Toto Cup Ligat Al — Home Advantage
Israel · 2026/27
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Hapoel Katamon | +37% | +20% | +54% | 3.00/1.33 |
| 2 |  Maccabi Haifa | +23% | +60% | -14% | 1.00/1.50 |
| 3 |  Bnei Sakhnin | +17% | +14% | +20% | 1.00/0.00 |
| 4 |  Hapoel Petah Tikva | +10% | -14% | +33% | 1.50/0.00 |
| 5 |  Hapoel Haifa | +5% | +3% | +6% | 2.00/3.00 |
| 6 |  Hapoel Ramat Gan | +4% | +8% | 0% | 1.67/1.50 |
| 7 |  Beitar Jerusalem | 0% | -20% | +20% | 1.00/1.00 |
| 8 |  Ironi Tiberias | -1% | -38% | +35% | 1.00/0.00 |
| 9 |  Maccabi Petah Tikva | -9% | +20% | -38% | 1.50/1.00 |
| 10 |  Ironi Kiryat Shmona | -12% | -9% | -14% | 2.00/3.00 |
| 11 |  Maccabi Netanya | -31% | -9% | -54% | 1.00/3.00 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
Toto Cup Ligat Al (Israel) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the Toto Cup Ligat Al (Israel), the average home win rate is 50% compared to 47% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Hapoel Katamon shows the strongest home advantage, winning 100% of home games versus just 33% away (a difference of +67%). At the other end, Maccabi Netanya actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 33% versus 100% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maccabi Haifa | +60% | 2.00 | 0.50 |
| 2 | Hapoel Katamon | +20% | 2.00 | 1.33 |
| 3 | Maccabi Petah Tikva | +20% | 1.50 | 1.00 |
| 4 | Bnei Sakhnin | +14% | 0.67 | 0.50 |
| 5 | Hapoel Ramat Gan | +8% | 2.33 | 2.00 |
| 6 | Hapoel Haifa | +3% | 2.67 | 2.50 |
| 7 | Maccabi Netanya | -9% | 1.67 | 2.00 |
| 8 | Ironi Kiryat Shmona | -9% | 1.67 | 2.00 |
| 9 | Hapoel Petah Tikva | -14% | 0.50 | 0.67 |
| 10 | Beitar Jerusalem | -20% | 2.00 | 3.00 |
| 11 | Ironi Tiberias | -38% | 0.67 | 1.50 |
Toto Cup Ligat Al (Israel) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
Maccabi Haifa has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Toto Cup Ligat Al (Israel), netting 2.00 goals/match at home versus 0.50 away — a Scoring Advantage of +60%. In contrast, Ironi Tiberias scores more away (1.50/match) than at home (0.67/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -38% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hapoel Katamon | +54% | 0.50 | 1.67 |
| 2 | Ironi Tiberias | +35% | 1.67 | 3.50 |
| 3 | Hapoel Petah Tikva | +33% | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| 4 | Beitar Jerusalem | +20% | 2.00 | 3.00 |
| 5 | Bnei Sakhnin | +20% | 1.00 | 1.50 |
| 6 | Hapoel Haifa | +6% | 1.33 | 1.50 |
| 7 | Hapoel Ramat Gan | 0% | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| 8 | Maccabi Haifa | -14% | 2.00 | 1.50 |
| 9 | Ironi Kiryat Shmona | -14% | 0.67 | 0.50 |
| 10 | Maccabi Petah Tikva | -38% | 1.50 | 0.67 |
| 11 | Maccabi Netanya | -54% | 1.67 | 0.50 |
Toto Cup Ligat Al (Israel) — Home Defence Analysis
Hapoel Katamon has the best home defensive record in the Toto Cup Ligat Al (Israel), conceding just 0.50 goals/match at home compared to 1.67 away — a Defence Advantage of +54%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Maccabi Netanya concedes more at home (1.67/match) than away (0.50/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maccabi Haifa | +100% | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| 2 | Maccabi Petah Tikva | +100% | 0.50 | 0.00 |
| 3 | Ironi Kiryat Shmona | +100% | 1.33 | 0.00 |
| 4 | Hapoel Ramat Gan | +14% | 0.67 | 0.50 |
| 5 | Hapoel Haifa | +5% | 1.67 | 1.50 |
| 6 | Maccabi Netanya | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 7 | Bnei Sakhnin | -100% | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| 8 | Hapoel Katamon | -100% | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| 9 | Hapoel Petah Tikva | -100% | 0.00 | 0.33 |
| 10 | Ironi Tiberias | -100% | 0.00 | 1.00 |
Toto Cup Ligat Al (Israel) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Maccabi Haifa has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Toto Cup Ligat Al (Israel), netting 1.00 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Ironi Tiberias shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.00/match at home against 1.00 away (-100%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hapoel Katamon | +100% | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 2 | Ironi Kiryat Shmona | +100% | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| 3 | Ironi Tiberias | +76% | 0.33 | 2.50 |
| 4 | Maccabi Haifa | +20% | 1.00 | 1.50 |
| 5 | Maccabi Netanya | -33% | 1.00 | 0.50 |
| 6 | Hapoel Ramat Gan | -45% | 1.33 | 0.50 |
| 7 | Hapoel Haifa | -100% | 0.33 | 0.00 |
| 8 | Bnei Sakhnin | -100% | 0.33 | 0.00 |
| 9 | Hapoel Petah Tikva | -100% | 0.50 | 0.00 |
| 10 | Maccabi Petah Tikva | -100% | 0.50 | 0.00 |
Toto Cup Ligat Al (Israel) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Hapoel Katamon has the best home defensive record in the Toto Cup Ligat Al (Israel), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 1.00 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Maccabi Petah Tikva struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.50/match at home versus 0.00 away (-100%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bnei Sakhnin | +100% | 0.67 | 0.00 |
| 2 | Hapoel Katamon | +50% | 2.00 | 0.67 |
| 3 | Maccabi Haifa | +33% | 1.00 | 0.50 |
| 4 | Hapoel Petah Tikva | +20% | 0.50 | 0.33 |
| 5 | Ironi Tiberias | +14% | 0.67 | 0.50 |
| 6 | Hapoel Ramat Gan | +5% | 1.67 | 1.50 |
| 7 | Hapoel Haifa | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 8 | Maccabi Petah Tikva | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 9 | Maccabi Netanya | -20% | 0.67 | 1.00 |
| 10 | Ironi Kiryat Shmona | -71% | 0.33 | 2.00 |
Toto Cup Ligat Al (Israel) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Bnei Sakhnin has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Toto Cup Ligat Al (Israel), netting 0.67 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Ironi Kiryat Shmona shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.33/match at home against 2.00 away (-71%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hapoel Petah Tikva | +60% | 0.50 | 2.00 |
| 2 | Bnei Sakhnin | +38% | 0.67 | 1.50 |
| 3 | Hapoel Ramat Gan | +38% | 0.67 | 1.50 |
| 4 | Hapoel Haifa | +20% | 1.00 | 1.50 |
| 5 | Hapoel Katamon | +14% | 0.50 | 0.67 |
| 6 | Ironi Tiberias | -14% | 1.33 | 1.00 |
| 7 | Maccabi Petah Tikva | -20% | 1.00 | 0.67 |
| 8 | Maccabi Haifa | -100% | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | Maccabi Netanya | -100% | 0.67 | 0.00 |
| 10 | Ironi Kiryat Shmona | -100% | 0.67 | 0.00 |
Toto Cup Ligat Al (Israel) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Hapoel Petah Tikva has the best home defensive record in the Toto Cup Ligat Al (Israel), conceding just 0.50 goals/match at home compared to 2.00 away — a Defence Advantage of +60%. Ironi Kiryat Shmona struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.67/match at home versus 0.00 away (-100%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Israel
- Liga Alef Home Advantage— Division Pro
- Liga Leumit Home Advantage— Division Silver
- Ligat Ha'al Home Advantage— Division Gold
- State Cup Home Advantage— Division SemiPro
- Super Cup Home Advantage— Division SemiPro