EFL Trophy — Under 0.5 ~ 5.5 Tables
England · 2026/27
Under 2.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 2.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 50% | 100% | |
| 5 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 50% | 100% | |
| 6 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 50% | 100% | |
| 7 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 50% | 100% | |
| 8 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 9 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 10 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 11 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 12 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 13 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 14 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 15 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 16 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 17 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 18 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 19 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 20 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 21 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 22 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 23 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 24 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 25 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 26 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 27 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 28 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 29 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 33% | |
| 30 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 31 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 32 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 33% | |
| 33 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 100% | |
| 34 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 100% | |
| 35 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 36 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 37 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 38 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 39 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 40 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 51 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 52 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 53 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 54 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 55 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 56 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 57 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 58 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 59 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 2.5 Insights
League average
28%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which EFL Trophy Teams Have The Highest Under 2.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, AFC Wimbledon lead the EFL Trophy with a 67% Under 2.5 rate — 2 of their 3 completed fixtures have stayed within the 2.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 50% and away 100%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 26%, putting AFC Wimbledon ahead of the rest.
Port Vale and Rotherham rank second and third respectively. Port Vale recorded a 67% rate across 3 matches (2 stayed below), while Rotherham stand at 67% from 3 outings (2 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 2.5 fixtures in the EFL Trophy this term.
At the other end, Rochdale record the lowest Under 2.5 rate in the EFL Trophy at 0% — only 0 of their 3 fixtures have stayed under 2.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 2.5 Betting Angle — EFL Trophy
With a league-wide Under 2.5 rate of 26%, the EFL Trophy is not predominantly defensive in character. The top three clubs average 67%, sitting 41 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. AFC Wimbledon's fixtures have gone Under 2.5 in 67% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 0.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 0.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 4 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 5 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 6 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 7 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 8 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 9 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 10 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 11 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 12 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 13 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 14 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 15 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 16 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 17 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 18 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 19 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 20 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 25 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 27 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 29 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 30 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 32 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 33 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 34 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 35 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 36 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 37 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 38 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 39 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 40 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 51 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 52 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 53 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 54 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 55 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 56 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 57 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 58 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 59 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 0.5 Insights
League average
3%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which EFL Trophy Teams Have The Highest Under 0.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, AFC Wimbledon lead the EFL Trophy with a 33% Under 0.5 rate — 1 of their 3 completed fixtures have stayed within the 0.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 50% and away 0%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 2%, putting AFC Wimbledon ahead of the rest.
Arsenal U21 and Aston Villa U21 rank second and third respectively. Arsenal U21 recorded a 0% rate across 3 matches (0 stayed below), while Aston Villa U21 stand at 0% from 3 outings (0 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 0.5 fixtures in the EFL Trophy this term.
At the other end, Wycombe record the lowest Under 0.5 rate in the EFL Trophy at 0% — only 0 of their 3 fixtures have stayed under 0.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 0.5 Betting Angle — EFL Trophy
With a league-wide Under 0.5 rate of 2%, the EFL Trophy is not predominantly defensive in character. The top three clubs average 11%, sitting 9 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. AFC Wimbledon's fixtures have gone Under 0.5 in 33% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 1.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 1.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 6 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 7 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 8 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 9 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 10 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 11 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 12 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 33% | |
| 13 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 14 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 100% | |
| 15 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 16 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 17 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 18 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 19 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 20 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 25 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 27 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 29 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 30 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 32 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 33 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 34 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 35 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 36 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 37 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 38 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 39 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 40 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 51 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 52 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 53 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 54 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 55 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 56 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 57 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 58 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 59 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 1.5 Insights
League average
10%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which EFL Trophy Teams Have The Highest Under 1.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, AFC Wimbledon lead the EFL Trophy with a 33% Under 1.5 rate — 1 of their 3 completed fixtures have stayed within the 1.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 50% and away 0%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 9%, putting AFC Wimbledon ahead of the rest.
Doncaster and Newcastle United U21 rank second and third respectively. Doncaster recorded a 33% rate across 3 matches (1 stayed below), while Newcastle United U21 stand at 33% from 3 outings (1 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 1.5 fixtures in the EFL Trophy this term.
At the other end, Wycombe record the lowest Under 1.5 rate in the EFL Trophy at 0% — only 0 of their 3 fixtures have stayed under 1.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 1.5 Betting Angle — EFL Trophy
With a league-wide Under 1.5 rate of 9%, the EFL Trophy is not predominantly defensive in character. The top three clubs average 33%, sitting 24 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. AFC Wimbledon's fixtures have gone Under 1.5 in 33% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 3.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 3.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 2 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 3 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 7 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 8 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 9 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 10 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 11 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 12 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0% | 67% | |
| 13 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0% | 67% | |
| 14 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0% | 67% | |
| 15 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0% | 67% | |
| 16 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 50% | 100% | |
| 17 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 50% | 100% | |
| 18 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 50% | 100% | |
| 19 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 50% | 100% | |
| 20 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 21 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 22 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 23 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 24 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 25 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 26 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 27 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 28 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 29 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 30 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 31 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 32 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 33 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 34 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 35 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 36 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 37 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 38 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 39 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 40 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 41 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 33% | |
| 42 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 43 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 44 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 45 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 51 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 52 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 53 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 54 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 55 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 56 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 57 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 58 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 59 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 3.5 Insights
League average
44%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which EFL Trophy Teams Have The Highest Under 3.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, AFC Wimbledon lead the EFL Trophy with a 100% Under 3.5 rate — 3 of their 3 completed fixtures have stayed within the 3.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 100% and away 100%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 48%, putting AFC Wimbledon ahead of the rest.
Shrewsbury and Arsenal U21 rank second and third respectively. Shrewsbury recorded a 100% rate across 3 matches (3 stayed below), while Arsenal U21 stand at 67% from 3 outings (2 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 3.5 fixtures in the EFL Trophy this term.
At the other end, Rochdale record the lowest Under 3.5 rate in the EFL Trophy at 0% — only 0 of their 3 fixtures have stayed under 3.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 3.5 Betting Angle — EFL Trophy
With a league-wide Under 3.5 rate of 48%, the EFL Trophy shows a moderate lean toward compact scoreboards. The top three clubs average 89%, sitting 41 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. AFC Wimbledon's fixtures have gone Under 3.5 in 100% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 4.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 4.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 2 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 4 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 8 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 9 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 10 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 11 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 12 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 13 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 14 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 15 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 16 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 17 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 18 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 19 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 20 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 21 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 22 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 23 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 24 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0% | 67% | |
| 25 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0% | 67% | |
| 26 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 100% | 0% | |
| 27 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 50% | 100% | |
| 28 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 50% | 100% | |
| 29 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 30 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 31 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 32 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 33 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 34 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 35 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 36 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 37 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 38 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 39 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 40 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 41 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 42 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 43 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 44 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 45 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 46 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 47 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 48 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 49 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 50 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 51 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 52 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 33% | |
| 53 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 54 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 55 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 56 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 57 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 58 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 59 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 4.5 Insights
League average
60%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which EFL Trophy Teams Have The Highest Under 4.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, AFC Wimbledon lead the EFL Trophy with a 100% Under 4.5 rate — 3 of their 3 completed fixtures have stayed within the 4.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 100% and away 100%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 63%, putting AFC Wimbledon ahead of the rest.
Chelsea U21 and Exeter City rank second and third respectively. Chelsea U21 recorded a 100% rate across 3 matches (3 stayed below), while Exeter City stand at 100% from 3 outings (3 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 4.5 fixtures in the EFL Trophy this term.
At the other end, Rochdale record the lowest Under 4.5 rate in the EFL Trophy at 0% — only 0 of their 3 fixtures have stayed under 4.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 4.5 Betting Angle — EFL Trophy
With a league-wide Under 4.5 rate of 63%, the EFL Trophy frequently delivers low-scoring fixtures. The top three clubs average 100%, sitting 37 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. AFC Wimbledon's fixtures have gone Under 4.5 in 100% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 5.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 5.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 2 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 4 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 10 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 11 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 12 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 13 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 14 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 15 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 16 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 17 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 18 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 19 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 20 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 21 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 22 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 23 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 24 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 25 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 26 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 27 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 28 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 29 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 30 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 31 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 32 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 33 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 34 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 35 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 36 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 37 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0% | 67% | |
| 38 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 50% | 100% | |
| 39 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0% | 67% | |
| 40 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0% | 67% | |
| 41 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 50% | 100% | |
| 42 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 43 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 44 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 45 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 46 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 47 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 48 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 49 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 50 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 51 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 52 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 53 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 54 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 55 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 56 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 57 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 58 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 59 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 60 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 61 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 62 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 63 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 33% | |
| 64 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 5.5 Insights
League average
79%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which EFL Trophy Teams Have The Highest Under 5.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, AFC Wimbledon lead the EFL Trophy with a 100% Under 5.5 rate — 3 of their 3 completed fixtures have stayed within the 5.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 100% and away 100%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 87%, putting AFC Wimbledon ahead of the rest.
Aston Villa U21 and Blackpool rank second and third respectively. Aston Villa U21 recorded a 100% rate across 3 matches (3 stayed below), while Blackpool stand at 100% from 3 outings (3 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 5.5 fixtures in the EFL Trophy this term.
At the other end, Brighton U21 record the lowest Under 5.5 rate in the EFL Trophy at 33% — only 1 of their 3 fixtures have stayed under 5.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 33%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 5.5 Betting Angle — EFL Trophy
With a league-wide Under 5.5 rate of 87%, the EFL Trophy frequently delivers low-scoring fixtures. The top three clubs average 100%, sitting 13 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. AFC Wimbledon's fixtures have gone Under 5.5 in 100% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.