| 10 | +15% | -17% | +47% | 1.57/0.75 | |
| 11 | +3% | +5% | 0% | 2.40/2.20 | |
| 12 | +2% | -25% | +28% | 0.60/0.50 | |
| 13 | 0% | -20% | +20% | 1.20/1.00 | |
| 14 | -3% | -25% | +20% | 1.60/1.60 | |
| 15 | -4% | -23% | +15% | 0.67/0.40 | |
| 16 | -6% | +22% | -33% | 3.00/3.00 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania), the average home win rate is 54% compared to 26% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Namungo shows the strongest home advantage, winning 83% of home games versus just 0% away (a difference of +83%). At the other end, Kagera Sugar actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 0% versus 17% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +77% | 2.25 | 0.29 | |
| 2 | +55% | 2.75 | 0.80 | |
| 3 | +47% | 1.40 | 0.50 | |
| 4 | +47% | 1.67 | 0.60 | |
| 5 | +45% | 1.75 | 0.67 | |
| 6 | +35% | 1.25 | 0.60 | |
| 7 | +31% | 2.83 | 1.50 | |
| 8 | +22% | 2.80 | 1.80 | |
| 9 | +14% | 1.33 | 1.00 | |
| 10 | +8% | 1.17 | 1.00 | |
| 11 | +5% | 2.00 | 1.80 | |
| 12 | -17% | 0.71 | 1.00 | |
| 13 | -20% | 0.80 | 1.20 | |
| 14 | -23% | 0.50 | 0.80 | |
| 15 | -25% | 0.60 | 1.00 | |
| 16 | -25% | 0.60 | 1.00 |
Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
Geita Gold has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania), netting 2.25 goals/match at home versus 0.29 away — a Scoring Advantage of +77%. In contrast, Dodoma Jiji scores more away (1.00/match) than at home (0.60/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -25% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +53% | 0.67 | 2.20 | |
| 2 | +47% | 0.71 | 2.00 | |
| 3 | +45% | 0.75 | 2.00 | |
| 4 | +41% | 0.67 | 1.60 | |
| 5 | +38% | 0.33 | 0.75 | |
| 6 | +37% | 0.83 | 1.80 | |
| 7 | +28% | 1.40 | 2.50 | |
| 8 | +20% | 0.40 | 0.60 | |
| 9 | +20% | 0.80 | 1.20 | |
| 10 | +15% | 1.33 | 1.80 | |
| 11 | +12% | 1.25 | 1.60 | |
| 12 | +9% | 1.40 | 1.67 | |
| 13 | 0% | 0.80 | 0.80 | |
| 14 | -17% | 2.00 | 1.43 | |
| 15 | -20% | 1.50 | 1.00 | |
| 16 | -33% | 0.80 | 0.40 |
Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania) — Home Defence Analysis
Namungo has the best home defensive record in the Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania), conceding just 0.67 goals/match at home compared to 2.20 away — a Defence Advantage of +53%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Simba concedes more at home (0.80/match) than away (0.40/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | +76% | 1.50 | 0.20 | |
| 3 | +75% | 1.00 | 0.14 | |
| 4 | +54% | 1.67 | 0.50 | |
| 5 | +54% | 0.83 | 0.25 | |
| 6 | +50% | 0.50 | 0.17 | |
| 7 | +16% | 0.83 | 0.60 | |
| 8 | +9% | 0.60 | 0.50 | |
| 9 | +5% | 0.67 | 0.60 | |
| 10 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 11 | -6% | 0.67 | 0.75 | |
| 12 | -9% | 0.50 | 0.60 | |
| 13 | -9% | 0.33 | 0.40 | |
| 14 | -11% | 0.80 | 1.00 | |
| 15 | -11% | 0.40 | 0.50 | |
| 16 | -43% | 0.40 | 1.00 |
Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Mbeya City has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania), netting 0.50 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Tabora United shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.40/match at home against 1.00 away (-43%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.80 | |
| 2 | +66% | 0.17 | 0.80 | |
| 3 | +58% | 0.33 | 1.25 | |
| 4 | +45% | 0.25 | 0.67 | |
| 5 | +43% | 0.20 | 0.50 | |
| 6 | +38% | 0.33 | 0.75 | |
| 7 | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 8 | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 9 | +23% | 0.50 | 0.80 | |
| 10 | +19% | 0.80 | 1.17 | |
| 11 | +11% | 1.20 | 1.50 | |
| 12 | -11% | 0.50 | 0.40 | |
| 13 | -25% | 1.00 | 0.60 | |
| 14 | -37% | 1.25 | 0.57 | |
| 15 | -50% | 0.60 | 0.20 | |
| 16 | -100% | 0.17 | 0.00 |
Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Tabora United has the best home defensive record in the Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.80 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Young Africans struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.17/match at home versus 0.00 away (-100%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.80 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | +79% | 1.25 | 0.14 | |
| 3 | +43% | 2.00 | 0.80 | |
| 4 | +43% | 1.25 | 0.50 | |
| 5 | +35% | 1.25 | 0.60 | |
| 6 | +33% | 0.40 | 0.20 | |
| 7 | +25% | 0.83 | 0.50 | |
| 8 | +25% | 0.67 | 0.40 | |
| 9 | +14% | 1.00 | 0.75 | |
| 10 | +11% | 0.75 | 0.60 | |
| 11 | +8% | 1.17 | 1.00 | |
| 12 | -9% | 0.33 | 0.40 | |
| 13 | -20% | 0.17 | 0.25 | |
| 14 | -23% | 0.25 | 0.40 | |
| 15 | -41% | 0.17 | 0.40 | |
| 16 | -43% | 0.20 | 0.50 |
Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Pamba Jiji has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania), netting 0.80 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Kagera Sugar shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.20/match at home against 0.50 away (-43%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.20 | |
| 2 | +76% | 0.17 | 1.25 | |
| 3 | +64% | 0.17 | 0.75 | |
| 4 | +57% | 0.17 | 0.60 | |
| 5 | +47% | 0.50 | 1.40 | |
| 6 | +45% | 0.50 | 1.33 | |
| 7 | +38% | 0.60 | 1.33 | |
| 8 | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 9 | +7% | 0.75 | 0.86 | |
| 10 | +3% | 0.75 | 0.80 | |
| 11 | 0% | 0.20 | 0.20 | |
| 12 | -2% | 0.83 | 0.80 | |
| 13 | -9% | 0.60 | 0.50 | |
| 14 | -9% | 0.20 | 0.17 | |
| 15 | -11% | 0.50 | 0.40 | |
| 16 | -33% | 0.80 | 0.40 |
Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Dodoma Jiji has the best home defensive record in the Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.20 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Tabora United struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.80/match at home versus 0.40 away (-33%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.