MatchPulse
Como Cup

Como Cup — Failed To Score

World · 2026

World — Como Cup 2026 — Detailed Stats
Competition
Home & Away TablesForm TableHome AdvantageAway AdvantageDrawsPredictions
Goals
AVG TotalGoals ScoredGoals ConcededClean SheetsBTTSFailed To Score
Over/Under
Over 0.5 ~ 5.5 TablesUnder 0.5 ~ 5.5 Tables
More
1st Half Table2nd Half TableWinning / Losing at HT

Failed To Score

#TeamMPFTSFTS%Home%Away%
1Crystal Palace3267%50%100%
2Famalicao3267%50%100%
3Lens2150%100%0%
4Al Ula3133%100%0%
5Villarreal200%0%0%
6Como300%0%0%

Home / Failed To Score

#TeamMPFTS%
1Lens11100%
2Al Ula11100%
3Crystal Palace2150%
4Famalicao2150%
5Villarreal100%
6Como100%

Away / Failed To Score

#TeamMPFTS%
1Crystal Palace11100%
2Famalicao11100%
3Lens100%
4Villarreal100%
5Como200%
6Al Ula200%

Which teams fail to score most often?

Crystal Palace fails to score most often in the league — 67%

Famalicao is #2 for failed-to-score rate — 67%

Al Ula is #3 for failed-to-score rate — 33%

Como rarely fails to score — 0%

Al Ula rarely fails to score — 33%

Famalicao rarely fails to score — 67%

League Blank Stats

  • consists of 4 teams
  • League failed-to-score rate: 42%
  • Home FTS rate: 50%
  • Away FTS rate: 33%

Como Cup (World) — Failed To Score Analysis

In the Como Cup (World), teams fail to score in 83% of matches this season. Crystal Palace fails to score the most, going blank in 67% of their games (2 matches), with 50% at home and 100% away. Como has the most reliable attack, failing to score in only 0% of games.

Betting Angle — Low-Scoring Markets

A high failed-to-score rate is a strong signal for BTTS No, Under 1.5, and Clean Sheet markets when facing that team. When two high-FTS teams play each other, the Under 1.5 and even the 0-0 Correct Score become statistically viable bets.

Statistics Tables — World