Ligue 1 — Home Advantage
Burkina-Faso · 2026/27
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +38% | +100% | -25% | 1.00/0.25 | |
| 2 | +17% | 0% | +33% | 1.75/1.33 | |
| 3 | +14% | -71% | +100% | 1.67/2.50 | |
| 4 | +12% | +58% | -35% | 0.25/1.00 | |
| 5 | +9% | -33% | +51% | 1.00/0.33 | |
| 6 | +3% | -14% | +20% | 2.00/1.75 | |
| 7 | 0% | +50% | -50% | 0.25/1.00 | |
| 8 | -4% | +6% | -14% | 1.00/2.00 | |
| 9 | -13% | -54% | +28% | 0.75/1.00 | |
| 10 | -13% | -7% | -20% | 2.25/2.33 | |
| 11 | -19% | -36% | -2% | 1.50/3.00 | |
| 12 | -24% | -68% | +20% | 1.00/1.75 | |
| 13 | -26% | -38% | -14% | 0.67/2.25 | |
| 14 | -37% | +25% | -100% | 2.00/2.50 | |
| 15 | -44% | -27% | -60% | 1.33/1.75 | |
| 16 | -49% | -38% | -60% | 0.00/1.75 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
Ligue 1 (Burkina-Faso) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the Ligue 1 (Burkina-Faso), the average home win rate is 32% compared to 49% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Comoé shows the strongest home advantage, winning 33% of home games versus just 0% away (a difference of +33%). At the other end, Réal du Faso actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 0% versus 75% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | +58% | 1.25 | 0.33 | |
| 3 | +50% | 1.00 | 0.33 | |
| 4 | +25% | 1.67 | 1.00 | |
| 5 | +6% | 1.50 | 1.33 | |
| 6 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 7 | -7% | 1.75 | 2.00 | |
| 8 | -14% | 1.33 | 1.75 | |
| 9 | -27% | 1.00 | 1.75 | |
| 10 | -33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 11 | -36% | 1.25 | 2.67 | |
| 12 | -38% | 0.33 | 0.75 | |
| 13 | -38% | 0.67 | 1.50 | |
| 14 | -54% | 0.50 | 1.67 | |
| 15 | -68% | 0.33 | 1.75 | |
| 16 | -71% | 0.33 | 2.00 |
Ligue 1 (Burkina-Faso) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
Comoé has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Ligue 1 (Burkina-Faso), netting 1.00 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. In contrast, Vitesse scores more away (2.00/match) than at home (0.33/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -71% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.75 | |
| 2 | +51% | 0.75 | 2.33 | |
| 3 | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 4 | +28% | 0.75 | 1.33 | |
| 5 | +20% | 0.67 | 1.00 | |
| 6 | +20% | 1.00 | 1.50 | |
| 7 | -2% | 1.75 | 1.67 | |
| 8 | -14% | 1.75 | 1.33 | |
| 9 | -14% | 1.00 | 0.75 | |
| 10 | -20% | 1.00 | 0.67 | |
| 11 | -25% | 1.67 | 1.00 | |
| 12 | -35% | 2.75 | 1.33 | |
| 13 | -50% | 3.00 | 1.00 | |
| 14 | -60% | 2.00 | 0.50 | |
| 15 | -60% | 1.00 | 0.25 | |
| 16 | -100% | 0.67 | 0.00 |
Ligue 1 (Burkina-Faso) — Home Defence Analysis
Vitesse has the best home defensive record in the Ligue 1 (Burkina-Faso), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.75 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, USFA concedes more at home (0.67/match) than away (0.00/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.67 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | +100% | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 3 | +45% | 1.33 | 0.50 | |
| 4 | +38% | 0.75 | 0.33 | |
| 5 | +20% | 0.50 | 0.33 | |
| 6 | +14% | 0.67 | 0.50 | |
| 7 | +11% | 1.25 | 1.00 | |
| 8 | -14% | 1.00 | 1.33 | |
| 9 | -38% | 0.33 | 0.75 | |
| 10 | -60% | 0.25 | 1.00 | |
| 11 | -60% | 0.25 | 1.00 | |
| 12 | -100% | 0.00 | 0.33 | |
| 13 | -100% | 0.00 | 0.75 | |
| 14 | -100% | 0.00 | 0.25 | |
| 15 | -100% | 0.00 | 0.75 | |
| 16 | -100% | 0.00 | 0.75 |
Ligue 1 (Burkina-Faso) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Comoé has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Ligue 1 (Burkina-Faso), netting 0.67 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, CFFEB shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.00/match at home against 0.75 away (-100%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.25 | |
| 2 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.25 | |
| 3 | +100% | 0.00 | 2.00 | |
| 4 | +14% | 0.25 | 0.33 | |
| 5 | +14% | 0.25 | 0.33 | |
| 6 | +14% | 1.00 | 1.33 | |
| 7 | +6% | 0.67 | 0.75 | |
| 8 | -6% | 0.75 | 0.67 | |
| 9 | -14% | 0.33 | 0.25 | |
| 10 | -14% | 0.67 | 0.50 | |
| 11 | -30% | 1.25 | 0.67 | |
| 12 | -45% | 0.67 | 0.25 | |
| 13 | -50% | 1.00 | 0.33 | |
| 14 | -60% | 1.00 | 0.25 | |
| 15 | -100% | 0.75 | 0.00 | |
| 16 | -100% | 0.67 | 0.00 |
Ligue 1 (Burkina-Faso) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Douanes has the best home defensive record in the Ligue 1 (Burkina-Faso), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.25 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. USFA struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.67/match at home versus 0.00 away (-100%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 1.25 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | +100% | 0.25 | 0.00 | |
| 3 | +100% | 0.75 | 0.00 | |
| 4 | +100% | 0.33 | 0.00 | |
| 5 | +6% | 0.75 | 0.67 | |
| 6 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 7 | -14% | 0.25 | 0.33 | |
| 8 | -20% | 0.33 | 0.50 | |
| 9 | -20% | 0.33 | 0.50 | |
| 10 | -25% | 1.00 | 1.67 | |
| 11 | -30% | 0.67 | 1.25 | |
| 12 | -38% | 0.33 | 0.75 | |
| 13 | -50% | 0.33 | 1.00 | |
| 14 | -58% | 0.33 | 1.25 | |
| 15 | -100% | 0.00 | 1.33 | |
| 16 | -100% | 0.00 | 1.00 |
Ligue 1 (Burkina-Faso) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Salitas has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Ligue 1 (Burkina-Faso), netting 1.25 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Maya shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.00/match at home against 1.00 away (-100%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 2 | +45% | 0.25 | 0.67 | |
| 3 | +45% | 0.25 | 0.67 | |
| 4 | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 5 | +30% | 0.67 | 1.25 | |
| 6 | +6% | 0.67 | 0.75 | |
| 7 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 8 | -14% | 0.33 | 0.25 | |
| 9 | -20% | 1.00 | 0.67 | |
| 10 | -38% | 1.50 | 0.67 | |
| 11 | -38% | 0.75 | 0.33 | |
| 12 | -38% | 0.75 | 0.33 | |
| 13 | -50% | 2.00 | 0.67 | |
| 14 | -60% | 1.00 | 0.25 | |
| 15 | -60% | 1.00 | 0.25 | |
| 16 | -100% | 0.33 | 0.00 |
Ligue 1 (Burkina-Faso) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Vitesse has the best home defensive record in the Ligue 1 (Burkina-Faso), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.50 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. CFFEB struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.33/match at home versus 0.00 away (-100%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.