1. Division — Home Advantage
Belarus · 2026
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +24% | +14% | +34% | 2.40/1.81 | |
| 2 | +17% | +25% | +9% | 1.63/1.47 | |
| 3 | +17% | +6% | +27% | 2.00/1.25 | |
| 4 | +14% | +5% | +24% | 2.60/1.69 | |
| 5 | +14% | +33% | -5% | 0.75/0.71 | |
| 6 | +9% | +21% | -2% | 1.00/0.50 | |
| 7 | +9% | +7% | +11% | 1.47/1.19 | |
| 8 | +7% | -7% | +20% | 1.13/0.87 | |
| 9 | +6% | +3% | +9% | 1.53/1.00 | |
| 10 | +4% | +12% | -3% | 2.20/1.81 | |
| 11 | +3% | -8% | +14% | 1.50/1.13 | |
| 12 | -2% | -1% | -4% | 1.25/1.47 | |
| 13 | -3% | -13% | +6% | 2.13/2.13 | |
| 14 | -5% | -9% | -2% | 1.56/1.87 | |
| 15 | -8% | -10% | -6% | 0.69/0.87 | |
| 16 | -9% | -6% | -13% | 1.33/1.29 | |
| 17 | -13% | -8% | -18% | 0.75/1.40 | |
| 18 | -32% | -36% | -28% | 0.60/1.69 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
1. Division (Belarus) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the 1. Division (Belarus), the average home win rate is 43% compared to 38% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. FC Slutsk shows the strongest home advantage, winning 80% of home games versus just 50% away (a difference of +30%). At the other end, Minsk II actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 13% versus 56% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +33% | 1.69 | 0.86 | |
| 2 | +25% | 2.13 | 1.27 | |
| 3 | +21% | 1.33 | 0.88 | |
| 4 | +14% | 3.00 | 2.25 | |
| 5 | +12% | 2.47 | 1.94 | |
| 6 | +7% | 1.93 | 1.69 | |
| 7 | +6% | 2.13 | 1.88 | |
| 8 | +5% | 2.07 | 1.88 | |
| 9 | +3% | 1.20 | 1.13 | |
| 10 | -1% | 1.38 | 1.40 | |
| 11 | -6% | 1.40 | 1.57 | |
| 12 | -7% | 0.93 | 1.07 | |
| 13 | -8% | 1.38 | 1.60 | |
| 14 | -8% | 1.13 | 1.33 | |
| 15 | -9% | 1.56 | 1.87 | |
| 16 | -10% | 1.25 | 1.53 | |
| 17 | -13% | 1.60 | 2.06 | |
| 18 | -36% | 0.93 | 2.00 |
1. Division (Belarus) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
BATE II has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the 1. Division (Belarus), netting 1.69 goals/match at home versus 0.86 away — a Scoring Advantage of +33%. In contrast, Minsk II scores more away (2.00/match) than at home (0.93/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -36% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +34% | 0.80 | 1.63 | |
| 2 | +27% | 1.07 | 1.88 | |
| 3 | +24% | 0.73 | 1.19 | |
| 4 | +20% | 1.07 | 1.60 | |
| 5 | +14% | 1.56 | 2.07 | |
| 6 | +11% | 1.47 | 1.81 | |
| 7 | +9% | 1.50 | 1.80 | |
| 8 | +9% | 1.20 | 1.44 | |
| 9 | +6% | 1.33 | 1.50 | |
| 10 | -2% | 2.60 | 2.50 | |
| 11 | -2% | 1.25 | 1.20 | |
| 12 | -3% | 1.20 | 1.13 | |
| 13 | -4% | 1.44 | 1.33 | |
| 14 | -5% | 2.44 | 2.21 | |
| 15 | -6% | 2.25 | 2.00 | |
| 16 | -13% | 1.67 | 1.29 | |
| 17 | -18% | 2.19 | 1.53 | |
| 18 | -28% | 2.47 | 1.38 |
1. Division (Belarus) — Home Defence Analysis
Niva has the best home defensive record in the 1. Division (Belarus), conceding just 0.80 goals/match at home compared to 1.63 away — a Defence Advantage of +34%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Minsk II concedes more at home (2.47/match) than away (1.38/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +30% | 0.47 | 0.25 | |
| 2 | +30% | 1.27 | 0.69 | |
| 3 | +27% | 0.63 | 0.36 | |
| 4 | +23% | 0.40 | 0.25 | |
| 5 | +22% | 0.94 | 0.60 | |
| 6 | +16% | 1.13 | 0.81 | |
| 7 | +13% | 0.73 | 0.56 | |
| 8 | +12% | 0.80 | 0.63 | |
| 9 | +12% | 0.80 | 0.63 | |
| 10 | +11% | 0.50 | 0.40 | |
| 11 | +11% | 1.40 | 1.13 | |
| 12 | -3% | 0.69 | 0.73 | |
| 13 | -3% | 0.69 | 0.73 | |
| 14 | -7% | 0.47 | 0.53 | |
| 15 | -17% | 0.38 | 0.53 | |
| 16 | -33% | 0.40 | 0.79 | |
| 17 | -36% | 0.38 | 0.80 | |
| 18 | -53% | 0.27 | 0.88 |
1. Division (Belarus) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Osipovichy has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 1. Division (Belarus), netting 0.47 goals/match at home versus 0.25 away — a Scoring Advantage of +30%. At the other end, Minsk II shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.27/match at home against 0.88 away (-53%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +34% | 0.56 | 1.13 | |
| 2 | +33% | 0.40 | 0.80 | |
| 3 | +27% | 0.53 | 0.94 | |
| 4 | +26% | 0.33 | 0.56 | |
| 5 | +21% | 0.53 | 0.81 | |
| 6 | +11% | 0.40 | 0.50 | |
| 7 | +10% | 0.87 | 1.06 | |
| 8 | +8% | 0.69 | 0.80 | |
| 9 | +6% | 0.33 | 0.38 | |
| 10 | +3% | 0.47 | 0.50 | |
| 11 | -1% | 0.81 | 0.80 | |
| 12 | -3% | 0.67 | 0.63 | |
| 13 | -3% | 0.53 | 0.50 | |
| 14 | -9% | 1.38 | 1.14 | |
| 15 | -10% | 0.81 | 0.67 | |
| 16 | -15% | 0.63 | 0.47 | |
| 17 | -34% | 0.73 | 0.36 | |
| 18 | -36% | 0.56 | 0.27 |
1. Division (Belarus) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Molodechno-DYuSSh 4 has the best home defensive record in the 1. Division (Belarus), conceding just 0.56 goals/match at home compared to 1.13 away — a Defence Advantage of +34%. Ostrovets FC struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.56/match at home versus 0.27 away (-36%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +36% | 1.06 | 0.50 | |
| 2 | +28% | 1.19 | 0.67 | |
| 3 | +17% | 1.60 | 1.13 | |
| 4 | +16% | 0.87 | 0.63 | |
| 5 | +12% | 1.00 | 0.79 | |
| 6 | +9% | 0.88 | 0.73 | |
| 7 | +3% | 1.13 | 1.06 | |
| 8 | +1% | 1.33 | 1.31 | |
| 9 | -2% | 1.20 | 1.25 | |
| 10 | -3% | 1.00 | 1.06 | |
| 11 | -3% | 0.75 | 0.80 | |
| 12 | -4% | 0.80 | 0.88 | |
| 13 | -7% | 0.47 | 0.53 | |
| 14 | -7% | 0.88 | 1.00 | |
| 15 | -12% | 0.69 | 0.87 | |
| 16 | -13% | 0.88 | 1.13 | |
| 17 | -26% | 0.67 | 1.13 | |
| 18 | -28% | 0.80 | 1.44 |
1. Division (Belarus) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, BATE II has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 1. Division (Belarus), netting 1.06 goals/match at home versus 0.50 away — a Scoring Advantage of +36%. At the other end, Lida shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.80/match at home against 1.44 away (-28%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +44% | 0.27 | 0.69 | |
| 2 | +35% | 0.67 | 1.38 | |
| 3 | +30% | 0.75 | 1.40 | |
| 4 | +22% | 0.40 | 0.63 | |
| 5 | +10% | 0.87 | 1.06 | |
| 6 | +10% | 0.88 | 1.07 | |
| 7 | +9% | 0.67 | 0.80 | |
| 8 | +8% | 0.63 | 0.73 | |
| 9 | +7% | 0.87 | 1.00 | |
| 10 | +3% | 0.93 | 1.00 | |
| 11 | 0% | 1.06 | 1.07 | |
| 12 | 0% | 0.93 | 0.93 | |
| 13 | -3% | 0.67 | 0.63 | |
| 14 | -9% | 1.44 | 1.20 | |
| 15 | -9% | 1.73 | 1.44 | |
| 16 | -17% | 0.94 | 0.67 | |
| 17 | -34% | 1.50 | 0.73 | |
| 18 | -41% | 1.80 | 0.75 |
1. Division (Belarus) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Niva has the best home defensive record in the 1. Division (Belarus), conceding just 0.27 goals/match at home compared to 0.69 away — a Defence Advantage of +44%. Minsk II struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.80/match at home versus 0.75 away (-41%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Belarus
- 2. Division Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- Coppa Home Advantage— Division SemiPro
- Premier League Home Advantage— Division Silver
- Reserve League Home Advantage— Division Academy
- Super Cup Home Advantage— Division Silver