Super League — Home Advantage
Malawi · 2026/27
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  MAFCO | +52% | +66% | +38% | 1.50/0.11 |
| 2 |  Red Lions | +48% | +18% | +77% | 1.90/0.33 |
| 3 |  Silver Strikers | +45% | +48% | +41% | 2.22/1.60 |
| 4 |  Nyasa Big Bullets | +42% | +12% | +73% | 2.56/1.90 |
| 5 |  Ekhaya | +40% | +21% | +59% | 2.11/0.60 |
| 6 |  Chitipa United | +36% | +18% | +54% | 2.10/0.44 |
| 7 |  Mitundu Baptist | +33% | +49% | +18% | 1.90/0.78 |
| 8 |  Masters FC | +29% | +43% | +16% | 1.88/0.80 |
| 9 |  Moyale Barracks | +24% | +35% | +13% | 1.78/0.90 |
| 10 |  Dedza Dynamos | +23% | +12% | +35% | 1.30/0.78 |
| 11 |  Blue Eagles | +15% | +19% | +10% | 2.30/1.33 |
| 12 |  Karonga United | +14% | -5% | +33% | 1.30/0.63 |
| 13 |  CIVO United | +7% | +14% | +1% | 1.11/1.20 |
| 14 |  Kamuzu Barracks | +5% | +25% | -15% | 1.10/0.67 |
| 15 |  Creck | -2% | +19% | -23% | 1.00/0.80 |
| 16 |  Be Forward Wanderers | -3% | -1% | -5% | 2.00/2.10 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
Super League (Malawi) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the Super League (Malawi), the average home win rate is 49% compared to 21% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Masters FC shows the strongest home advantage, winning 63% of home games versus just 10% away (a difference of +53%). At the other end, CIVO United actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 22% versus 40% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MAFCO | +66% | 1.10 | 0.22 |
| 2 | Mitundu Baptist | +49% | 1.30 | 0.44 |
| 3 | Silver Strikers | +48% | 2.00 | 0.70 |
| 4 | Masters FC | +43% | 1.50 | 0.60 |
| 5 | Moyale Barracks | +35% | 1.44 | 0.70 |
| 6 | Kamuzu Barracks | +25% | 1.10 | 0.67 |
| 7 | Ekhaya | +21% | 1.22 | 0.80 |
| 8 | Creck | +19% | 0.89 | 0.60 |
| 9 | Blue Eagles | +19% | 1.80 | 1.22 |
| 10 | Chitipa United | +18% | 0.80 | 0.56 |
| 11 | Red Lions | +18% | 0.80 | 0.56 |
| 12 | CIVO United | +14% | 0.67 | 0.50 |
| 13 | Nyasa Big Bullets | +12% | 1.67 | 1.30 |
| 14 | Dedza Dynamos | +12% | 0.70 | 0.56 |
| 15 | Be Forward Wanderers | -1% | 1.67 | 1.70 |
| 16 | Karonga United | -5% | 0.90 | 1.00 |
Super League (Malawi) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
MAFCO has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Super League (Malawi), netting 1.10 goals/match at home versus 0.22 away — a Scoring Advantage of +66%. In contrast, Karonga United scores more away (1.00/match) than at home (0.90/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -5% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Red Lions | +77% | 0.20 | 1.56 |
| 2 | Nyasa Big Bullets | +73% | 0.11 | 0.70 |
| 3 | Ekhaya | +59% | 0.33 | 1.30 |
| 4 | Chitipa United | +54% | 0.50 | 1.67 |
| 5 | Silver Strikers | +41% | 0.33 | 0.80 |
| 6 | MAFCO | +38% | 0.80 | 1.78 |
| 7 | Dedza Dynamos | +35% | 0.80 | 1.67 |
| 8 | Karonga United | +33% | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| 9 | Mitundu Baptist | +18% | 0.70 | 1.00 |
| 10 | Masters FC | +16% | 0.88 | 1.20 |
| 11 | Moyale Barracks | +13% | 1.00 | 1.30 |
| 12 | Blue Eagles | +10% | 1.00 | 1.22 |
| 13 | CIVO United | +1% | 0.89 | 0.90 |
| 14 | Be Forward Wanderers | -5% | 0.67 | 0.60 |
| 15 | Kamuzu Barracks | -15% | 1.50 | 1.11 |
| 16 | Creck | -23% | 1.44 | 0.90 |
Super League (Malawi) — Home Defence Analysis
Red Lions has the best home defensive record in the Super League (Malawi), conceding just 0.20 goals/match at home compared to 1.56 away — a Defence Advantage of +77%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Creck concedes more at home (1.44/match) than away (0.90/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MAFCO | +100% | 0.10 | 0.00 |
| 2 | Moyale Barracks | +63% | 0.89 | 0.20 |
| 3 | Kamuzu Barracks | +46% | 0.60 | 0.22 |
| 4 | Masters FC | +43% | 0.75 | 0.30 |
| 5 | Blue Eagles | +38% | 1.00 | 0.44 |
| 6 | Mitundu Baptist | +38% | 0.50 | 0.22 |
| 7 | Dedza Dynamos | +9% | 0.40 | 0.33 |
| 8 | Silver Strikers | +5% | 0.56 | 0.50 |
| 9 | Ekhaya | +5% | 0.56 | 0.50 |
| 10 | CIVO United | +5% | 0.33 | 0.30 |
| 11 | Karonga United | -2% | 0.60 | 0.63 |
| 12 | Chitipa United | -5% | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| 13 | Red Lions | -5% | 0.30 | 0.33 |
| 14 | Nyasa Big Bullets | -15% | 0.44 | 0.60 |
| 15 | Creck | -15% | 0.22 | 0.30 |
| 16 | Be Forward Wanderers | -25% | 0.67 | 1.10 |
Super League (Malawi) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, MAFCO has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Super League (Malawi), netting 0.10 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Be Forward Wanderers shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.67/match at home against 1.10 away (-25%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nyasa Big Bullets | +100% | 0.00 | 0.30 |
| 2 | Red Lions | +100% | 0.00 | 0.44 |
| 3 | Ekhaya | +100% | 0.00 | 0.30 |
| 4 | Silver Strikers | +69% | 0.11 | 0.60 |
| 5 | Dedza Dynamos | +38% | 0.40 | 0.89 |
| 6 | MAFCO | +32% | 0.40 | 0.78 |
| 7 | Moyale Barracks | +29% | 0.22 | 0.40 |
| 8 | Karonga United | +25% | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| 9 | Mitundu Baptist | +16% | 0.40 | 0.56 |
| 10 | Masters FC | +9% | 0.50 | 0.60 |
| 11 | Chitipa United | +5% | 0.30 | 0.33 |
| 12 | CIVO United | -5% | 0.33 | 0.30 |
| 13 | Blue Eagles | -9% | 0.40 | 0.33 |
| 14 | Be Forward Wanderers | -30% | 0.56 | 0.30 |
| 15 | Creck | -33% | 1.00 | 0.50 |
| 16 | Kamuzu Barracks | -34% | 0.90 | 0.44 |
Super League (Malawi) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Nyasa Big Bullets has the best home defensive record in the Super League (Malawi), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.30 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Kamuzu Barracks struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.90/match at home versus 0.44 away (-34%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Silver Strikers | +76% | 1.44 | 0.20 |
| 2 | MAFCO | +64% | 1.00 | 0.22 |
| 3 | Mitundu Baptist | +57% | 0.80 | 0.22 |
| 4 | Masters FC | +43% | 0.75 | 0.30 |
| 5 | Red Lions | +38% | 0.50 | 0.22 |
| 6 | Creck | +38% | 0.67 | 0.30 |
| 7 | Ekhaya | +38% | 0.67 | 0.30 |
| 8 | Nyasa Big Bullets | +27% | 1.22 | 0.70 |
| 9 | Be Forward Wanderers | +25% | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| 10 | CIVO United | +25% | 0.33 | 0.20 |
| 11 | Chitipa United | +22% | 0.70 | 0.44 |
| 12 | Dedza Dynamos | +15% | 0.30 | 0.22 |
| 13 | Kamuzu Barracks | +6% | 0.50 | 0.44 |
| 14 | Moyale Barracks | +5% | 0.56 | 0.50 |
| 15 | Blue Eagles | +1% | 0.80 | 0.78 |
| 16 | Karonga United | -11% | 0.30 | 0.38 |
Super League (Malawi) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Silver Strikers has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Super League (Malawi), netting 1.44 goals/match at home versus 0.20 away — a Scoring Advantage of +76%. At the other end, Karonga United shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.30/match at home against 0.38 away (-11%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chitipa United | +74% | 0.20 | 1.33 |
| 2 | Red Lions | +69% | 0.20 | 1.11 |
| 3 | Nyasa Big Bullets | +57% | 0.11 | 0.40 |
| 4 | Ekhaya | +50% | 0.33 | 1.00 |
| 5 | Be Forward Wanderers | +46% | 0.11 | 0.30 |
| 6 | Karonga United | +43% | 0.40 | 1.00 |
| 7 | MAFCO | +43% | 0.40 | 1.00 |
| 8 | Dedza Dynamos | +32% | 0.40 | 0.78 |
| 9 | Masters FC | +23% | 0.38 | 0.60 |
| 10 | Blue Eagles | +19% | 0.60 | 0.89 |
| 11 | Mitundu Baptist | +19% | 0.30 | 0.44 |
| 12 | Moyale Barracks | +7% | 0.78 | 0.90 |
| 13 | Kamuzu Barracks | +5% | 0.60 | 0.67 |
| 14 | CIVO United | +4% | 0.56 | 0.60 |
| 15 | Silver Strikers | -5% | 0.22 | 0.20 |
| 16 | Creck | -5% | 0.44 | 0.40 |
Super League (Malawi) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Chitipa United has the best home defensive record in the Super League (Malawi), conceding just 0.20 goals/match at home compared to 1.33 away — a Defence Advantage of +74%. Creck struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.44/match at home versus 0.40 away (-5%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.