FA Cup — Home Advantage
Thailand · 2025/26
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | +100% | +100% | 3.00/0.00 | |
| 2 | +100% | +100% | +100% | 3.00/0.00 | |
| 3 | +100% | +100% | +100% | 3.00/0.00 | |
| 4 | +100% | +100% | +100% | 3.00/0.00 | |
| 5 | +80% | +100% | +60% | 3.00/0.00 | |
| 6 | +80% | +60% | +100% | 3.00/1.50 | |
| 7 | +71% | +82% | +60% | 3.00/0.00 | |
| 8 | +67% | +33% | +100% | 2.00/0.00 | |
| 9 | +57% | +15% | +100% | 3.00/3.00 | |
| 10 | +56% | +52% | +60% | 1.50/3.00 | |
| 11 | +50% | 0% | +100% | 3.00/1.50 | |
| 12 | +43% | -14% | +100% | 3.00/2.00 | |
| 13 | +33% | -33% | +100% | 3.00/0.00 | |
| 14 | +27% | -45% | +100% | 3.00/3.00 | |
| 15 | +12% | +9% | +14% | 3.00/2.00 | |
| 16 | -17% | -33% | 0% | 3.00/3.00 | |
| 17 | -50% | 0% | -100% | 0.00/3.00 | |
| 18 | -75% | -50% | -100% | 1.50/3.00 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
FA Cup (Thailand) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the FA Cup (Thailand), the average home win rate is 88% compared to 67% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Bangkok United shows the strongest home advantage, winning 100% of home games versus just 0% away (a difference of +100%). At the other end, Chiangrai United actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 50% versus 100% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 7.00 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | +100% | 3.00 | 0.00 | |
| 3 | +100% | 2.75 | 0.00 | |
| 4 | +100% | 2.00 | 0.00 | |
| 5 | +100% | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 6 | +82% | 5.00 | 0.50 | |
| 7 | +60% | 2.00 | 0.50 | |
| 8 | +52% | 9.50 | 3.00 | |
| 9 | +33% | 2.00 | 1.00 | |
| 10 | +15% | 6.75 | 5.00 | |
| 11 | +9% | 2.00 | 1.67 | |
| 12 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 13 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 14 | -14% | 2.00 | 2.67 | |
| 15 | -33% | 2.00 | 4.00 | |
| 16 | -33% | 1.00 | 2.00 | |
| 17 | -45% | 1.00 | 2.67 | |
| 18 | -50% | 1.00 | 3.00 |
FA Cup (Thailand) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
Bangkok United has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the FA Cup (Thailand), netting 5.00 goals/match at home versus 0.50 away — a Scoring Advantage of +82%. In contrast, Prachuap scores more away (2.67/match) than at home (1.00/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -45% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| 2 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| 3 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.67 | |
| 4 | +100% | 0.00 | 5.00 | |
| 5 | +100% | 0.00 | 2.00 | |
| 6 | +100% | 0.00 | 6.00 | |
| 7 | +100% | 0.00 | 3.00 | |
| 8 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.50 | |
| 9 | +100% | 0.00 | 2.33 | |
| 10 | +100% | 0.00 | 3.00 | |
| 11 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| 12 | +60% | 0.50 | 2.00 | |
| 13 | +60% | 0.50 | 2.00 | |
| 14 | +60% | 0.50 | 2.00 | |
| 15 | +14% | 0.50 | 0.67 | |
| 16 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 17 | -100% | 2.00 | 0.00 | |
| 18 | -100% | 1.50 | 0.00 |
FA Cup (Thailand) — Home Defence Analysis
Prachuap has the best home defensive record in the FA Cup (Thailand), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.67 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Lamphun Warrior concedes more at home (0.50/match) than away (0.67/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +71% | 3.00 | 0.50 | |
| 2 | +33% | 3.00 | 1.50 | |
| 3 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 4 | -100% | 0.00 | 1.00 |
FA Cup (Thailand) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Bangkok United has the biggest home scoring advantage in the FA Cup (Thailand), netting 3.00 goals/match at home versus 0.50 away — a Scoring Advantage of +71%. At the other end, Prachuap shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.00/match at home against 1.00 away (-100%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.50 | |
| 2 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 3 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 4 | -20% | 0.50 | 0.33 |
FA Cup (Thailand) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Bangkok United has the best home defensive record in the FA Cup (Thailand), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 1.50 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Lamphun Warrior struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.50/match at home versus 0.33 away (-20%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 2.00 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | +63% | 6.50 | 1.50 | |
| 3 | +20% | 1.00 | 0.67 | |
| 4 | -25% | 1.00 | 1.67 |
FA Cup (Thailand) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Bangkok United has the biggest home scoring advantage in the FA Cup (Thailand), netting 2.00 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Prachuap shows the weakest home output in this period, with 1.00/match at home against 1.67 away (-25%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.50 | |
| 2 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.67 | |
| 3 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.33 | |
| 4 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 |
FA Cup (Thailand) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Chiangrai United has the best home defensive record in the FA Cup (Thailand), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 1.50 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Bangkok United struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.50/match at home versus 0.50 away (0%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Thailand
- League Cup Home Advantage— Division Pro
- Thai Champions Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Thai League 1 Home Advantage— Division Pro
- Thai League 2 Home Advantage— Division Pro