Copa Chile — Form Table
Chile · 2026/27
Combined Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 5 | +12 | 21 | WWWWWWW | 3.00 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 2.43 | 86% | 71% | 3.14 | ||
| 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 6 | +11 | 19 | WWWWDWW | 2.71 | 43% | 0% | 57% | 2.43 | 71% | 43% | 3.29 | ||
| 3 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 7 | +4 | 16 | WWWDWLW | 2.29 | 43% | 14% | 43% | 1.57 | 57% | 43% | 2.57 | ||
| 4 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 4 | +8 | 15 | WWWWWLL | 2.14 | 57% | 29% | 14% | 1.71 | 86% | 29% | 2.29 | ||
| 5 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 5 | +4 | 15 | DWDDWWW | 2.14 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 1.29 | 71% | 29% | 2.00 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 6 | +5 | 14 | LDWDWWW | 2.00 | 71% | 14% | 29% | 1.57 | 57% | 57% | 2.43 | ||
| 7 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 10 | +2 | 14 | WWWWLDD | 2.00 | 14% | 29% | 71% | 1.71 | 86% | 71% | 3.14 | ||
| 8 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 5 | +9 | 13 | DWWDWDD | 1.86 | 57% | 14% | 43% | 2.00 | 71% | 43% | 2.71 | ||
| 9 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 7 | +2 | 13 | WWWLWDL | 1.86 | 29% | 29% | 57% | 1.29 | 57% | 57% | 2.29 | ||
| 10 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 13 | WLWWWDL | 1.86 | 43% | 29% | 29% | 1.14 | 57% | 14% | 2.00 | ||
| 11 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 11 | WWDDWLL | 1.57 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.43 | 86% | 71% | 3.14 | ||
| 12 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | +3 | 10 | WLDLWW | 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 2.00 | 83% | 83% | 3.50 | ||
| 13 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 10 | WWDWLLL | 1.43 | 29% | 14% | 71% | 1.29 | 71% | 71% | 2.71 | ||
| 14 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 9 | DLWDWDL | 1.29 | 14% | 29% | 71% | 1.43 | 86% | 57% | 3.00 | ||
| 15 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 9 | WWLWLLL | 1.29 | 29% | 43% | 29% | 1.00 | 86% | 43% | 2.29 | ||
| 16 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 8 | WDLDWL | 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.83 | 100% | 67% | 3.67 | ||
| 17 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 8 | LWLDWLD | 1.14 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 1.29 | 71% | 57% | 2.57 | ||
| 18 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 | DWLDWLL | 1.14 | 43% | 14% | 57% | 1.14 | 71% | 57% | 2.29 | ||
| 19 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 7 | WLWLDL | 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 1.00 | 83% | 33% | 2.33 | ||
| 20 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 7 | LDWWLL | 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 1.17 | 50% | 50% | 2.83 | ||
| 21 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 10 | +1 | 6 | LDDLDW | 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 1.83 | 83% | 67% | 3.50 | ||
| 22 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 6 | LLWLLW | 1.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 1.17 | 83% | 50% | 2.67 | ||
| 23 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 6 | WLWLLL | 1.00 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 0.67 | 50% | 33% | 1.83 | ||
| 24 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 5 | DWDLLL | 0.83 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0.67 | 83% | 17% | 2.00 | ||
| 25 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 5 | LWLDDL | 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 1.00 | 83% | 67% | 2.83 | ||
| 26 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 4 | LLDLWL | 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 1.33 | 83% | 67% | 3.33 | ||
| 27 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 4 | WLDLLL | 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 0.67 | 83% | 67% | 2.50 | ||
| 28 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 4 | WDLLLL | 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 0.50 | 67% | 50% | 2.17 | ||
| 29 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 18 | -11 | 3 | LWLLLL | 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 1.17 | 100% | 100% | 4.17 | ||
| 30 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 2 | LDLLDL | 0.33 | 17% | 83% | 17% | 0.33 | 33% | 17% | 1.50 | ||
| 31 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 1 | LDLLLL | 0.17 | 17% | 67% | 33% | 0.33 | 50% | 50% | 2.50 | ||
| 32 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 0 | LLLLLL | 0.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 0.83 | 83% | 83% | 3.33 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Who Is in the Best Form in the Last 7 Games?
O'Higgins leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 games.
Antofagasta is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 86% and 2.71 PPG.
Nublense is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 71% and 2.29 PPG.
Magallanes is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
San Marcos de Arica is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 0% and 0.17 PPG.
Cobresal has the worst form over the last 7 games with just 0% wins and only 0.33 PPG.
- •The Copa Chile (Chile) Last 7 Games Form Table covers 32 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent games.
- •Win rate across the Copa Chile in this period is 39%
- •Teams score an average of 1.31 goals per game and concede 1.39 — a combined 2.70 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 54% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 26% of games.
Copa Chile (Chile) Last 7 Games — Form Table Insights
O'Higgins, Antofagasta and Nublense have been the standout performers in the Copa Chile (Chile) over the last 7 games, leading the form table with 3.00, 2.71 and 2.29 PPG respectively. Across the Copa Chile, teams score an average of 1.31 goals and concede 1.39 per game — a combined 2.70 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 54% of fixtures while 26% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Magallanes and San Marcos de Arica have struggled in recent games, collecting just 0.00 and 0.17 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the Copa Chile.
Home Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 4 | +9 | 15 | WWWWW | 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 2.60 | 80% | 60% | 3.40 | ||
| 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 4 | +8 | 13 | WDWWW | 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 2.40 | 80% | 80% | 3.20 | ||
| 3 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3 | +6 | 12 | WWWWL | 2.40 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 1.80 | 80% | 20% | 2.40 | ||
| 4 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 4 | +6 | 11 | DDWWW | 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 2.00 | 100% | 40% | 2.80 | ||
| 5 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | +5 | 10 | WDWW | 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 1.75 | 75% | 50% | 2.25 | ||
| 6 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 5 | +4 | 10 | WDWW | 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 2.25 | 75% | 75% | 3.50 | ||
| 7 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 4 | +4 | 10 | WWWD | 2.50 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 2.00 | 75% | 75% | 3.00 | ||
| 8 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | +4 | 10 | DWWWL | 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 1.40 | 80% | 20% | 2.00 | ||
| 9 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 3 | +6 | 8 | WDWD | 2.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 2.25 | 100% | 50% | 3.00 | ||
| 10 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | +4 | 7 | WWLD | 1.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 1.75 | 75% | 25% | 2.50 | ||
| 11 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 7 | WDWL | 1.75 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 1.75 | 75% | 75% | 3.00 | ||
| 12 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 7 | DWWL | 1.75 | 75% | 25% | 25% | 1.00 | 50% | 25% | 1.50 | ||
| 13 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 7 | LWWD | 1.75 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 1.25 | 50% | 50% | 2.25 | ||
| 14 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | +3 | 6 | WLW | 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.67 | 100% | 100% | 4.33 | ||
| 15 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 3 | +4 | 5 | DDW | 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 2.33 | 100% | 67% | 3.33 | ||
| 16 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 5 | LDWD | 1.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 3.50 | ||
| 17 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 4 | LDW | 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 67% | 4.00 | ||
| 18 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 4 | DLWL | 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 1.50 | 75% | 75% | 3.00 | ||
| 19 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 | WDL | 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 1.00 | 67% | 33% | 2.00 | ||
| 20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 | WDL | 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 1.00 | 67% | 33% | 2.00 | ||
| 21 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 4 | DWL | 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 1.33 | 67% | 67% | 3.00 | ||
| 22 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 4 | LWDL | 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 0.75 | 50% | 50% | 2.50 | ||
| 23 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 | LWL | 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 1.00 | 67% | 67% | 2.33 | ||
| 24 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 | LWL | 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 1.00 | 100% | 33% | 2.33 | ||
| 25 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 | LWL | 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 1.00 | 67% | 33% | 2.33 | ||
| 26 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 | WLL | 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 1.67 | 100% | 100% | 4.33 | ||
| 27 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 3 | WLL | 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 1.67 | ||
| 28 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 | LLD | 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 0.67 | 33% | 33% | 2.00 | ||
| 29 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 1 | DLL | 0.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 1.67 | ||
| 30 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 | LLL | 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 0.67 | 67% | 67% | 2.33 | ||
| 31 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 | LLL | 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 0.67 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | ||
| 32 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 0 | LLL | 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 0.33 | 67% | 67% | 2.67 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms? (Last 7 Home Games)
Antofagasta leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 home games.
Colo Colo is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 80% and 2.60 PPG.
Coquimbo Unido is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 75% and 2.50 PPG.
Recoleta is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Union Espanola is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Magallanes has the worst form over the last 7 home games with just 0% wins and only 0.00 PPG.
- •The Copa Chile (Chile) Home Form Table (Last 7) covers 32 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent home games.
- •Win rate across the Copa Chile in this period is 45%
- •Teams score an average of 1.52 goals per game and concede 1.21 — a combined 2.73 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 54% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 25% of games.
Copa Chile (Chile) — Home Form Table Insights (Last 7 Home Games)
Antofagasta, Colo Colo and Coquimbo Unido have been the standout performers in the Copa Chile (Chile) over the last 7 home games, leading the form table with 3.00, 2.60 and 2.50 PPG respectively. Across the Copa Chile, teams score an average of 1.52 goals and concede 1.21 per game — a combined 2.73 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 54% of fixtures while 25% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Recoleta and Union Espanola have struggled in recent home games, collecting just 0.00 and 0.00 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the Copa Chile.
Away Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 6 | +5 | 12 | LWWWW | 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 2.20 | 80% | 80% | 3.40 | ||
| 2 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 4 | +4 | 10 | WWLDW | 2.00 | 80% | 20% | 20% | 1.60 | 60% | 60% | 2.40 | ||
| 3 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 7 | +1 | 10 | DWWWL | 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 1.60 | 60% | 40% | 3.00 | ||
| 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 1 | +5 | 8 | WDWD | 2.00 | 75% | 25% | 25% | 1.50 | 50% | 25% | 1.75 | ||
| 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 8 | DWWD | 2.00 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 1.50 | 50% | 25% | 2.25 | ||
| 6 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 8 | WDDW | 2.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 1.25 | 75% | 25% | 2.00 | ||
| 7 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 7 | DLWWL | 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 1.40 | 100% | 40% | 2.60 | ||
| 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 7 | WWLD | 1.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 1.75 | 100% | 75% | 3.25 | ||
| 9 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 7 | WDWL | 1.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 1.75 | 100% | 75% | 3.25 | ||
| 10 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 | WWLL | 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 1.50 | 75% | 75% | 3.00 | ||
| 11 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6 | WLWL | 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | ||
| 12 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 6 | LWWL | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0.50 | 25% | 0% | 1.25 | ||
| 13 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 5 | WDD | 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.67 | 100% | 67% | 3.00 | ||
| 14 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | LDWD | 1.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 1.25 | 75% | 50% | 2.50 | ||
| 15 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 | WDL | 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.67 | 100% | 67% | 3.33 | ||
| 16 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 | DLW | 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 1.33 | 67% | 67% | 2.67 | ||
| 17 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 4 | WDL | 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0.67 | 67% | 33% | 2.00 | ||
| 18 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 | DLWL | 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 1.25 | 75% | 75% | 3.25 | ||
| 19 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 | LLW | 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 1.33 | 67% | 67% | 3.00 | ||
| 20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 | LWL | 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 2.67 | ||
| 21 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 | LWL | 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 1.00 | 100% | 33% | 2.67 | ||
| 22 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 3 | WLL | 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0.33 | 33% | 0% | 1.33 | ||
| 23 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 3 | LWLLL | 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 0.80 | 100% | 60% | 2.60 | ||
| 24 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 1 | LLD | 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.67 | 100% | 100% | 4.33 | ||
| 25 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 1 | LLDL | 0.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.25 | 100% | 100% | 3.25 | ||
| 26 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 1 | LDL | 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 1.33 | 67% | 67% | 3.67 | ||
| 27 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 1 | LDL | 0.33 | 33% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 33% | 0% | 1.00 | ||
| 28 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 1 | DLL | 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 0.67 | 100% | 67% | 2.67 | ||
| 29 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 1 | DLL | 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 0.33 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | ||
| 30 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 0 | LLL | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.33 | ||
| 31 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 0 | LLL | 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 0.67 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | ||
| 32 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 | LLL | 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 0.33 | 67% | 67% | 3.33 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms? (Last 7 Away Games)
O'Higgins leads the form table with 80% wins and 2.40 PPG in the last 7 away games.
Colo Colo is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 60% and 2.00 PPG.
Universidad de Chile is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 60% and 2.00 PPG.
San Marcos de Arica is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Santiago Wanderers is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Magallanes has the worst form over the last 7 away games with just 0% wins and only 0.00 PPG.
- •The Copa Chile (Chile) Away Form Table (Last 7) covers 32 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent away games.
- •Win rate across the Copa Chile in this period is 33%
- •Teams score an average of 1.21 goals per game and concede 1.52 — a combined 2.73 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 54% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 26% of games.
Copa Chile (Chile) — Away Form Table Insights (Last 7 Away Games)
O'Higgins, Colo Colo and Universidad de Chile have been the standout performers in the Copa Chile (Chile) over the last 7 away games, leading the form table with 2.40, 2.00 and 2.00 PPG respectively. Across the Copa Chile, teams score an average of 1.21 goals and concede 1.52 per game — a combined 2.73 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 54% of fixtures while 26% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, San Marcos de Arica and Santiago Wanderers have struggled in recent away games, collecting just 0.00 and 0.00 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the Copa Chile.
Form Tables — Chile
- Copa De La Liga Form Table— Division Pro
- Primera B Form Table— Division Pro
- Primera División Form Table— Division Gold
- Segunda División Form Table— Division Pro
- Super Cup Form Table— Division Pro