Copa Chile — Home Advantage
Chile · 2026/27
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +43% | +100% | -14% | 0.33/0.33 | |
| 2 | +39% | +27% | +50% | 2.00/0.60 | |
| 3 | +38% | +50% | +25% | 1.33/0.33 | |
| 4 | +37% | +29% | +45% | 2.00/1.00 | |
| 5 | +34% | +27% | +40% | 1.67/0.33 | |
| 6 | +27% | +43% | +11% | 1.00/0.00 | |
| 7 | +24% | -11% | +60% | 1.75/0.25 | |
| 8 | +23% | +13% | +33% | 2.40/1.40 | |
| 9 | +19% | +64% | -25% | 2.50/1.50 | |
| 10 | +19% | 0% | +38% | 0.33/0.00 | |
| 11 | +18% | +17% | +20% | 2.50/2.00 | |
| 12 | +18% | +50% | -14% | 1.00/1.00 | |
| 13 | +17% | +4% | +30% | 1.75/2.00 | |
| 14 | +13% | +7% | +20% | 2.50/1.75 | |
| 15 | +13% | 0% | +25% | 1.33/1.00 | |
| 16 | +12% | +27% | -3% | 3.00/2.00 | |
| 17 | +11% | +33% | -11% | 2.00/1.33 | |
| 18 | +10% | +20% | 0% | 2.60/2.00 | |
| 19 | +8% | +8% | +9% | 1.75/1.50 | |
| 20 | +8% | -5% | +20% | 2.20/2.40 | |
| 21 | +7% | +14% | 0% | 1.33/1.00 | |
| 22 | +7% | -20% | +33% | 0.00/0.00 | |
| 23 | +6% | +11% | 0% | 1.75/1.50 | |
| 24 | +4% | -25% | +33% | 1.00/0.33 | |
| 25 | 0% | +9% | -9% | 1.00/1.25 | |
| 26 | 0% | +9% | -9% | 1.33/1.33 | |
| 27 | -2% | -14% | +11% | 1.00/1.00 | |
| 28 | -7% | -33% | +20% | 1.00/0.33 | |
| 29 | -14% | 0% | -27% | 0.00/1.33 | |
| 30 | -24% | -40% | -8% | 1.00/1.75 | |
| 31 | -29% | +14% | -71% | 1.25/2.00 | |
| 32 | -47% | -67% | -27% | 0.00/1.67 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
Copa Chile (Chile) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the Copa Chile (Chile), the average home win rate is 42% compared to 31% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Antofagasta shows the strongest home advantage, winning 100% of home games versus just 50% away (a difference of +50%). At the other end, Recoleta actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 0% versus 33% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.67 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | +64% | 2.25 | 0.50 | |
| 3 | +50% | 1.00 | 0.33 | |
| 4 | +50% | 1.00 | 0.33 | |
| 5 | +43% | 1.67 | 0.67 | |
| 6 | +33% | 2.67 | 1.33 | |
| 7 | +29% | 2.25 | 1.25 | |
| 8 | +27% | 2.33 | 1.33 | |
| 9 | +27% | 1.40 | 0.80 | |
| 10 | +27% | 2.60 | 1.50 | |
| 11 | +20% | 2.40 | 1.60 | |
| 12 | +17% | 1.75 | 1.25 | |
| 13 | +14% | 2.00 | 1.50 | |
| 14 | +14% | 1.33 | 1.00 | |
| 15 | +13% | 1.80 | 1.40 | |
| 16 | +11% | 1.25 | 1.00 | |
| 17 | +9% | 1.50 | 1.25 | |
| 18 | +9% | 2.00 | 1.67 | |
| 19 | +8% | 1.75 | 1.50 | |
| 20 | +7% | 2.00 | 1.75 | |
| 21 | +4% | 1.75 | 1.60 | |
| 22 | 0% | 0.67 | 0.67 | |
| 23 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 24 | 0% | 0.33 | 0.33 | |
| 25 | -5% | 2.00 | 2.20 | |
| 26 | -11% | 1.00 | 1.25 | |
| 27 | -14% | 1.00 | 1.33 | |
| 28 | -20% | 0.67 | 1.00 | |
| 29 | -25% | 1.00 | 1.67 | |
| 30 | -33% | 0.33 | 0.67 | |
| 31 | -40% | 0.75 | 1.75 | |
| 32 | -67% | 0.33 | 1.67 |
Copa Chile (Chile) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
Cobresal has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Copa Chile (Chile), netting 0.67 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. In contrast, Recoleta scores more away (1.67/match) than at home (0.33/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -67% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +60% | 0.50 | 2.00 | |
| 2 | +50% | 0.60 | 1.80 | |
| 3 | +45% | 0.75 | 2.00 | |
| 4 | +40% | 1.00 | 2.33 | |
| 5 | +38% | 1.33 | 3.00 | |
| 6 | +33% | 1.67 | 3.33 | |
| 7 | +33% | 0.60 | 1.20 | |
| 8 | +33% | 1.33 | 2.67 | |
| 9 | +30% | 0.75 | 1.40 | |
| 10 | +25% | 1.00 | 1.67 | |
| 11 | +25% | 1.00 | 1.67 | |
| 12 | +20% | 1.33 | 2.00 | |
| 13 | +20% | 0.50 | 0.75 | |
| 14 | +20% | 1.00 | 1.50 | |
| 15 | +20% | 0.80 | 1.20 | |
| 16 | +11% | 1.33 | 1.67 | |
| 17 | +11% | 2.67 | 3.33 | |
| 18 | +9% | 1.25 | 1.50 | |
| 19 | 0% | 0.80 | 0.80 | |
| 20 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 21 | 0% | 1.67 | 1.67 | |
| 22 | -3% | 0.80 | 0.75 | |
| 23 | -8% | 1.75 | 1.50 | |
| 24 | -9% | 2.00 | 1.67 | |
| 25 | -9% | 1.50 | 1.25 | |
| 26 | -11% | 1.67 | 1.33 | |
| 27 | -14% | 1.33 | 1.00 | |
| 28 | -14% | 1.33 | 1.00 | |
| 29 | -25% | 1.25 | 0.75 | |
| 30 | -27% | 2.33 | 1.33 | |
| 31 | -27% | 2.33 | 1.33 | |
| 32 | -71% | 1.50 | 0.25 |
Copa Chile (Chile) — Home Defence Analysis
Cobreloa has the best home defensive record in the Copa Chile (Chile), conceding just 0.50 goals/match at home compared to 2.00 away — a Defence Advantage of +60%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Union La Calera concedes more at home (1.50/match) than away (0.25/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.33 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | +100% | 0.67 | 0.00 | |
| 3 | +100% | 0.67 | 0.00 | |
| 4 | +100% | 0.33 | 0.00 | |
| 5 | +100% | 0.25 | 0.00 | |
| 6 | +50% | 1.00 | 0.33 | |
| 7 | +50% | 1.00 | 0.33 | |
| 8 | +40% | 1.40 | 0.60 | |
| 9 | +33% | 0.67 | 0.33 | |
| 10 | +33% | 0.50 | 0.25 | |
| 11 | +33% | 0.50 | 0.25 | |
| 12 | +33% | 0.50 | 0.25 | |
| 13 | +20% | 0.75 | 0.50 | |
| 14 | +11% | 1.00 | 0.80 | |
| 15 | +3% | 0.80 | 0.75 | |
| 16 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 17 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 18 | 0% | 0.75 | 0.75 | |
| 19 | 0% | 0.33 | 0.33 | |
| 20 | 0% | 0.20 | 0.20 | |
| 21 | 0% | 0.33 | 0.33 | |
| 22 | -14% | 0.75 | 1.00 | |
| 23 | -14% | 0.60 | 0.80 | |
| 24 | -20% | 0.50 | 0.75 | |
| 25 | -33% | 0.33 | 0.67 | |
| 26 | -33% | 0.40 | 0.80 | |
| 27 | -33% | 0.33 | 0.67 | |
| 28 | -33% | 0.33 | 0.67 | |
| 29 | -50% | 0.33 | 1.00 | |
| 30 | -100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 31 | -100% | 0.00 | 0.33 | |
| 32 | -100% | 0.00 | 0.33 |
Copa Chile (Chile) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Deportes Temuco has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Copa Chile (Chile), netting 0.33 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Rangers de Talca shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.00/match at home against 0.33 away (-100%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 2 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.33 | |
| 3 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.60 | |
| 4 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.33 | |
| 5 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| 6 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.40 | |
| 7 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.40 | |
| 8 | +60% | 0.20 | 0.80 | |
| 9 | +50% | 0.33 | 1.00 | |
| 10 | +50% | 0.33 | 1.00 | |
| 11 | +43% | 0.67 | 1.67 | |
| 12 | +33% | 0.20 | 0.40 | |
| 13 | +33% | 0.33 | 0.67 | |
| 14 | +20% | 0.67 | 1.00 | |
| 15 | +20% | 0.67 | 1.00 | |
| 16 | +11% | 0.40 | 0.50 | |
| 17 | 0% | 0.75 | 0.75 | |
| 18 | 0% | 0.25 | 0.25 | |
| 19 | 0% | 0.67 | 0.67 | |
| 20 | 0% | 0.33 | 0.33 | |
| 21 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 22 | -11% | 1.67 | 1.33 | |
| 23 | -33% | 1.33 | 0.67 | |
| 24 | -33% | 0.67 | 0.33 | |
| 25 | -50% | 0.75 | 0.25 | |
| 26 | -60% | 1.33 | 0.33 | |
| 27 | -60% | 1.33 | 0.33 | |
| 28 | -100% | 1.50 | 0.00 | |
| 29 | -100% | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 30 | -100% | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 31 | -100% | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 32 | -100% | 0.33 | 0.00 |
Copa Chile (Chile) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Deportes Iquique has the best home defensive record in the Copa Chile (Chile), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.50 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Deportes Copiapo struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.33/match at home versus 0.00 away (-100%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.33 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | +100% | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 3 | +75% | 1.75 | 0.25 | |
| 4 | +67% | 1.67 | 0.33 | |
| 5 | +56% | 1.75 | 0.50 | |
| 6 | +41% | 1.80 | 0.75 | |
| 7 | +40% | 1.40 | 0.60 | |
| 8 | +33% | 1.20 | 0.60 | |
| 9 | +33% | 0.67 | 0.33 | |
| 10 | +33% | 0.67 | 0.33 | |
| 11 | +25% | 1.67 | 1.00 | |
| 12 | +25% | 1.25 | 0.75 | |
| 13 | +25% | 1.25 | 0.75 | |
| 14 | +25% | 1.67 | 1.00 | |
| 15 | +14% | 1.00 | 0.75 | |
| 16 | +11% | 1.25 | 1.00 | |
| 17 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 18 | 0% | 1.40 | 1.40 | |
| 19 | 0% | 0.67 | 0.67 | |
| 20 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 21 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 22 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 23 | 0% | 0.67 | 0.67 | |
| 24 | 0% | 0.33 | 0.33 | |
| 25 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 26 | 0% | 1.50 | 1.50 | |
| 27 | -3% | 0.75 | 0.80 | |
| 28 | -33% | 0.33 | 0.67 | |
| 29 | -50% | 0.33 | 1.00 | |
| 30 | -60% | 0.33 | 1.33 | |
| 31 | -67% | 0.25 | 1.25 | |
| 32 | -100% | 0.00 | 1.00 |
Copa Chile (Chile) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Union Espanola has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Copa Chile (Chile), netting 0.33 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Recoleta shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.00/match at home against 1.00 away (-100%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.75 | |
| 2 | +71% | 0.25 | 1.50 | |
| 3 | +67% | 0.25 | 1.25 | |
| 4 | +43% | 0.67 | 1.67 | |
| 5 | +40% | 0.60 | 1.40 | |
| 6 | +33% | 0.75 | 1.50 | |
| 7 | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 8 | +33% | 1.00 | 2.00 | |
| 9 | +33% | 0.33 | 0.67 | |
| 10 | +33% | 1.00 | 2.00 | |
| 11 | +33% | 1.00 | 2.00 | |
| 12 | +33% | 0.67 | 1.33 | |
| 13 | +25% | 1.00 | 1.67 | |
| 14 | +14% | 0.60 | 0.80 | |
| 15 | +14% | 0.75 | 1.00 | |
| 16 | +3% | 0.75 | 0.80 | |
| 17 | 0% | 0.67 | 0.67 | |
| 18 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 19 | 0% | 1.33 | 1.33 | |
| 20 | 0% | 0.75 | 0.75 | |
| 21 | 0% | 0.67 | 0.67 | |
| 22 | 0% | 0.75 | 0.75 | |
| 23 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 24 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 25 | -20% | 0.60 | 0.40 | |
| 26 | -20% | 0.60 | 0.40 | |
| 27 | -20% | 0.75 | 0.50 | |
| 28 | -20% | 1.00 | 0.67 | |
| 29 | -20% | 1.00 | 0.67 | |
| 30 | -23% | 0.40 | 0.25 | |
| 31 | -33% | 1.33 | 0.67 | |
| 32 | -60% | 1.00 | 0.25 |
Copa Chile (Chile) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Coquimbo Unido has the best home defensive record in the Copa Chile (Chile), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.75 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Union La Calera struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.00/match at home versus 0.25 away (-60%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Chile
- Copa De La Liga Home Advantage— Division Pro
- Primera B Home Advantage— Division Pro
- Primera División Home Advantage— Division Gold
- Segunda División Home Advantage— Division Pro
- Super Cup Home Advantage— Division Pro