MatchPulse
A-League

A-League — xG (Expected Goals)

Australia · 2026/27

Expected Goals (xG)

xG data available for 3 games
#TeamMPxGFxGF/gxGAxGA/gGFGADiff
1Perth Glory35.61.863.81.2864+0.4
2Western Sydney Wanderers34.91.632.40.8152+0.1
3Central Coast Mariners34.91.634.91.6235-1.9
4Melbourne City34.51.513.51.1645-0.5
5Wellington Phoenix34.51.513.51.1671+2.5
6Newcastle Jets34.51.514.51.5136-1.5
7Melbourne Victory33.81.274.91.6234-0.8
8Brisbane Roar23.51.740.70.3532-0.5
9Auckland33.11.045.21.7467+2.9
10Sydney32.80.933.51.1633+0.2
11Macarthur32.80.935.21.7432+0.2
12Adelaide United22.11.044.92.4416-1.1
xGF = xG For (created)xGA = xG Against (conceded)Diff = GF − xGF (over/under-performing)
* xG estimated from shots on goal using the league's average conversion rate. API xG data is not available for this league.
xG Attack Ranking
Perth GloryHigh xGF1.86
Brisbane RoarHigh xGF1.74
MacarthurLow xGF0.93
SydneyLow xGF0.93
Adelaide UnitedLow xGF1.04

LEAGUE xG STATS

12 teams with xG data
League avg xGF/g: 1.38
League avg xGA/g: 1.38
Best overperformer: Auckland (+2.9)
Biggest underperformer: Central Coast Mariners (-1.9)

A-League (Australia) — Expected Goals (xG) Analysis

The A-League (Australia) averages 1.38 xG per game this season. Perth Glory creates the most chances with 1.86 xGF per game, while Macarthur creates the fewest with 0.93 xGF per game. Auckland is over-performing their xG (6 goals vs 3.1 xGF) — regression likely. Central Coast Mariners is under-performing (3 goals vs 4.9 xGF) — improvement expected.

Betting Angle — xG & Regression Markets

xG is the most powerful predictor of future performance — teams that consistently over-perform their xG (scoring more than expected) tend to regress. Look for under-performing high-xG teams as value opportunities in match result markets, especially Asian Handicap and Both Teams To Score.

Expected Goals (xG) — Australia