Super Liga — BTTS
Moldova · 2026/27
Both Teams To Score (BTTS)
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% | Home% | Away% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Petrocub | 17 | 10 | 59% | 67% | 50% |
| 2 |  Milsami Orhei | 17 | 9 | 53% | 44% | 63% |
| 3 |  Zimbru | 17 | 9 | 53% | 63% | 44% |
| 4 |  Sireți | 17 | 9 | 53% | 63% | 44% |
| 5 |  Politehnica UTM | 17 | 9 | 53% | 25% | 78% |
| 6 |  Sheriff Tiraspol | 17 | 8 | 47% | 33% | 63% |
| 7 |  Dacia-Buiucani | 17 | 7 | 41% | 50% | 33% |
| 8 |  CSF Bălți | 17 | 7 | 41% | 56% | 25% |
Home / BTTS
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Petrocub | 9 | 6 | 67% |
| 2 | Zimbru | 8 | 5 | 63% |
| 3 | Sireți | 8 | 5 | 63% |
| 4 | CSF Bălți | 9 | 5 | 56% |
| 5 | Dacia-Buiucani | 8 | 4 | 50% |
| 6 | Milsami Orhei | 9 | 4 | 44% |
| 7 | Sheriff Tiraspol | 9 | 3 | 33% |
| 8 | Politehnica UTM | 8 | 2 | 25% |
Away / BTTS
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Politehnica UTM | 9 | 7 | 78% |
| 2 | Sheriff Tiraspol | 8 | 5 | 63% |
| 3 | Milsami Orhei | 8 | 5 | 63% |
| 4 | Petrocub | 8 | 4 | 50% |
| 5 | Zimbru | 9 | 4 | 44% |
| 6 | Sireți | 9 | 4 | 44% |
| 7 | Dacia-Buiucani | 9 | 3 | 33% |
| 8 | CSF Bălți | 8 | 2 | 25% |
Which teams are involved in the most BTTS games?
Petrocub has the highest BTTS rate in the league — 59%
Milsami Orhei is #2 for BTTS rate — 53%
Zimbru is #3 for BTTS rate — 53%
CSF Bălți has one of the lowest BTTS rates — 41%
Dacia-Buiucani has one of the lowest BTTS rates — 41%
Sheriff Tiraspol has one of the lowest BTTS rates — 47%
League BTTS Stats
- consists of 8 teams
- League BTTS rate: 50%
- Home BTTS rate: 50%
- Away BTTS rate: 50%
1st Half — BTTS Rate
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | % | Home% | Away% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Milsami Orhei | 17 | 3 | 18% | 11% | 25% |
| 2 | Politehnica UTM | 17 | 3 | 18% | 0% | 33% |
| 3 | Sheriff Tiraspol | 17 | 2 | 12% | 11% | 13% |
| 4 | Zimbru | 17 | 2 | 12% | 13% | 11% |
| 5 | CSF Bălți | 17 | 2 | 12% | 22% | 0% |
| 6 | Petrocub | 17 | 1 | 6% | 11% | 0% |
| 7 | Dacia-Buiucani | 17 | 1 | 6% | 13% | 0% |
| 8 | Sireți | 17 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Home / BTTS in 1st Half
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CSF Bălți | 9 | 2 | 22% |
| 2 | Zimbru | 8 | 1 | 13% |
| 3 | Dacia-Buiucani | 8 | 1 | 13% |
| 4 | Sheriff Tiraspol | 9 | 1 | 11% |
| 5 | Milsami Orhei | 9 | 1 | 11% |
| 6 | Petrocub | 9 | 1 | 11% |
| 7 | Sireți | 8 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 | Politehnica UTM | 8 | 0 | 0% |
Away / BTTS in 1st Half
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Politehnica UTM | 9 | 3 | 33% |
| 2 | Milsami Orhei | 8 | 2 | 25% |
| 3 | Sheriff Tiraspol | 8 | 1 | 13% |
| 4 | Zimbru | 9 | 1 | 11% |
| 5 | Petrocub | 8 | 0 | 0% |
| 6 | Dacia-Buiucani | 9 | 0 | 0% |
| 7 | Sireți | 9 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 | CSF Bălți | 8 | 0 | 0% |
1st Half BTTS Insights
Milsami Orhei has the highest BTTS rate in 1H — 18%
Politehnica UTM is #2 for BTTS in 1H — 18%
Sheriff Tiraspol is #3 for BTTS in 1H — 12%
Sireți rarely sees BTTS in 1H — 0%
Dacia-Buiucani rarely sees BTTS in 1H — 6%
Petrocub rarely sees BTTS in 1H — 6%
1ST HALF BTTS STATS
- 8 teams
- 1H BTTS league rate: 10%
- Home 1H BTTS rate: 10%
- Away 1H BTTS rate: 10%
- Teams with 1H BTTS ≥20%: 0% (0/8)
2nd Half — BTTS Rate
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | % | Home% | Away% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Petrocub | 17 | 8 | 47% | 56% | 38% |
| 2 | Sireți | 17 | 7 | 41% | 38% | 44% |
| 3 | Zimbru | 17 | 6 | 35% | 50% | 22% |
| 4 | Dacia-Buiucani | 17 | 6 | 35% | 38% | 33% |
| 5 | Politehnica UTM | 17 | 6 | 35% | 13% | 56% |
| 6 | Sheriff Tiraspol | 17 | 5 | 29% | 22% | 38% |
| 7 | Milsami Orhei | 17 | 4 | 24% | 33% | 13% |
| 8 | CSF Bălți | 17 | 4 | 24% | 22% | 25% |
Home / BTTS in 2nd Half
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Petrocub | 9 | 5 | 56% |
| 2 | Zimbru | 8 | 4 | 50% |
| 3 | Dacia-Buiucani | 8 | 3 | 38% |
| 4 | Sireți | 8 | 3 | 38% |
| 5 | Milsami Orhei | 9 | 3 | 33% |
| 6 | Sheriff Tiraspol | 9 | 2 | 22% |
| 7 | CSF Bălți | 9 | 2 | 22% |
| 8 | Politehnica UTM | 8 | 1 | 13% |
Away / BTTS in 2nd Half
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Politehnica UTM | 9 | 5 | 56% |
| 2 | Sireți | 9 | 4 | 44% |
| 3 | Sheriff Tiraspol | 8 | 3 | 38% |
| 4 | Petrocub | 8 | 3 | 38% |
| 5 | Dacia-Buiucani | 9 | 3 | 33% |
| 6 | CSF Bălți | 8 | 2 | 25% |
| 7 | Zimbru | 9 | 2 | 22% |
| 8 | Milsami Orhei | 8 | 1 | 13% |
2nd Half BTTS Insights
Petrocub has the highest BTTS rate in 2H — 47%
Sireți is #2 for BTTS in 2H — 41%
Zimbru is #3 for BTTS in 2H — 35%
CSF Bălți rarely sees BTTS in 2H — 24%
Milsami Orhei rarely sees BTTS in 2H — 24%
Sheriff Tiraspol rarely sees BTTS in 2H — 29%
2ND HALF BTTS STATS
- 8 teams
- 2H BTTS league rate: 34%
- Home 2H BTTS rate: 34%
- Away 2H BTTS rate: 34%
- Teams with 2H BTTS ≥40%: 25% (2/8)
Super Liga (Moldova) — BTTS (Both Teams To Score) Analysis
In the Super Liga (Moldova), both teams score in 100% of matches this season. Petrocub is involved in the most BTTS games with a rate of 59% (10 games), with 67% at home and 50% away. CSF Bălți has the lowest BTTS rate at 41%.
Betting Angle — BTTS Markets
BTTS Yes is most reliable when two high-BTTS teams meet. When a top-BTTS team faces a low-BTTS team, consider BTTS No — the defensive team may suppress the higher-BTTS side. Always combine with goals-conceded data for the full picture.
Statistics Tables — Moldova
- Cupa BTTS— Division Pro
- Liga 1 BTTS— Division Pro