Youth Championship — Form Table
Russia · 2026/27
Combined Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 8 | +23 | 21 | WWWWWWW | 3.00 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 4.43 | 100% | 86% | 5.57 | ||
| 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 24 | 8 | +16 | 19 | WWWWWWD | 2.71 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 3.43 | 100% | 100% | 4.57 | ||
| 3 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 15 | +4 | 18 | WWWWLWW | 2.57 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 2.71 | 100% | 100% | 4.86 | ||
| 4 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 21 | 14 | +7 | 15 | WLWWWLW | 2.14 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | ||
| 5 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 16 | 9 | +7 | 12 | DWWLWDD | 1.71 | 57% | 29% | 43% | 2.29 | 71% | 71% | 3.57 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 8 | +5 | 12 | WWWLWLL | 1.71 | 43% | 29% | 29% | 1.86 | 86% | 57% | 3.00 | ||
| 7 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 10 | WLWWLDL | 1.43 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 1.57 | 71% | 71% | 3.43 | ||
| 8 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 9 | LWLWLLW | 1.29 | 43% | 43% | 14% | 1.57 | 57% | 57% | 3.57 | ||
| 9 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 16 | 22 | -6 | 9 | LWLLWLW | 1.29 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 2.29 | 86% | 86% | 5.43 | ||
| 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 7 | LLLWLWD | 1.00 | 29% | 43% | 43% | 0.86 | 71% | 57% | 3.14 | ||
| 11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 6 | DDLLLDW | 0.86 | 43% | 43% | 43% | 1.00 | 43% | 43% | 2.43 | ||
| 12 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 6 | LLWLLWL | 0.86 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.14 | 100% | 100% | 4.86 | ||
| 13 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 6 | WLLLDDD | 0.86 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 1.86 | 86% | 86% | 4.29 | ||
| 14 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 6 | LLLLWWL | 0.86 | 0% | 43% | 57% | 1.57 | 86% | 71% | 4.00 | ||
| 15 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 19 | -10 | 6 | LWLWLLL | 0.86 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.29 | 86% | 86% | 4.00 | ||
| 16 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 2 | DLLLDLL | 0.29 | 14% | 43% | 57% | 0.71 | 71% | 57% | 2.57 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Who Is in the Best Form in the Last 7 Games?
CSKA Moskva U19 leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 games.
Zenit U19 is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 86% and 2.71 PPG.
Almaz Antey U19 is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 86% and 2.57 PPG.
Rostov U19 is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 0% and 0.29 PPG.
Dinamo Moskva U19 is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 14% and 0.86 PPG.
Spartak Moskva U19 has the worst form over the last 7 games with just 14% wins and only 0.86 PPG.
- •The Youth Championship (Russia) Last 7 Games Form Table covers 16 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent games.
- •Win rate across the Youth Championship in this period is 45%
- •Teams score an average of 2.04 goals per game and concede 1.98 — a combined 4.02 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 65% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 20% of games.
Youth Championship (Russia) Last 7 Games — Form Table Insights
CSKA Moskva U19, Zenit U19 and Almaz Antey U19 have been the standout performers in the Youth Championship (Russia) over the last 7 games, leading the form table with 3.00, 2.71 and 2.57 PPG respectively. Across the Youth Championship, teams score an average of 2.04 goals and concede 1.98 per game — a combined 4.02 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 65% of fixtures while 20% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Rostov U19 and Dinamo Moskva U19 have struggled in recent games, collecting just 0.29 and 0.86 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the Youth Championship.
Home Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 7 | +25 | 21 | WWWWWWW | 3.00 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 4.57 | 100% | 100% | 5.57 | ||
| 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 6 | +22 | 21 | WWWWWWW | 3.00 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 4.00 | 100% | 86% | 4.86 | ||
| 3 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 7 | +22 | 19 | WWDWWWW | 2.71 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 4.14 | 100% | 100% | 5.14 | ||
| 4 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 5 | +14 | 16 | WWWLWWD | 2.29 | 57% | 14% | 43% | 2.71 | 86% | 86% | 3.43 | ||
| 5 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 25 | 16 | +9 | 16 | DLWWWWW | 2.29 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 3.57 | 100% | 100% | 5.86 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 6 | +9 | 15 | LWWWWWL | 2.14 | 57% | 14% | 29% | 2.14 | 86% | 71% | 3.00 | ||
| 7 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 10 | +6 | 13 | DWWWLLW | 1.86 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 2.29 | 86% | 71% | 3.71 | ||
| 8 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9 | +1 | 13 | WDLWWLW | 1.86 | 29% | 14% | 71% | 1.43 | 71% | 71% | 2.71 | ||
| 9 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 10 | +2 | 11 | WDWWDLL | 1.57 | 29% | 14% | 71% | 1.71 | 86% | 86% | 3.14 | ||
| 10 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 10 | WLLDWWL | 1.43 | 14% | 29% | 71% | 1.71 | 86% | 71% | 3.57 | ||
| 11 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 7 | +1 | 9 | DDLDLWW | 1.29 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.14 | 71% | 29% | 2.14 | ||
| 12 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 9 | LLWLWLW | 1.29 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.57 | 86% | 71% | 3.86 | ||
| 13 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 8 | LWLWDLD | 1.14 | 29% | 43% | 43% | 1.29 | 71% | 57% | 2.71 | ||
| 14 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 15 | -1 | 6 | WLLLDDD | 0.86 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.14 | ||
| 15 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 6 | LWLLLWL | 0.86 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.57 | 86% | 71% | 4.00 | ||
| 16 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 12 | 19 | -7 | 6 | LWLLLLW | 0.86 | 14% | 43% | 43% | 1.71 | 57% | 57% | 4.43 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms? (Last 7 Home Games)
Rodina Moscow U19 leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 home games.
CSKA Moskva U19 is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Zenit U19 is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 86% and 2.71 PPG.
Dinamo Moskva U19 is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 14% and 0.86 PPG.
Ural U20 is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 29% and 0.86 PPG.
Rubin Kazan U20 has the worst form over the last 7 home games with just 29% wins and only 0.86 PPG.
- •The Youth Championship (Russia) Home Form Table (Last 7) covers 16 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent home games.
- •Win rate across the Youth Championship in this period is 54%
- •Teams score an average of 2.35 goals per game and concede 1.54 — a combined 3.89 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 63% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 16% of games.
Youth Championship (Russia) — Home Form Table Insights (Last 7 Home Games)
Rodina Moscow U19, CSKA Moskva U19 and Zenit U19 have been the standout performers in the Youth Championship (Russia) over the last 7 home games, leading the form table with 3.00, 3.00 and 2.71 PPG respectively. Across the Youth Championship, teams score an average of 2.35 goals and concede 1.54 per game — a combined 3.89 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 63% of fixtures while 16% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Dinamo Moskva U19 and Ural U20 have struggled in recent home games, collecting just 0.86 and 0.86 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the Youth Championship.
Away Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 15 | +7 | 15 | WLWLWWW | 2.14 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 3.14 | 100% | 86% | 5.29 | ||
| 2 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 13 | +3 | 13 | LLWWWWD | 1.86 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 2.29 | 100% | 100% | 4.14 | ||
| 3 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 11 | +5 | 11 | WDDWWLL | 1.57 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 2.29 | 100% | 57% | 3.86 | ||
| 4 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 16 | -2 | 10 | WDWLLWL | 1.43 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 2.00 | 86% | 86% | 4.29 | ||
| 5 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 22 | -12 | 10 | LLDWWLW | 1.43 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.43 | 86% | 86% | 4.57 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 9 | LWWLLWL | 1.29 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 1.86 | 86% | 86% | 4.29 | ||
| 7 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 20 | -6 | 9 | LWWLLLW | 1.29 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 2.00 | 86% | 86% | 4.86 | ||
| 8 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 8 | WDLDLLW | 1.14 | 29% | 29% | 57% | 1.29 | 57% | 43% | 2.86 | ||
| 9 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 20 | -7 | 8 | LWLDWLD | 1.14 | 14% | 14% | 86% | 1.86 | 86% | 86% | 4.71 | ||
| 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 23 | -14 | 7 | LLWWLDL | 1.00 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.29 | 86% | 86% | 4.57 | ||
| 11 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 17 | -9 | 6 | LLLLWWL | 0.86 | 29% | 43% | 29% | 1.14 | 86% | 86% | 3.57 | ||
| 12 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 6 | LWLLLLW | 0.86 | 14% | 57% | 29% | 0.86 | 86% | 57% | 3.14 | ||
| 13 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 4 | LWLLLDL | 0.57 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 0.86 | 71% | 57% | 2.43 | ||
| 14 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 23 | -17 | 3 | LWLLLLL | 0.43 | 0% | 57% | 43% | 0.86 | 86% | 86% | 4.14 | ||
| 15 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 18 | -14 | 2 | LLDLLLD | 0.29 | 29% | 43% | 57% | 0.57 | 71% | 71% | 3.14 | ||
| 16 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 18 | -8 | 1 | DLLLLLL | 0.14 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.43 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms? (Last 7 Away Games)
CSKA Moskva U19 leads the form table with 71% wins and 2.14 PPG in the last 7 away games.
Zenit U19 is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 57% and 1.86 PPG.
Akademiya Konoplev U20 is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 43% and 1.57 PPG.
Chertanovo U20 is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.14 PPG.
Fakel U19 is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.29 PPG.
Nizhny Novgorod U19 has the worst form over the last 7 away games with just 14% wins and only 0.43 PPG.
- •The Youth Championship (Russia) Away Form Table (Last 7) covers 16 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent away games.
- •Win rate across the Youth Championship in this period is 32%
- •Teams score an average of 1.57 goals per game and concede 2.42 — a combined 3.99 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 65% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 24% of games.
Youth Championship (Russia) — Away Form Table Insights (Last 7 Away Games)
CSKA Moskva U19, Zenit U19 and Akademiya Konoplev U20 have been the standout performers in the Youth Championship (Russia) over the last 7 away games, leading the form table with 2.14, 1.86 and 1.57 PPG respectively. Across the Youth Championship, teams score an average of 1.57 goals and concede 2.42 per game — a combined 3.99 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 65% of fixtures while 24% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Chertanovo U20 and Fakel U19 have struggled in recent away games, collecting just 0.14 and 0.29 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the Youth Championship.
Form Tables — Russia
- Cup Form Table— Division Silver
- First League Form Table— Division Silver
- Premier League Form Table— Division Gold
- Second League - Group 1 Form Table— Division Regional
- Second League - Group 2 Form Table— Division Regional
- Second League - Group 3 Form Table— Division Regional
- Second League - Group 4 Form Table— Division Regional
- Second League A - Division A Gold Form Table— Division Regional
- Second League A - Division A Silver Form Table— Division Regional
- Second League A - Promotion Play-offs Form Table— Division Regional
- Second League A - Spring Season Gold Form Table— Division Regional
- Second League A - Spring Season Silver Form Table— Division Regional
- Super Cup Form Table— Division Gold
- Super Cup Women Form Table
- Supreme Division Women Form Table— Division Women's Pro