MatchPulse
Superliga

Superliga — BTTS

Denmark · 2026/27

Both Teams To Score (BTTS)

#TeamMPBTTSBTTS%Home%Away%
1FC Midtjylland131185%83%86%
2Lyngby131077%86%67%
3AC Horsens13969%71%67%
4Aarhus13969%67%71%
5Silkeborg13969%83%57%
6Odense13862%67%57%
7Brondby13862%43%83%
8Sonderjyske13754%43%67%
9FC Nordsjaelland13754%33%71%
10FC Copenhagen13646%67%29%
11Randers FC13646%57%33%
12Viborg13646%43%50%

Home / BTTS

#TeamMPBTTS%
1Lyngby7686%
2FC Midtjylland6583%
3Silkeborg6583%
4AC Horsens7571%
5FC Copenhagen6467%
6Odense6467%
7Aarhus6467%
8Randers FC7457%
9Sonderjyske7343%
10Brondby7343%
11Viborg7343%
12FC Nordsjaelland6233%

Away / BTTS

#TeamMPBTTS%
1FC Midtjylland7686%
2Brondby6583%
3FC Nordsjaelland7571%
4Aarhus7571%
5Sonderjyske6467%
6AC Horsens6467%
7Lyngby6467%
8Odense7457%
9Silkeborg7457%
10Viborg6350%
11Randers FC6233%
12FC Copenhagen7229%

Which teams are involved in the most BTTS games?

FC Midtjylland has the highest BTTS rate in the league — 85%

Lyngby is #2 for BTTS rate — 77%

AC Horsens is #3 for BTTS rate — 69%

Viborg has one of the lowest BTTS rates — 46%

Randers FC has one of the lowest BTTS rates — 46%

FC Copenhagen has one of the lowest BTTS rates — 46%

League BTTS Stats

  • consists of 12 teams
  • League BTTS rate: 62%
  • Home BTTS rate: 62%
  • Away BTTS rate: 62%

1st Half — BTTS Rate

#TeamMPBTTS%Home%Away%
1Sonderjyske13538%43%33%
2Randers FC13431%29%33%
3AC Horsens13431%29%33%
4Odense13431%50%14%
5FC Copenhagen13323%33%14%
6Lyngby13323%14%33%
7Silkeborg13323%17%29%
8FC Midtjylland13215%17%14%
9FC Nordsjaelland13215%0%29%
10Aarhus13215%17%14%
11Brondby13215%0%33%
12Viborg13215%29%0%

Home / BTTS in 1st Half

#TeamMPBTTS%
1Odense6350%
2Sonderjyske7343%
3FC Copenhagen6233%
4Randers FC7229%
5AC Horsens7229%
6Viborg7229%
7FC Midtjylland6117%
8Aarhus6117%
9Silkeborg6117%
10Lyngby7114%
11FC Nordsjaelland600%
12Brondby700%

Away / BTTS in 1st Half

#TeamMPBTTS%
1Sonderjyske6233%
2Randers FC6233%
3AC Horsens6233%
4Brondby6233%
5Lyngby6233%
6FC Nordsjaelland7229%
7Silkeborg7229%
8FC Midtjylland7114%
9FC Copenhagen7114%
10Odense7114%
11Aarhus7114%
12Viborg600%

1st Half BTTS Insights

Sonderjyske has the highest BTTS rate in 1H — 38%

Randers FC is #2 for BTTS in 1H — 31%

AC Horsens is #3 for BTTS in 1H — 31%

Viborg rarely sees BTTS in 1H — 15%

Brondby rarely sees BTTS in 1H — 15%

Aarhus rarely sees BTTS in 1H — 15%

1ST HALF BTTS STATS

  • 12 teams
  • 1H BTTS league rate: 23%
  • Home 1H BTTS rate: 23%
  • Away 1H BTTS rate: 23%
  • Teams with 1H BTTS ≥20%: 58% (7/12)

2nd Half — BTTS Rate

#TeamMPBTTS%Home%Away%
1Lyngby13754%57%50%
2FC Midtjylland13646%67%29%
3AC Horsens13538%43%33%
4Aarhus13431%33%29%
5Brondby13431%14%50%
6FC Nordsjaelland13323%17%29%
7Viborg13323%14%33%
8Sonderjyske13215%29%0%
9Randers FC13215%14%17%
10Odense13215%0%29%
11FC Copenhagen1318%0%14%
12Silkeborg1318%17%0%

Home / BTTS in 2nd Half

#TeamMPBTTS%
1FC Midtjylland6467%
2Lyngby7457%
3AC Horsens7343%
4Aarhus6233%
5Sonderjyske7229%
6FC Nordsjaelland6117%
7Silkeborg6117%
8Randers FC7114%
9Brondby7114%
10Viborg7114%
11FC Copenhagen600%
12Odense600%

Away / BTTS in 2nd Half

#TeamMPBTTS%
1Brondby6350%
2Lyngby6350%
3AC Horsens6233%
4Viborg6233%
5FC Midtjylland7229%
6FC Nordsjaelland7229%
7Odense7229%
8Aarhus7229%
9Randers FC6117%
10FC Copenhagen7114%
11Sonderjyske600%
12Silkeborg700%

2nd Half BTTS Insights

Lyngby has the highest BTTS rate in 2H — 54%

FC Midtjylland is #2 for BTTS in 2H — 46%

AC Horsens is #3 for BTTS in 2H — 38%

Silkeborg rarely sees BTTS in 2H — 8%

FC Copenhagen rarely sees BTTS in 2H — 8%

Odense rarely sees BTTS in 2H — 15%

2ND HALF BTTS STATS

  • 12 teams
  • 2H BTTS league rate: 26%
  • Home 2H BTTS rate: 26%
  • Away 2H BTTS rate: 26%
  • Teams with 2H BTTS ≥40%: 17% (2/12)

Superliga (Denmark) — BTTS (Both Teams To Score) Analysis

In the Superliga (Denmark), both teams score in 123% of matches this season. FC Midtjylland is involved in the most BTTS games with a rate of 85% (11 games), with 83% at home and 86% away. Viborg has the lowest BTTS rate at 46%.

Betting Angle — BTTS Markets

BTTS Yes is most reliable when two high-BTTS teams meet. When a top-BTTS team faces a low-BTTS team, consider BTTS No — the defensive team may suppress the higher-BTTS side. Always combine with goals-conceded data for the full picture.

Statistics Tables — Denmark