League One — Failed To Score
China · 2026
Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | FTS% | Home% | Away% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Hebei Kungfu | 29 | 12 | 41% | 33% | 50% |
| 2 |  Meizhou Kejia | 29 | 11 | 38% | 33% | 43% |
| 3 |  Suzhou Dongwu | 29 | 10 | 34% | 40% | 29% |
| 4 |  Shenzhen Juniors | 29 | 10 | 34% | 21% | 47% |
| 5 |  Dalian Huayi | 29 | 9 | 31% | 14% | 47% |
| 6 |  Nanjing City | 29 | 9 | 31% | 27% | 36% |
| 7 |  Dongguan United | 29 | 9 | 31% | 33% | 29% |
| 8 |  Yanbian Longding | 29 | 9 | 31% | 29% | 33% |
| 9 |  Ningbo Professional | 29 | 9 | 31% | 14% | 47% |
| 10 |  Wuxi Wugou | 29 | 8 | 28% | 29% | 27% |
| 11 |  Shaanxi Union | 29 | 7 | 24% | 14% | 33% |
| 12 |  Nantong Zhiyun | 29 | 6 | 21% | 7% | 33% |
| 13 |  Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 29 | 5 | 17% | 20% | 14% |
| 14 |  Guangxi Hengchen | 29 | 5 | 17% | 13% | 21% |
| 15 |  Changchun Yatai | 29 | 4 | 14% | 7% | 21% |
| 16 |  Guangzhou E-Power | 29 | 3 | 10% | 7% | 13% |
Home / Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Suzhou Dongwu | 15 | 6 | 40% |
| 2 | Meizhou Kejia | 15 | 5 | 33% |
| 3 | Dongguan United | 15 | 5 | 33% |
| 4 | Hebei Kungfu | 15 | 5 | 33% |
| 5 | Wuxi Wugou | 14 | 4 | 29% |
| 6 | Yanbian Longding | 14 | 4 | 29% |
| 7 | Nanjing City | 15 | 4 | 27% |
| 8 | Shenzhen Juniors | 14 | 3 | 21% |
| 9 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 15 | 3 | 20% |
| 10 | Dalian Huayi | 14 | 2 | 14% |
| 11 | Shaanxi Union | 14 | 2 | 14% |
| 12 | Ningbo Professional | 14 | 2 | 14% |
| 13 | Guangxi Hengchen | 15 | 2 | 13% |
| 14 | Changchun Yatai | 15 | 1 | 7% |
| 15 | Nantong Zhiyun | 14 | 1 | 7% |
| 16 | Guangzhou E-Power | 14 | 1 | 7% |
Away / Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hebei Kungfu | 14 | 7 | 50% |
| 2 | Dalian Huayi | 15 | 7 | 47% |
| 3 | Shenzhen Juniors | 15 | 7 | 47% |
| 4 | Ningbo Professional | 15 | 7 | 47% |
| 5 | Meizhou Kejia | 14 | 6 | 43% |
| 6 | Nanjing City | 14 | 5 | 36% |
| 7 | Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 5 | 33% |
| 8 | Yanbian Longding | 15 | 5 | 33% |
| 9 | Shaanxi Union | 15 | 5 | 33% |
| 10 | Suzhou Dongwu | 14 | 4 | 29% |
| 11 | Dongguan United | 14 | 4 | 29% |
| 12 | Wuxi Wugou | 15 | 4 | 27% |
| 13 | Changchun Yatai | 14 | 3 | 21% |
| 14 | Guangxi Hengchen | 14 | 3 | 21% |
| 15 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 14 | 2 | 14% |
| 16 | Guangzhou E-Power | 15 | 2 | 13% |
Which teams fail to score most often?
Hebei Kungfu fails to score most often in the league — 41%
Meizhou Kejia is #2 for failed-to-score rate — 38%
Suzhou Dongwu is #3 for failed-to-score rate — 34%
Guangzhou E-Power rarely fails to score — 10%
Changchun Yatai rarely fails to score — 14%
Guangxi Hengchen rarely fails to score — 17%
League Blank Stats
- consists of 16 teams
- League failed-to-score rate: 27%
- Home FTS rate: 22%
- Away FTS rate: 33%
League One (China) — Failed To Score Analysis
In the League One (China), teams fail to score in 54% of matches this season. Hebei Kungfu fails to score the most, going blank in 41% of their games (12 matches), with 33% at home and 50% away. Guangzhou E-Power has the most reliable attack, failing to score in only 10% of games.
Betting Angle — Low-Scoring Markets
A high failed-to-score rate is a strong signal for BTTS No, Under 1.5, and Clean Sheet markets when facing that team. When two high-FTS teams play each other, the Under 1.5 and even the 0-0 Correct Score become statistically viable bets.
Statistics Tables — China
- FA Cup Failed To Score— Division Gold
- League Two Failed To Score— Division Pro
- Super Cup Failed To Score— Division Premium
- Super League Failed To Score— Division Premium