Cup — Form Table
Latvia · 2026
Combined Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 5 | +10 | 9 | WWWL | 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 3.75 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | ||
| 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 5 | +5 | 9 | WWW | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.33 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | ||
| 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 3 | +12 | 7 | WWD | 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 5.00 | 67% | 67% | 6.00 | ||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 4 | +2 | 7 | WWD | 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 2.00 | 67% | 67% | 3.33 | ||
| 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | +6 | 6 | WWL | 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 3.33 | 100% | 100% | 4.67 | ||
| 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 7 | +3 | 6 | WWL | 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.33 | 100% | 100% | 5.67 | ||
| 7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | +3 | 6 | WWL | 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 2.67 | 100% | 67% | 4.33 | ||
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | +2 | 6 | WWL | 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 2.00 | 67% | 67% | 3.33 | ||
| 9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 6 | WWL | 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 2.67 | ||
| 10 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 5 | DWD | 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.67 | 100% | 100% | 4.67 | ||
| 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | +4 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 2.50 | 50% | 50% | 3.00 | ||
| 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.50 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | ||
| 13 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 2.50 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | ||
| 14 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 5 | +1 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.50 | ||
| 15 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.50 | ||
| 16 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.50 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | ||
| 17 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 3.00 | ||
| 18 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | ||
| 19 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | ||
| 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | ||
| 21 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | ||
| 22 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | ||
| 23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | ||
| 24 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 8.00 | ||
| 25 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | ||
| 26 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | ||
| 27 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | ||
| 28 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | ||
| 29 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | ||
| 30 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | ||
| 31 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | ||
| 32 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | ||
| 33 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | ||
| 34 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 11 | -11 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 11.00 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Who Is in the Best Form in the Last 7 Games?
Riga leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 games.
Riga Mariners is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 67% and 2.33 PPG.
Auda is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 67% and 2.33 PPG.
RFK/RFS is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Union / Daugava is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Lielupe has the worst form over the last 7 games with just 0% wins and only 0.00 PPG.
- •The Cup (Latvia) Last 7 Games Form Table covers 34 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent games.
- •Win rate across the Cup in this period is 47%
- •Teams score an average of 2.19 goals per game and concede 2.19 — a combined 4.38 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 59% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 20% of games.
Cup (Latvia) Last 7 Games — Form Table Insights
Riga, Riga Mariners and Auda have been the standout performers in the Cup (Latvia) over the last 7 games, leading the form table with 3.00, 2.33 and 2.33 PPG respectively. Across the Cup, teams score an average of 2.19 goals and concede 2.19 per game — a combined 4.38 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 59% of fixtures while 20% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, RFK/RFS and Union / Daugava have struggled in recent games, collecting just 0.00 and 0.00 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the Cup.
Home Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | +7 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.50 | ||
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 3.00 | ||
| 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.50 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | ||
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 3.50 | ||
| 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | +6 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 6.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | ||
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | ||
| 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 3.50 | ||
| 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 3.50 | ||
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | ||
| 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 4.00 | ||
| 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | ||
| 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | ||
| 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | ||
| 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | ||
| 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 8.00 | ||
| 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | ||
| 17 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | ||
| 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | ||
| 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | ||
| 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | ||
| 21 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | ||
| 22 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | ||
| 23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | ||
| 24 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | ||
| 25 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 11 | -11 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 11.00 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms? (Last 7 Home Games)
Metta / LU leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 home games.
Auda is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Spēks is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
RFK/RFS is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Lielupe is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Iecava has the worst form over the last 7 home games with just 0% wins and only 0.00 PPG.
- •The Cup (Latvia) Home Form Table (Last 7) covers 25 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent home games.
- •Win rate across the Cup in this period is 38%
- •Teams score an average of 1.78 goals per game and concede 2.59 — a combined 4.38 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 59% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 22% of games.
Cup (Latvia) — Home Form Table Insights (Last 7 Home Games)
Metta / LU, Auda and Spēks have been the standout performers in the Cup (Latvia) over the last 7 home games, leading the form table with 3.00, 3.00 and 3.00 PPG respectively. Across the Cup, teams score an average of 1.78 goals and concede 2.59 per game — a combined 4.38 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 59% of fixtures while 22% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, RFK/RFS and Lielupe have struggled in recent home games, collecting just 0.00 and 0.00 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the Cup.
Away Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4 | +4 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | ||
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | +2 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | ||
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | +11 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 11.00 | 100% | 100% | 11.00 | ||
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | +4 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 2.50 | 50% | 50% | 3.00 | ||
| 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | +4 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 5.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | ||
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | +4 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | ||
| 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 3.50 | 100% | 100% | 5.50 | ||
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | ||
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | +3 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | ||
| 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.50 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | ||
| 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | ||
| 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | ||
| 13 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | ||
| 14 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.50 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | ||
| 15 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | ||
| 16 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 3.00 | ||
| 17 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | ||
| 18 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | ||
| 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | ||
| 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | ||
| 21 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | ||
| 22 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | ||
| 23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | ||
| 24 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms? (Last 7 Away Games)
Leevon / PPK leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 away games.
Riga is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Riga Mariners is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Union / Daugava is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Ķekava / Auda is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Skanste has the worst form over the last 7 away games with just 0% wins and only 0.00 PPG.
- •The Cup (Latvia) Away Form Table (Last 7) covers 24 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent away games.
- •Win rate across the Cup in this period is 56%
- •Teams score an average of 2.59 goals per game and concede 1.78 — a combined 4.38 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 59% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 19% of games.
Cup (Latvia) — Away Form Table Insights (Last 7 Away Games)
Leevon / PPK, Riga and Riga Mariners have been the standout performers in the Cup (Latvia) over the last 7 away games, leading the form table with 3.00, 3.00 and 3.00 PPG respectively. Across the Cup, teams score an average of 2.59 goals and concede 1.78 per game — a combined 4.38 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 59% of fixtures while 19% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Union / Daugava and Ķekava / Auda have struggled in recent away games, collecting just 0.00 and 0.00 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the Cup.
Form Tables — Latvia
- 1. Liga Form Table— Division Underground
- Super Cup Form Table— Division Silver
- Virsliga Form Table— Division Silver