AFC Challenge League — Winning / Losing at HT
World · 2026/27
Most Wins:Al Qadsia (67%)
Most Draws:Yangon United (100%)
Most Losses:Abu Muslim (100%)League Win Avg:24%Overall / Winning or Losing at Half-Time
| # | Team | MP | W - D - L (HT) | Win % | Draw % | Loss % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Al Qadsia | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 2 |  Manila Digger | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 3 |  Goa | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 4 |  Al Ansar | 3 | 2-0-1 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 5 |  Ahal | 3 | 2-0-1 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 6 |  Wathba | 4 | 2-2-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 7 |  Al Ittihad | 4 | 2-1-1 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 8 |  Al Nejmeh | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 9 |  Tainan City | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 10 |  Istiqlol | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 11 |  Shan United | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 12 |  Hang Yuen | 4 | 1-3-0 | 25% | 75% | 0% |
| 13 |  Paro | 4 | 1-1-2 | 25% | 25% | 50% |
| 14 |  Regar-TadAZ | 4 | 1-1-2 | 25% | 25% | 50% |
| 15 |  Kasuka | 4 | 1-1-2 | 25% | 25% | 50% |
| 16 | Yangon United | 3 | 0-3-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 17 |  Pusamania Borneo | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 18 |  Al Arabi | 3 | 0-1-2 | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 19 |  Maziya | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 20 |  Ezra | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 21 |  Fortis | 4 | 0-1-3 | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 22 |  Muras United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 23 |  Central Stallions | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 24 | Abu Muslim | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 25 |  Dordoi Bishkek | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 26 |  Bangladesh Police | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 27 |  Ulaanbaatar | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 28 |  Karketu Dili | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
AFC Challenge League 2026 — Winning & Losing at Half-Time
Al Qadsia leads AFC Challenge League in half-time wins overall with a 67% win rate (2W-1D-0L from 3 games). The league average win rate at half-time is 24%.
Yangon United draw the most at the break (100%), while Abu Muslim trail most often heading into the second half (100% loss rate). These patterns are key indicators for in-play and half-time betting markets.
Most Wins:Manila Digger (100%)Most Draws:Hang Yuen (100%)Most Losses:Dordoi Bishkek (100%)League Win Avg:36%Home / Winning or Losing at Half-Time
| # | Team | MP | Home W - D - L (HT) | Home Win % | Home Draw % | Home Loss % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manila Digger | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 | Ahal | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 | Al Nejmeh | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 | Al Qadsia | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 | Al Ansar | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 | Al Ittihad | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 7 | Istiqlol | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 8 | Tainan City | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 9 | Goa | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 10 | Kasuka | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 11 | Paro | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 12 | Hang Yuen | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 13 | Pusamania Borneo | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 14 | Al Arabi | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 15 | Yangon United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 16 | Shan United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 17 | Maziya | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 18 | Wathba | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 19 | Fortis | 3 | 0-1-2 | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 20 | Central Stallions | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 21 | Dordoi Bishkek | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 22 | Regar-TadAZ | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 23 | Ulaanbaatar | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
AFC Challenge League 2026 — Home Half-Time Results
Manila Digger leads AFC Challenge League in half-time wins at home with a 100% win rate (2W-0D-0L from 2 games). The league average win rate at half-time is 36%.
Hang Yuen draw the most at the break (100%), while Dordoi Bishkek trail most often heading into the second half (100% loss rate). These patterns are key indicators for in-play and half-time betting markets.
Most Wins:Goa (100%)Most Draws:Al Nejmeh (100%)Most Losses:Karketu Dili (100%)League Win Avg:17%Away / Winning or Losing at Half-Time
| # | Team | MP | Away W - D - L (HT) | Away Win % | Away Draw % | Away Loss % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Goa | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 | Wathba | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 3 | Hang Yuen | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 4 | Al Qadsia | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 5 | Shan United | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 6 | Al Ansar | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 7 | Regar-TadAZ | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 8 | Al Nejmeh | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 9 | Yangon United | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 10 | Manila Digger | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 11 | Muras United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 12 | Kasuka | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 13 | Ezra | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 14 | Paro | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 15 | Tainan City | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 16 | Karketu Dili | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 17 | Al Arabi | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 18 | Istiqlol | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 19 | Al Ittihad | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 20 | Ahal | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 21 | Bangladesh Police | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 22 | Fortis | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 23 | Abu Muslim | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 24 | Pusamania Borneo | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
AFC Challenge League 2026 — Away Half-Time Results
Goa leads AFC Challenge League in half-time wins away with a 100% win rate (1W-0D-0L from 1 games). The league average win rate at half-time is 17%.
Al Nejmeh draw the most at the break (100%), while Karketu Dili trail most often heading into the second half (100% loss rate). These patterns are key indicators for in-play and half-time betting markets.