MatchPulse
1. Division

1. Division — BTTS

Denmark · 2026/27

Both Teams To Score (BTTS)

#TeamMPBTTSBTTS%Home%Away%
1Hobro131077%71%83%
2Hvidovre131077%83%71%
3Kolding IF131077%71%83%
4Esbjerg13969%86%50%
5Vejle13862%83%43%
6Vendsyssel FF13862%33%86%
7Aalborg13862%43%83%
8HB Koge13862%67%57%
9Hillerød13754%67%43%
10AB Copenhagen13646%33%57%
11FC Fredericia13646%43%50%
12Aarhus Fremad13646%57%33%

Home / BTTS

#TeamMPBTTS%
1Esbjerg7686%
2Vejle6583%
3Hvidovre6583%
4Hobro7571%
5Kolding IF7571%
6HB Koge6467%
7Hillerød6467%
8Aarhus Fremad7457%
9Aalborg7343%
10FC Fredericia7343%
11Vendsyssel FF6233%
12AB Copenhagen6233%

Away / BTTS

#TeamMPBTTS%
1Vendsyssel FF7686%
2Aalborg6583%
3Hobro6583%
4Kolding IF6583%
5Hvidovre7571%
6AB Copenhagen7457%
7HB Koge7457%
8Esbjerg6350%
9FC Fredericia6350%
10Vejle7343%
11Hillerød7343%
12Aarhus Fremad6233%

Which teams are involved in the most BTTS games?

Hobro has the highest BTTS rate in the league — 77%

Hvidovre is #2 for BTTS rate — 77%

Kolding IF is #3 for BTTS rate — 77%

Aarhus Fremad has one of the lowest BTTS rates — 46%

FC Fredericia has one of the lowest BTTS rates — 46%

AB Copenhagen has one of the lowest BTTS rates — 46%

League BTTS Stats

  • consists of 12 teams
  • League BTTS rate: 62%
  • Home BTTS rate: 62%
  • Away BTTS rate: 62%

1st Half — BTTS Rate

#TeamMPBTTS%Home%Away%
1Vejle13538%50%29%
2Aalborg13431%14%50%
3Hobro13431%14%50%
4Kolding IF13431%29%33%
5Esbjerg13323%29%17%
6HB Koge13323%33%14%
7AB Copenhagen13215%0%29%
8FC Fredericia13215%29%0%
9Hillerød13215%17%14%
10Vendsyssel FF1318%17%0%
11Hvidovre1318%17%0%
12Aarhus Fremad1318%0%17%

Home / BTTS in 1st Half

#TeamMPBTTS%
1Vejle6350%
2HB Koge6233%
3Esbjerg7229%
4FC Fredericia7229%
5Kolding IF7229%
6Vendsyssel FF6117%
7Hvidovre6117%
8Hillerød6117%
9Aalborg7114%
10Hobro7114%
11AB Copenhagen600%
12Aarhus Fremad700%

Away / BTTS in 1st Half

#TeamMPBTTS%
1Aalborg6350%
2Hobro6350%
3Kolding IF6233%
4Vejle7229%
5AB Copenhagen7229%
6Esbjerg6117%
7Aarhus Fremad6117%
8HB Koge7114%
9Hillerød7114%
10Vendsyssel FF700%
11FC Fredericia600%
12Hvidovre700%

1st Half BTTS Insights

Vejle has the highest BTTS rate in 1H — 38%

Aalborg is #2 for BTTS in 1H — 31%

Hobro is #3 for BTTS in 1H — 31%

Aarhus Fremad rarely sees BTTS in 1H — 8%

Hvidovre rarely sees BTTS in 1H — 8%

Vendsyssel FF rarely sees BTTS in 1H — 8%

1ST HALF BTTS STATS

  • 12 teams
  • 1H BTTS league rate: 21%
  • Home 1H BTTS rate: 21%
  • Away 1H BTTS rate: 21%
  • Teams with 1H BTTS ≥20%: 50% (6/12)

2nd Half — BTTS Rate

#TeamMPBTTS%Home%Away%
1Esbjerg13862%71%50%
2HB Koge13646%33%57%
3Vejle13538%50%29%
4Hobro13538%29%50%
5Hvidovre13538%33%43%
6Aalborg13431%14%50%
7Kolding IF13323%43%0%
8Aarhus Fremad13323%43%0%
9Hillerød13323%33%14%
10Vendsyssel FF13215%0%29%
11AB Copenhagen13215%0%29%
12FC Fredericia13215%14%17%

Home / BTTS in 2nd Half

#TeamMPBTTS%
1Esbjerg7571%
2Vejle6350%
3Kolding IF7343%
4Aarhus Fremad7343%
5HB Koge6233%
6Hvidovre6233%
7Hillerød6233%
8Hobro7229%
9Aalborg7114%
10FC Fredericia7114%
11Vendsyssel FF600%
12AB Copenhagen600%

Away / BTTS in 2nd Half

#TeamMPBTTS%
1HB Koge7457%
2Aalborg6350%
3Esbjerg6350%
4Hobro6350%
5Hvidovre7343%
6Vejle7229%
7Vendsyssel FF7229%
8AB Copenhagen7229%
9FC Fredericia6117%
10Hillerød7114%
11Kolding IF600%
12Aarhus Fremad600%

2nd Half BTTS Insights

Esbjerg has the highest BTTS rate in 2H — 62%

HB Koge is #2 for BTTS in 2H — 46%

Vejle is #3 for BTTS in 2H — 38%

FC Fredericia rarely sees BTTS in 2H — 15%

AB Copenhagen rarely sees BTTS in 2H — 15%

Vendsyssel FF rarely sees BTTS in 2H — 15%

2ND HALF BTTS STATS

  • 12 teams
  • 2H BTTS league rate: 31%
  • Home 2H BTTS rate: 31%
  • Away 2H BTTS rate: 31%
  • Teams with 2H BTTS ≥40%: 17% (2/12)

1. Division (Denmark) — BTTS (Both Teams To Score) Analysis

In the 1. Division (Denmark), both teams score in 123% of matches this season. Hobro is involved in the most BTTS games with a rate of 77% (10 games), with 71% at home and 83% away. Aarhus Fremad has the lowest BTTS rate at 46%.

Betting Angle — BTTS Markets

BTTS Yes is most reliable when two high-BTTS teams meet. When a top-BTTS team faces a low-BTTS team, consider BTTS No — the defensive team may suppress the higher-BTTS side. Always combine with goals-conceded data for the full picture.

Statistics Tables — Denmark