Cup — Under 0.5 ~ 5.5 Tables
Estonia · 2026/27
Under 2.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 2.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 3 | 4 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 6 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 7 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 8 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 9 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 10 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 100% | |
| 11 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 100% | |
| 12 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 13 | 4 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 14 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 15 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 16 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 17 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 18 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 19 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 20 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 25 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 27 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 29 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 30 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 32 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 33 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 34 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 35 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 36 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 37 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 38 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 39 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 40 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 51 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 52 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 53 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 54 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 55 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 56 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 57 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 58 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 59 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 65 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 66 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 67 | 4 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 68 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 69 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 70 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 2.5 Insights
League average
10%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 2.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Trans Narva lead the Cup with a 50% Under 2.5 rate — 2 of their 4 completed fixtures have stayed within the 2.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 50% and away 0%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 8%, putting Trans Narva ahead of the rest.
Nõmme United and Tammeka rank second and third respectively. Nõmme United recorded a 33% rate across 3 matches (1 stayed below), while Tammeka stand at 33% from 3 outings (1 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 2.5 fixtures in the Cup this term.
At the other end, Viimsi record the lowest Under 2.5 rate in the Cup at 0% — only 0 of their 4 fixtures have stayed under 2.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 2.5 Betting Angle — Cup
With a league-wide Under 2.5 rate of 8%, the Cup is not predominantly defensive in character. The top three clubs average 39%, sitting 31 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Trans Narva's fixtures have gone Under 2.5 in 50% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 0.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 0.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 2 | 4 | 1 | 25% | 25% | 0% | |
| 3 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 4 | 4 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 5 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 6 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 7 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 8 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 9 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 10 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 11 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 12 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 13 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 14 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 15 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 16 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 17 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 18 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 19 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 20 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 25 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 27 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 29 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 30 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 32 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 33 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 34 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 35 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 36 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 37 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 38 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 39 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 40 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 51 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 52 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 53 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 54 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 55 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 56 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 57 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 58 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 59 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 65 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 66 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 67 | 4 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 68 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 69 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 70 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 0.5 Insights
League average
2%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 0.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Trans Narva lead the Cup with a 25% Under 0.5 rate — 1 of their 4 completed fixtures have stayed within the 0.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 25% and away 0%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 2%, putting Trans Narva ahead of the rest.
Elva and FC Tallinn rank second and third respectively. Elva recorded a 0% rate across 4 matches (0 stayed below), while FC Tallinn stand at 0% from 3 outings (0 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 0.5 fixtures in the Cup this term.
At the other end, Viimsi record the lowest Under 0.5 rate in the Cup at 0% — only 0 of their 4 fixtures have stayed under 0.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 0.5 Betting Angle — Cup
With a league-wide Under 0.5 rate of 2%, the Cup is not predominantly defensive in character. The top three clubs average 8%, sitting 6 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Trans Narva's fixtures have gone Under 0.5 in 25% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 1.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 1.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 5 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 100% | |
| 6 | 4 | 1 | 25% | 25% | 0% | |
| 7 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 8 | 4 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 9 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 10 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 11 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 12 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 13 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 14 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 15 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 16 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 17 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 18 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 19 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 20 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 25 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 27 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 29 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 30 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 32 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 33 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 34 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 35 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 36 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 37 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 38 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 39 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 40 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 51 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 52 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 53 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 54 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 55 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 56 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 57 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 58 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 59 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 65 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 66 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 67 | 4 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 68 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 69 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 70 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 1.5 Insights
League average
5%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 1.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Tammeka lead the Cup with a 33% Under 1.5 rate — 1 of their 3 completed fixtures have stayed within the 1.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 0% and away 100%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 4%, putting Tammeka ahead of the rest.
Trans Narva and Elva rank second and third respectively. Trans Narva recorded a 25% rate across 4 matches (1 stayed below), while Elva stand at 0% from 4 outings (0 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 1.5 fixtures in the Cup this term.
At the other end, Viimsi record the lowest Under 1.5 rate in the Cup at 0% — only 0 of their 4 fixtures have stayed under 1.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 1.5 Betting Angle — Cup
With a league-wide Under 1.5 rate of 4%, the Cup is not predominantly defensive in character. The top three clubs average 19%, sitting 15 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Tammeka's fixtures have gone Under 1.5 in 33% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 3.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 3.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 7 | 4 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 8 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 9 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 10 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 11 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 12 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 13 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 14 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 15 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 16 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 100% | |
| 17 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 100% | 0% | |
| 18 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 50% | |
| 19 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 100% | |
| 20 | 4 | 1 | 25% | 50% | 0% | |
| 21 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 25 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 27 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 29 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 30 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 32 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 33 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 34 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 35 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 36 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 37 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 38 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 39 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 40 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 51 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 52 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 53 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 54 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 55 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 56 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 57 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 58 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 59 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 65 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 66 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 67 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 68 | 4 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 69 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 70 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 3.5 Insights
League average
18%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 3.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Trans Narva lead the Cup with a 50% Under 3.5 rate — 2 of their 4 completed fixtures have stayed within the 3.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 50% and away 0%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 14%, putting Trans Narva ahead of the rest.
Nõmme United and Saku Sporting rank second and third respectively. Nõmme United recorded a 33% rate across 3 matches (1 stayed below), while Saku Sporting stand at 33% from 3 outings (1 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 3.5 fixtures in the Cup this term.
At the other end, Viimsi record the lowest Under 3.5 rate in the Cup at 0% — only 0 of their 4 fixtures have stayed under 3.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 3.5 Betting Angle — Cup
With a league-wide Under 3.5 rate of 14%, the Cup is not predominantly defensive in character. The top three clubs average 39%, sitting 25 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Trans Narva's fixtures have gone Under 3.5 in 50% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 4.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 4.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 10 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 11 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 12 | 4 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| 13 | 4 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 14 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 15 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 16 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 17 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 18 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 19 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 20 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 21 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 22 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 23 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 24 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 25 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 26 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 100% | 0% | |
| 27 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 28 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 100% | |
| 29 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 100% | 0% | |
| 30 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 50% | |
| 31 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 100% | |
| 32 | 4 | 1 | 25% | 100% | 0% | |
| 33 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 34 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 35 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 36 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 37 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 38 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 39 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 40 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 51 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 52 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 53 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 54 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 55 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 56 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 57 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 58 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 59 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 65 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 66 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 67 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 68 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 69 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 70 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 4.5 Insights
League average
29%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 4.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Elva lead the Cup with a 50% Under 4.5 rate — 2 of their 4 completed fixtures have stayed within the 4.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 50% and away 50%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 22%, putting Elva ahead of the rest.
Trans Narva and Keila rank second and third respectively. Trans Narva recorded a 50% rate across 4 matches (2 stayed below), while Keila stand at 33% from 3 outings (1 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 4.5 fixtures in the Cup this term.
At the other end, Vaprus record the lowest Under 4.5 rate in the Cup at 0% — only 0 of their 3 fixtures have stayed under 4.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 4.5 Betting Angle — Cup
With a league-wide Under 4.5 rate of 22%, the Cup is not predominantly defensive in character. The top three clubs average 44%, sitting 22 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Elva's fixtures have gone Under 4.5 in 50% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 5.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 5.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 3 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 7 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 8 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 10 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 11 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 13 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 14 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 15 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 16 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 17 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 18 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 19 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 20 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 21 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 22 | 4 | 3 | 75% | 100% | 50% | |
| 23 | 4 | 3 | 75% | 100% | 67% | |
| 24 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 67% | 0% | |
| 25 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 50% | 100% | |
| 26 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 50% | 100% | |
| 27 | 4 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 28 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 29 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 30 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 31 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 32 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 33 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 34 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 35 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 36 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 100% | 0% | |
| 37 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 38 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 33% | 0% | |
| 39 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 100% | 0% | |
| 40 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 50% | |
| 41 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 50% | |
| 42 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 51 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 52 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 53 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 54 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 55 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 56 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 57 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 58 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 59 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 65 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 66 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 67 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 68 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 69 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 70 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 5.5 Insights
League average
47%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 5.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Vaprus lead the Cup with a 100% Under 5.5 rate — 3 of their 3 completed fixtures have stayed within the 5.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 0% and away 100%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 45%, putting Vaprus ahead of the rest.
Elva and Viimsi rank second and third respectively. Elva recorded a 75% rate across 4 matches (3 stayed below), while Viimsi stand at 75% from 4 outings (3 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 5.5 fixtures in the Cup this term.
At the other end, Tartu Kalev record the lowest Under 5.5 rate in the Cup at 0% — only 0 of their 3 fixtures have stayed under 5.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 5.5 Betting Angle — Cup
With a league-wide Under 5.5 rate of 45%, the Cup shows a moderate lean toward compact scoreboards. The top three clubs average 83%, sitting 38 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Vaprus's fixtures have gone Under 5.5 in 100% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.