MatchPulse
Copa De La Liga

Copa De La Liga2nd Half Table

Chile · 2026

NublenseLeader:Nublense15ptsLeague Avg:1.37 goalsCobresalHighest Avg:Cobresal (2.17)Union La CaleraLowest Avg:Union La Calera (0.63)

Overall / 2nd Half Table

#TeamMPW-D-LGFGAGDPtsLast 5 (2H)PPG (2H)CSBTTSFTS0.5+1.5+2.5+AVG
1NublenseNublense84-3-162+415
LWDWW
1.8875%13%38%75%25%0%1.00
2Universidad de ChileUniversidad de Chile63-3-051+412
WDWDD
2.0083%17%33%67%33%0%1.00
3Union La CaleraUnion La Calera82-6-041+312
WDDDD
1.5088%13%63%38%25%0%0.63
4O'HigginsO'Higgins83-3-286+212
WLLWD
1.5025%50%25%100%63%13%1.75
5Coquimbo UnidoCoquimbo Unido83-3-253+212
LDDDL
1.5063%13%50%75%25%0%1.00
6Everton de VinaEverton de Vina63-2-143+111
WLWDD
1.8367%17%33%83%33%0%1.17
7Colo ColoColo Colo62-3-152+39
DDWDW
1.5067%17%67%50%33%33%1.17
8PalestinoPalestino63-0-354+19
WWLLW
1.5050%17%33%100%33%17%1.50
9HuachipatoHuachipato62-3-132+19
DWWDL
1.5067%17%50%67%17%0%0.83
10U. CatolicaU. Catolica62-2-263+38
WLLDD
1.3350%17%50%83%33%17%1.50
11Universidad de ConcepcionUniversidad de Concepcion62-2-25508
DDWLW
1.3317%50%33%100%50%17%1.67
12A. ItalianoA. Italiano61-4-154+17
LWDDD
1.1733%50%33%83%67%0%1.50
13Deportes LimacheDeportes Limache60-3-326-43
LLDDL
0.5017%33%67%83%50%0%1.33
14CobresalCobresal60-3-3310-73
LDLDL
0.5017%50%50%83%83%33%2.17
15ConcepciónConcepción60-2-4310-72
DLLLL
0.330%50%50%100%83%33%2.17
16D. La SerenaD. La Serena60-2-418-72
DLLLD
0.3317%17%83%83%67%0%1.50

Copa De La Liga 2026 — 2nd Half Table

Nublense leads the Copa De La Liga second half table overall with 15 points from 8 games (4W-3D-1L), averaging 1.00 goals per game.

Universidad de Chile follows in second place with 12 points. The league average at second half overall is 1.37 goals per game, with Cobresal recording the highest average at 2.17.

NublenseLeader:Nublense8ptsLeague Avg:1.37 goalsU. CatolicaHighest Avg:U. Catolica (2.00)Union La CaleraLowest Avg:Union La Calera (0.50)

Home / 2nd Half Table

#TeamMPW-D-LGFGAGDPtsLast 5 (2H)PPG (2H)CSBTTSFTS0.5+1.5+2.5+AVG
1NublenseNublense42-2-041+38
WDWD
2.0075%25%25%75%50%0%1.25
2O'HigginsO'Higgins42-1-142+27
WLWD
1.7550%25%25%100%50%0%1.50
3Universidad de ChileUniversidad de Chile32-1-020+27
WDW
2.33100%0%33%67%0%0%0.67
4U. CatolicaU. Catolica32-0-151+46
WLW
2.0067%0%33%100%33%33%2.00
5Union La CaleraUnion La Calera41-3-020+26
DDWD
1.50100%0%75%25%25%0%0.50
6Universidad de ConcepcionUniversidad de Concepcion32-0-132+16
WLW
2.0033%33%33%100%33%33%1.67
7Everton de VinaEverton de Vina31-2-021+15
WDD
1.6767%33%33%67%33%0%1.00
8Colo ColoColo Colo31-1-131+24
WDL
1.3367%0%67%67%33%33%1.33
9Coquimbo UnidoCoquimbo Unido41-1-22204
LDLW
1.0050%0%75%75%25%0%1.00
10A. ItalianoA. Italiano30-3-03303
DDD
1.000%100%0%100%100%0%2.00
11PalestinoPalestino31-0-23303
WLL
1.0033%33%33%100%67%33%2.00
12CobresalCobresal30-3-02203
DDD
1.0033%67%33%67%67%0%1.33
13HuachipatoHuachipato30-2-112-12
DLD
0.6733%33%67%67%33%0%1.00
14ConcepciónConcepción30-1-224-21
DLL
0.330%67%33%100%67%33%2.00
15Deportes LimacheDeportes Limache30-1-213-21
LDL
0.330%33%67%100%33%0%1.33
16D. La SerenaD. La Serena30-1-204-41
DLL
0.3333%0%100%67%67%0%1.33

Copa De La Liga 2026 — Home 2nd Half Table

Nublense leads the Copa De La Liga second half table at home with 8 points from 4 games (2W-2D-0L), averaging 1.25 goals per game.

O'Higgins follows in second place with 7 points. The league average at second half at home is 1.37 goals per game, with U. Catolica recording the highest average at 2.00.

Coquimbo UnidoLeader:Coquimbo Unido8ptsLeague Avg:1.36 goalsCobresalHighest Avg:Cobresal (3.00)HuachipatoLowest Avg:Huachipato (0.67)

Away / 2nd Half Table

#TeamMPW-D-LGFGAGDPtsLast 5 (2H)PPG (2H)CSBTTSFTS0.5+1.5+2.5+AVG
1Coquimbo UnidoCoquimbo Unido42-2-031+28
DDWW
2.0075%25%25%75%25%0%1.00
2HuachipatoHuachipato32-1-020+27
WWD
2.33100%0%33%67%0%0%0.67
3NublenseNublense42-1-121+17
LWWD
1.7575%0%50%75%0%0%0.75
4Union La CaleraUnion La Calera41-3-021+16
WDDD
1.5075%25%50%50%25%0%0.75
5PalestinoPalestino32-0-121+16
WLW
2.0067%0%33%100%0%0%1.00
6Everton de VinaEverton de Vina32-0-12206
WLW
2.0067%0%33%100%33%0%1.33
7Universidad de ChileUniversidad de Chile31-2-031+25
DWD
1.6767%33%33%67%67%0%1.33
8Colo ColoColo Colo31-2-021+15
DDW
1.6767%33%67%33%33%33%1.00
9O'HigginsO'Higgins41-2-14405
LDWD
1.250%75%25%100%75%25%2.00
10A. ItalianoA. Italiano31-1-121+14
LWD
1.3367%0%67%67%33%0%1.00
11Universidad de ConcepcionUniversidad de Concepcion30-2-123-12
DDL
0.670%67%33%100%67%0%1.67
12U. CatolicaU. Catolica30-2-112-12
LDD
0.6733%33%67%67%33%0%1.00
13Deportes LimacheDeportes Limache30-2-113-22
LDD
0.6733%33%67%67%67%0%1.33
14D. La SerenaD. La Serena30-1-214-31
LDL
0.330%33%67%100%67%0%1.67
15ConcepciónConcepción30-1-216-51
LLD
0.330%33%67%100%100%33%2.33
16CobresalCobresal30-0-318-70
LLL
0.000%33%67%100%100%67%3.00

Copa De La Liga 2026 — Away 2nd Half Table

Coquimbo Unido leads the Copa De La Liga second half table away with 8 points from 4 games (2W-2D-0L), averaging 1.00 goals per game.

Huachipato follows in second place with 7 points. The league average at second half away is 1.36 goals per game, with Cobresal recording the highest average at 3.00.