La Liga — Card Stats
Spain · 2026/27
Yellow Cards — Match Total
| # | Team | MP | O 1.5 | O 2.5 | O 3.5 | O 4.5 | O 5.5 | O 6.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 5.8 | |
| 2 | 11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 73% | 55% | 27% | 5.5 | |
| 3 | 11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 73% | 36% | 18% | 5.0 | |
| 4 | 11 | 91% | 82% | 82% | 73% | 55% | 9% | 4.9 | |
| 5 | 11 | 91% | 91% | 73% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 4.7 | |
| 6 | 10 | 80% | 80% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 4.7 | |
| 7 | 11 | 91% | 91% | 82% | 55% | 36% | 0% | 4.5 | |
| 8 | 11 | 100% | 73% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 9% | 4.5 | |
| 9 | 11 | 100% | 91% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 18% | 4.5 | |
| 10 | 11 | 100% | 100% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 0% | 4.5 | |
| 11 | 11 | 100% | 91% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 0% | 4.4 | |
| 12 | 11 | 91% | 64% | 64% | 45% | 45% | 9% | 4.2 | |
| 13 | 10 | 90% | 80% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 4.0 | |
| 14 | 11 | 100% | 91% | 73% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 15 | 11 | 91% | 73% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 4.0 | |
| 16 | 11 | 100% | 82% | 45% | 45% | 9% | 9% | 3.9 | |
| 17 | 11 | 82% | 82% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 3.7 | |
| 18 | 11 | 100% | 73% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 3.6 | |
| 19 | 11 | 73% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 0% | 3.5 | |
| 20 | 11 | 91% | 64% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 3.2 |
Yellow Cards — Match Total
League avg
4.36
Most carded
5.8
Fewest carded
3.2
Yellow Cards per Match in La Liga 2026
Getafe leads La Liga with an average of 5.82 yellow cards per match across 11 fixtures — placing them at the top of the discipline table.
Espanyol (5.45) and Racing Santander (5.00) follow closely, with the trio averaging 5.42 combined. Their games consistently generate elevated card activity.
At the other end, Levante averages just 3.18 yellow cards per match — the lowest figure in the competition across 11 matches.
Disciplinary Market Insights
The La Liga averages 4.36 yellow cards per match as a league-wide baseline — a key reference for disciplinary betting markets.
The most active trio (Getafe, Espanyol, Racing Santander) averages 5.42 collectively, sitting 1.06 above the league mean. Fixtures involving these sides provide a structural edge in over-threshold card markets.
Yellow Cards For
| # | Team | MP | O 0.5 | O 1.5 | O 2.5 | O 3.5 | O 4.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | 100% | 91% | 73% | 45% | 9% | 3.3 | |
| 2 | 11 | 100% | 73% | 55% | 45% | 9% | 2.8 | |
| 3 | 11 | 100% | 82% | 55% | 27% | 9% | 2.7 | |
| 4 | 11 | 100% | 91% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 2.7 | |
| 5 | 11 | 100% | 100% | 45% | 9% | 9% | 2.6 | |
| 6 | 11 | 100% | 73% | 55% | 27% | 0% | 2.5 | |
| 7 | 10 | 100% | 70% | 50% | 20% | 10% | 2.5 | |
| 8 | 11 | 91% | 64% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 2.3 | |
| 9 | 11 | 100% | 82% | 36% | 9% | 0% | 2.3 | |
| 10 | 11 | 91% | 64% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 2.2 | |
| 11 | 11 | 100% | 73% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 2.1 | |
| 12 | 11 | 73% | 64% | 36% | 9% | 9% | 1.9 | |
| 13 | 11 | 100% | 64% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 1.9 | |
| 14 | 10 | 90% | 70% | 30% | 0% | 0% | 1.9 | |
| 15 | 11 | 82% | 55% | 36% | 9% | 0% | 1.8 | |
| 16 | 11 | 91% | 55% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 1.7 | |
| 17 | 11 | 91% | 64% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 1.7 | |
| 18 | 11 | 91% | 45% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 1.6 | |
| 19 | 11 | 73% | 55% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 1.6 | |
| 20 | 11 | 82% | 45% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 1.4 |
Yellow Cards For
League avg
2.18
Most carded
3.3
Fewest carded
1.4
Yellow Cards For — La Liga 2026
Getafe leads La Liga with an average of 3.27 yellow cards per match across 11 fixtures — placing them at the top of the discipline table.
Sevilla (2.82) and Espanyol (2.73) follow closely, with the trio averaging 2.94 combined. Their games consistently generate elevated card activity.
At the other end, Levante averages just 1.36 yellow cards per match — the lowest figure in the competition across 11 matches.
Disciplinary Market Insights
The La Liga averages 2.18 yellow cards per match as a league-wide baseline — a key reference for disciplinary betting markets.
The most active trio (Getafe, Sevilla, Espanyol) averages 2.94 collectively, sitting 0.76 above the league mean. Fixtures involving these sides provide a structural edge in over-threshold card markets.
Yellow Cards Against
| # | Team | MP | O 0.5 | O 1.5 | O 2.5 | O 3.5 | O 4.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | 91% | 82% | 64% | 27% | 18% | 2.8 | |
| 2 | 11 | 91% | 82% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 2.7 | |
| 3 | 11 | 100% | 73% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 2.5 | |
| 4 | 11 | 91% | 82% | 55% | 18% | 0% | 2.5 | |
| 5 | 11 | 91% | 73% | 55% | 18% | 0% | 2.4 | |
| 6 | 11 | 100% | 73% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 2.4 | |
| 7 | 11 | 100% | 64% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 2.3 | |
| 8 | 11 | 91% | 73% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 2.3 | |
| 9 | 11 | 100% | 82% | 36% | 9% | 0% | 2.3 | |
| 10 | 10 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 2.2 | |
| 11 | 11 | 100% | 64% | 55% | 0% | 0% | 2.2 | |
| 12 | 10 | 80% | 60% | 50% | 10% | 10% | 2.1 | |
| 13 | 11 | 100% | 73% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 2.1 | |
| 14 | 11 | 100% | 55% | 36% | 9% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 15 | 11 | 91% | 82% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 16 | 11 | 100% | 55% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 1.9 | |
| 17 | 11 | 91% | 82% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 1.9 | |
| 18 | 11 | 91% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 1.8 | |
| 19 | 11 | 91% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 1.7 | |
| 20 | 11 | 73% | 73% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 1.6 |
Yellow Cards Against
League avg
2.18
Most carded
2.8
Fewest carded
1.6
Yellow Cards Against — La Liga 2026
Villarreal leads La Liga with an average of 2.82 yellow cards conceded per match across 11 fixtures — placing them at the top of the discipline table.
Espanyol (2.73) and Getafe (2.55) follow closely, with the trio averaging 2.70 combined. Their games consistently generate elevated card activity.
At the other end, Atletico Madrid averages just 1.55 yellow cards conceded per match — the lowest figure in the competition across 11 matches.
Disciplinary Market Insights
The La Liga averages 2.18 yellow cards conceded per match as a league-wide baseline — a key reference for disciplinary betting markets.
The most active trio (Villarreal, Espanyol, Getafe) averages 2.70 collectively, sitting 0.52 above the league mean. Fixtures involving these sides provide a structural edge in over-threshold card markets.