Cup — Form Table
Armenia · 2026/27
Combined Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Araks Ararat | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 3.00 | |
| 2 |  Shirak | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | +6 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 7.00 | 100% | 100% | 8.00 | |
| 3 |  Andranik | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3 | +4 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 3.50 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 4 |  Pyunik Yerevan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | +4 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 6.00 | 100% | 100% | 8.00 | |
| 5 |  Alashkert | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | +4 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 6 |  Ararat-Armenia | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 7 |  FC Noah | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 7.00 | |
| 8 |  FC Urartu | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 9 |  Van | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 10 |  Lernayin Artsakh | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.50 | |
| 11 |  Mika | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 3.00 | |
| 12 |  Bentonit Ijevan | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | |
| 13 |  Sardarapat | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 14 |  Syunik | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 4.50 | |
| 15 |  Gandzasar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 16 |  Cilicia | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | |
| 17 |  Olympia Yerevan | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 18 |  Ararat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 8.00 | |
| 19 |  BKMA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 20 |  Ecoville | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 21 |  Echmiadzin | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Who Is in the Best Form in the Last 7 Games?
Shirak leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 games.
Pyunik Yerevan is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Alashkert is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Echmiadzin is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Ecoville is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
BKMA has the worst form over the last 7 games with just 0% wins and only 0.00 PPG.
- •The Cup (Armenia) Last 7 Games Form Table covers 21 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent games.
- •Win rate across the Cup in this period is 38%
- •Teams score an average of 2.46 goals per game and concede 2.46 — a combined 4.92 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 69% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 19% of games.
Cup (Armenia) Last 7 Games — Form Table Insights
Shirak, Pyunik Yerevan and Alashkert have been the standout performers in the Cup (Armenia) over the last 7 games, leading the form table with 3.00, 3.00 and 3.00 PPG respectively. Across the Cup, teams score an average of 2.46 goals and concede 2.46 per game — a combined 4.92 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 69% of fixtures while 19% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Echmiadzin and Ecoville have struggled in recent games, collecting just 0.00 and 0.00 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the Cup.
Home Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Andranik | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | +5 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 5.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 2 | Pyunik Yerevan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | +4 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 6.00 | 100% | 100% | 8.00 | |
| 3 | Alashkert | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | +4 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 4 | Araks Ararat | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | |
| 5 | FC Noah | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 7.00 | |
| 6 | FC Urartu | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 7 | Van | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 8 | Lernayin Artsakh | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.50 | |
| 9 | Mika | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 3.00 | |
| 10 | Sardarapat | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 11 | Olympia Yerevan | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms? (Last 7 Home Games)
Andranik leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 home games.
Pyunik Yerevan is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Alashkert is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Olympia Yerevan is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Sardarapat is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 0% and 1.00 PPG.
Mika has the worst form over the last 7 home games with just 0% wins and only 1.00 PPG.
- •The Cup (Armenia) Home Form Table (Last 7) covers 11 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent home games.
- •Win rate across the Cup in this period is 62%
- •Teams score an average of 3.00 goals per game and concede 1.92 — a combined 4.92 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 69% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 8% of games.
Cup (Armenia) — Home Form Table Insights (Last 7 Home Games)
Andranik, Pyunik Yerevan and Alashkert have been the standout performers in the Cup (Armenia) over the last 7 home games, leading the form table with 3.00, 3.00 and 3.00 PPG respectively. Across the Cup, teams score an average of 3.00 goals and concede 1.92 per game — a combined 4.92 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 69% of fixtures while 8% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Olympia Yerevan and Sardarapat have struggled in recent home games, collecting just 0.00 and 1.00 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the Cup.
Away Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shirak | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | +6 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 7.00 | 100% | 100% | 8.00 | |
| 2 | Ararat-Armenia | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 3 | Bentonit Ijevan | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | |
| 4 | Araks Ararat | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | |
| 5 | Syunik | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 4.50 | |
| 6 | Andranik | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 7 | Gandzasar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 8 | Cilicia | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | |
| 9 | Ararat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 8.00 | |
| 10 | BKMA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 11 | Ecoville | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 12 | Echmiadzin | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms? (Last 7 Away Games)
Shirak leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 away games.
Ararat-Armenia is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Bentonit Ijevan is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 0% and 1.00 PPG.
Echmiadzin is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Ecoville is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
BKMA has the worst form over the last 7 away games with just 0% wins and only 0.00 PPG.
- •The Cup (Armenia) Away Form Table (Last 7) covers 12 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent away games.
- •Win rate across the Cup in this period is 15%
- •Teams score an average of 1.92 goals per game and concede 3.00 — a combined 4.92 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 69% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 31% of games.
Cup (Armenia) — Away Form Table Insights (Last 7 Away Games)
Shirak, Ararat-Armenia and Bentonit Ijevan have been the standout performers in the Cup (Armenia) over the last 7 away games, leading the form table with 3.00, 3.00 and 1.00 PPG respectively. Across the Cup, teams score an average of 1.92 goals and concede 3.00 per game — a combined 4.92 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 69% of fixtures while 31% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Echmiadzin and Ecoville have struggled in recent away games, collecting just 0.00 and 0.00 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the Cup.
Form Tables — Armenia
- First League Form Table— Division Underground
- Premier League Form Table— Division Silver
- Super Cup Form Table— Division Silver