Super Liga — Home Advantage
Moldova · 2026/27
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  CSF Bălți | +30% | +56% | +4% | 0.44/0.13 |
| 2 |  Sheriff Tiraspol | +19% | +8% | +29% | 2.33/2.13 |
| 3 |  Milsami Orhei | +13% | -1% | +27% | 1.44/1.13 |
| 4 |  Politehnica UTM | +9% | -25% | +43% | 1.13/1.11 |
| 5 |  Petrocub | +7% | +16% | -1% | 2.22/1.50 |
| 6 |  Sireți | +7% | -8% | +22% | 0.88/0.67 |
| 7 |  Zimbru | -3% | +6% | -12% | 2.00/1.78 |
| 8 |  Dacia-Buiucani | -6% | +33% | -44% | 1.63/1.22 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
Super Liga (Moldova) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the Super Liga (Moldova), the average home win rate is 41% compared to 31% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Petrocub shows the strongest home advantage, winning 67% of home games versus just 38% away (a difference of +29%). At the other end, Politehnica UTM actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 25% versus 33% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CSF Bălți | +56% | 0.89 | 0.25 |
| 2 | Dacia-Buiucani | +33% | 1.75 | 0.89 |
| 3 | Petrocub | +16% | 2.22 | 1.63 |
| 4 | Sheriff Tiraspol | +8% | 2.67 | 2.25 |
| 5 | Zimbru | +6% | 2.13 | 1.89 |
| 6 | Milsami Orhei | -1% | 1.11 | 1.13 |
| 7 | Sireți | -8% | 0.75 | 0.89 |
| 8 | Politehnica UTM | -25% | 1.13 | 1.89 |
Super Liga (Moldova) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
CSF Bălți has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Super Liga (Moldova), netting 0.89 goals/match at home versus 0.25 away — a Scoring Advantage of +56%. In contrast, Politehnica UTM scores more away (1.89/match) than at home (1.13/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -25% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Politehnica UTM | +43% | 0.88 | 2.22 |
| 2 | Sheriff Tiraspol | +29% | 0.56 | 1.00 |
| 3 | Milsami Orhei | +27% | 1.00 | 1.75 |
| 4 | Sireți | +22% | 1.13 | 1.78 |
| 5 | CSF Bălți | +4% | 3.33 | 3.63 |
| 6 | Petrocub | -1% | 0.89 | 0.88 |
| 7 | Zimbru | -12% | 1.00 | 0.78 |
| 8 | Dacia-Buiucani | -44% | 2.00 | 0.78 |
Super Liga (Moldova) — Home Defence Analysis
Politehnica UTM has the best home defensive record in the Super Liga (Moldova), conceding just 0.88 goals/match at home compared to 2.22 away — a Defence Advantage of +43%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Dacia-Buiucani concedes more at home (2.00/match) than away (0.78/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CSF Bălți | +100% | 0.44 | 0.00 |
| 2 | Dacia-Buiucani | +70% | 0.63 | 0.11 |
| 3 | Milsami Orhei | +45% | 0.67 | 0.25 |
| 4 | Sireți | +38% | 0.25 | 0.11 |
| 5 | Petrocub | +19% | 0.56 | 0.38 |
| 6 | Sheriff Tiraspol | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 7 | Politehnica UTM | -1% | 0.88 | 0.89 |
| 8 | Zimbru | -23% | 0.63 | 1.00 |
Super Liga (Moldova) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, CSF Bălți has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Super Liga (Moldova), netting 0.44 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Zimbru shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.63/match at home against 1.00 away (-23%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Milsami Orhei | +77% | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| 2 | Zimbru | +56% | 0.13 | 0.44 |
| 3 | Sheriff Tiraspol | +38% | 0.11 | 0.25 |
| 4 | Politehnica UTM | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 |
| 5 | Sireți | +28% | 0.25 | 0.44 |
| 6 | Petrocub | +6% | 0.22 | 0.25 |
| 7 | CSF Bălți | +2% | 1.44 | 1.50 |
| 8 | Dacia-Buiucani | -50% | 1.00 | 0.33 |
Super Liga (Moldova) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Milsami Orhei has the best home defensive record in the Super Liga (Moldova), conceding just 0.11 goals/match at home compared to 0.88 away — a Defence Advantage of +77%. Dacia-Buiucani struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.00/match at home versus 0.33 away (-50%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CSF Bălți | +28% | 0.44 | 0.25 |
| 2 | Zimbru | +26% | 1.50 | 0.89 |
| 3 | Dacia-Buiucani | +18% | 1.13 | 0.78 |
| 4 | Sheriff Tiraspol | +14% | 1.67 | 1.25 |
| 5 | Petrocub | +14% | 1.67 | 1.25 |
| 6 | Sireți | -22% | 0.50 | 0.78 |
| 7 | Milsami Orhei | -33% | 0.44 | 0.88 |
| 8 | Politehnica UTM | -60% | 0.25 | 1.00 |
Super Liga (Moldova) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, CSF Bălți has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Super Liga (Moldova), netting 0.44 goals/match at home versus 0.25 away — a Scoring Advantage of +28%. At the other end, Politehnica UTM shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.25/match at home against 1.00 away (-60%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Politehnica UTM | +53% | 0.38 | 1.22 |
| 2 | Sheriff Tiraspol | +26% | 0.44 | 0.75 |
| 3 | Sireți | +21% | 0.88 | 1.33 |
| 4 | CSF Bălți | +6% | 1.89 | 2.13 |
| 5 | Milsami Orhei | -1% | 0.89 | 0.88 |
| 6 | Petrocub | -3% | 0.67 | 0.63 |
| 7 | Dacia-Buiucani | -38% | 1.00 | 0.44 |
| 8 | Zimbru | -45% | 0.88 | 0.33 |
Super Liga (Moldova) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Politehnica UTM has the best home defensive record in the Super Liga (Moldova), conceding just 0.38 goals/match at home compared to 1.22 away — a Defence Advantage of +53%. Zimbru struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.88/match at home versus 0.33 away (-45%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Moldova
- Cupa Home Advantage— Division Pro
- Liga 1 Home Advantage— Division Pro