MatchPulse
Ligat Ha'al

Ligat Ha'al — xG (Expected Goals)

Israel · 2026/27

Expected Goals (xG)

xG data available for 9 games
#TeamMPxGFxGF/gxGAxGA/gGFGADiff
1Maccabi Tel Aviv823.52.937.00.88298+5.5
2Maccabi Netanya817.62.2010.71.34109-7.6
3Maccabi Haifa815.31.929.81.232116+5.7
4Hapoel Tel Aviv915.11.677.80.87206+4.9
5Beitar Jerusalem913.91.5414.21.581310-0.9
6Hapoel Beer Sheva813.61.7011.71.472212+8.4
7Maccabi Petah Tikva813.11.6414.41.801421+0.9
8Bnei Sakhnin810.91.3710.71.3477-3.9
9Hapoel Haifa910.51.1715.81.751316+2.5
10Hapoel Katamon79.41.3414.82.121522+5.6
11Ironi Kiryat Shmona78.41.2113.11.87717-1.4
12Hapoel Ramat Gan77.91.1313.61.95720-0.9
13Ironi Tiberias77.81.1217.52.50913+1.2
14Hapoel Petah Tikva73.50.509.31.34414+0.5
xGF = xG For (created)xGA = xG Against (conceded)Diff = GF − xGF (over/under-performing)
xG Attack Ranking
Maccabi Tel AvivHigh xGF2.93
Maccabi NetanyaHigh xGF2.20
Maccabi HaifaHigh xGF1.92
Ironi TiberiasLow xGF1.12
Hapoel Ramat GanLow xGF1.13

LEAGUE xG STATS

14 teams with xG data
League avg xGF/g: 1.53
League avg xGA/g: 1.57
Best overperformer: Hapoel Beer Sheva (+8.4)
Biggest underperformer: Maccabi Netanya (-7.6)

Ligat Ha'al (Israel) — Expected Goals (xG) Analysis

The Ligat Ha'al (Israel) averages 1.53 xG per game this season. Maccabi Tel Aviv creates the most chances with 2.93 xGF per game, while Hapoel Petah Tikva creates the fewest with 0.50 xGF per game. Hapoel Beer Sheva is over-performing their xG (22 goals vs 13.6 xGF) — regression likely. Maccabi Netanya is under-performing (10 goals vs 17.6 xGF) — improvement expected.

Betting Angle — xG & Regression Markets

xG is the most powerful predictor of future performance — teams that consistently over-perform their xG (scoring more than expected) tend to regress. Look for under-performing high-xG teams as value opportunities in match result markets, especially Asian Handicap and Both Teams To Score.

Expected Goals (xG) — Israel