MatchPulse
Sultan Cup

Sultan CupHome Advantage

Oman · 2025/26

Home Advantage

#TeamHome AdvantageScoredDefencePPG (Home / Away)
1Jaalan+67%+100%+33%3.00/0.00
2Oman Club+50%0%+100%2.00/1.67
3Al Seeb+32%+14%+50%3.00/1.50
4Al-Nahda+4%+29%-20%3.00/2.00
5Al Nasr0%-33%+33%1.00/2.00
6Al Wahda-8%-50%+33%1.00/3.00
7Saham-10%+14%-33%0.00/1.50
8Sur-55%-100%-9%0.00/2.00
9Sohar-67%-100%-33%0.00/1.00
10Dhofar-75%-100%-50%0.00/2.33
11Muscat-100%-100%-100%0.00/3.00

1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.

2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.

3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.

The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.

Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.

Sultan Cup (Oman) — Home Advantage Analysis

In the Sultan Cup (Oman), the average home win rate is 63% compared to 54% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Al Seeb shows the strongest home advantage, winning 100% of home games versus just 50% away (a difference of +50%). At the other end, Al Nasr actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 0% versus 67% on the road.

Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Jaalan+100%2.000.00
2Al-Nahda+29%3.001.67
3Saham+14%2.001.50
4Al Seeb+14%2.001.50
5Oman Club0%1.001.00
6Al Nasr-33%0.501.00
7Al Wahda-50%1.003.00
8Dhofar-100%0.001.33
9Muscat-100%0.002.00
10Sohar-100%0.000.50
11Sur-100%0.001.67

Sultan Cup (Oman) — Home Goals Scored Analysis

Al-Nahda has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Sultan Cup (Oman), netting 3.00 goals/match at home versus 1.67 away — a Scoring Advantage of +29%. In contrast, Al Nasr scores more away (1.00/match) than at home (0.50/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -33% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.

Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Oman Club+100%0.000.67
2Al Seeb+50%0.672.00
3Al Nasr+33%0.501.00
4Al Wahda+33%1.002.00
5Jaalan+33%1.002.00
6Sur-9%2.001.67
7Al-Nahda-20%1.000.67
8Saham-33%3.001.50
9Sohar-33%1.000.50
10Dhofar-50%1.000.33
11Muscat-100%1.000.00

Sultan Cup (Oman) — Home Defence Analysis

Oman Club has the best home defensive record in the Sultan Cup (Oman), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.67 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Al-Nahda concedes more at home (1.00/match) than away (0.67/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.

1st Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Oman Club+100%0.500.00
2Al Seeb+33%1.000.50
3Al Nasr+20%0.500.33
4Al-Nahda-33%0.501.00

Sultan Cup (Oman) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Oman Club has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Sultan Cup (Oman), netting 0.50 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Al-Nahda shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.50/match at home against 1.00 away (-33%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.

1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Al Nasr+100%0.000.33
2Oman Club+100%0.000.33
3Al Seeb+100%0.001.50
4Al-Nahda-20%0.500.33

Sultan Cup (Oman) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Al Nasr has the best home defensive record in the Sultan Cup (Oman), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.33 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Al-Nahda struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.50/match at home versus 0.33 away (-20%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.

2nd Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Al-Nahda+58%2.500.67
2Al Seeb0%1.001.00
3Oman Club-33%0.501.00
4Al Nasr-100%0.000.67

Sultan Cup (Oman) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Al-Nahda has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Sultan Cup (Oman), netting 2.50 goals/match at home versus 0.67 away — a Scoring Advantage of +58%. At the other end, Al Nasr shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.00/match at home against 0.67 away (-100%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.

2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Oman Club+100%0.000.33
2Al Nasr+14%0.500.67
3Al Seeb-14%0.670.50
4Al-Nahda-20%0.500.33

Sultan Cup (Oman) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Oman Club has the best home defensive record in the Sultan Cup (Oman), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.33 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Al-Nahda struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.50/match at home versus 0.33 away (-20%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.

Home Advantage TablesOman