Pro League A — Home Advantage
Uzbekistan · 2026
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +34% | +8% | +60% | 3.00/1.83 | |
| 2 | +26% | +38% | +15% | 2.08/1.58 | |
| 3 | +15% | +35% | -4% | 0.77/0.27 | |
| 4 | +14% | +21% | +7% | 1.25/1.00 | |
| 5 | +13% | +6% | +20% | 2.00/1.83 | |
| 6 | +5% | -8% | +18% | 2.17/1.85 | |
| 7 | +3% | -14% | +19% | 1.54/1.67 | |
| 8 | +2% | +4% | 0% | 1.25/0.77 | |
| 9 | -3% | 0% | -5% | 1.92/1.55 | |
| 10 | -9% | -24% | +7% | 0.00/0.36 | |
| 11 | -9% | -12% | -6% | 0.50/0.54 | |
| 12 | -20% | +19% | -59% | 1.55/1.92 | |
| 13 | -22% | -24% | -20% | 1.00/1.36 | |
| 14 | -22% | -43% | -1% | 1.17/2.15 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
Pro League A (Uzbekistan) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the Pro League A (Uzbekistan), the average home win rate is 42% compared to 38% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Aral shows the strongest home advantage, winning 100% of home games versus just 50% away (a difference of +50%). At the other end, Gazalkent actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 33% versus 62% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +38% | 2.38 | 1.08 | |
| 2 | +35% | 1.31 | 0.64 | |
| 3 | +21% | 1.42 | 0.92 | |
| 4 | +19% | 1.73 | 1.17 | |
| 5 | +8% | 2.17 | 1.83 | |
| 6 | +6% | 2.25 | 2.00 | |
| 7 | +4% | 1.25 | 1.15 | |
| 8 | 0% | 2.00 | 2.00 | |
| 9 | -8% | 1.50 | 1.77 | |
| 10 | -12% | 0.67 | 0.85 | |
| 11 | -14% | 1.38 | 1.83 | |
| 12 | -24% | 1.00 | 1.64 | |
| 13 | -24% | 0.44 | 0.73 | |
| 14 | -43% | 1.00 | 2.54 |
Pro League A (Uzbekistan) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
FarDu has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Pro League A (Uzbekistan), netting 2.38 goals/match at home versus 1.08 away — a Scoring Advantage of +38%. In contrast, Gazalkent scores more away (2.54/match) than at home (1.00/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -43% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +60% | 0.25 | 1.00 | |
| 2 | +20% | 0.67 | 1.00 | |
| 3 | +19% | 1.08 | 1.58 | |
| 4 | +18% | 0.75 | 1.08 | |
| 5 | +15% | 1.23 | 1.67 | |
| 6 | +7% | 1.33 | 1.54 | |
| 7 | +7% | 2.22 | 2.55 | |
| 8 | 0% | 1.92 | 1.92 | |
| 9 | -1% | 1.25 | 1.23 | |
| 10 | -4% | 2.54 | 2.36 | |
| 11 | -5% | 1.31 | 1.18 | |
| 12 | -6% | 2.42 | 2.15 | |
| 13 | -20% | 1.77 | 1.18 | |
| 14 | -59% | 1.64 | 0.42 |
Pro League A (Uzbekistan) — Home Defence Analysis
Aral has the best home defensive record in the Pro League A (Uzbekistan), conceding just 0.25 goals/match at home compared to 1.00 away — a Defence Advantage of +60%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Kattaqurgon concedes more at home (1.64/match) than away (0.42/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +67% | 0.85 | 0.17 | |
| 2 | +43% | 0.46 | 0.18 | |
| 3 | +31% | 0.58 | 0.31 | |
| 4 | +21% | 0.64 | 0.42 | |
| 5 | +9% | 1.00 | 0.83 | |
| 6 | +4% | 0.58 | 0.54 | |
| 7 | +4% | 0.83 | 0.77 | |
| 8 | -2% | 0.62 | 0.64 | |
| 9 | -10% | 0.25 | 0.31 | |
| 10 | -15% | 0.92 | 1.25 | |
| 11 | -24% | 0.11 | 0.18 | |
| 12 | -30% | 0.54 | 1.00 | |
| 13 | -37% | 0.38 | 0.83 | |
| 14 | -69% | 0.17 | 0.92 |
Pro League A (Uzbekistan) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, FarDu has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Pro League A (Uzbekistan), netting 0.85 goals/match at home versus 0.17 away — a Scoring Advantage of +67%. At the other end, Gazalkent shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.17/match at home against 0.92 away (-69%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.33 | |
| 2 | +64% | 0.08 | 0.38 | |
| 3 | +25% | 0.25 | 0.42 | |
| 4 | +10% | 0.89 | 1.09 | |
| 5 | +7% | 0.67 | 0.77 | |
| 6 | +6% | 0.75 | 0.85 | |
| 7 | +4% | 0.38 | 0.42 | |
| 8 | -2% | 0.69 | 0.67 | |
| 9 | -4% | 0.50 | 0.46 | |
| 10 | -9% | 0.92 | 0.77 | |
| 11 | -9% | 0.77 | 0.64 | |
| 12 | -17% | 1.15 | 0.82 | |
| 13 | -26% | 0.46 | 0.27 | |
| 14 | -69% | 0.91 | 0.17 |
Pro League A (Uzbekistan) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Aral has the best home defensive record in the Pro League A (Uzbekistan), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.33 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Kattaqurgon struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.91/match at home versus 0.17 away (-69%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +37% | 0.83 | 0.38 | |
| 2 | +36% | 1.25 | 0.58 | |
| 3 | +30% | 0.85 | 0.45 | |
| 4 | +25% | 1.54 | 0.92 | |
| 5 | +19% | 1.09 | 0.75 | |
| 6 | +3% | 1.25 | 1.17 | |
| 7 | +1% | 1.38 | 1.36 | |
| 8 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 9 | -12% | 0.67 | 0.85 | |
| 10 | -13% | 0.42 | 0.54 | |
| 11 | -16% | 0.46 | 0.64 | |
| 12 | -20% | 0.67 | 1.00 | |
| 13 | -24% | 0.33 | 0.55 | |
| 14 | -32% | 0.83 | 1.62 |
Pro League A (Uzbekistan) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Jayxun has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Pro League A (Uzbekistan), netting 0.83 goals/match at home versus 0.38 away — a Scoring Advantage of +37%. At the other end, Gazalkent shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.83/match at home against 1.62 away (-32%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +45% | 0.25 | 0.67 | |
| 2 | +30% | 0.54 | 1.00 | |
| 3 | +26% | 0.69 | 1.17 | |
| 4 | +17% | 0.42 | 0.58 | |
| 5 | +9% | 0.58 | 0.69 | |
| 6 | +5% | 1.38 | 1.55 | |
| 7 | +4% | 1.33 | 1.45 | |
| 8 | +2% | 0.67 | 0.69 | |
| 9 | +1% | 0.75 | 0.77 | |
| 10 | +1% | 0.54 | 0.55 | |
| 11 | -4% | 1.50 | 1.38 | |
| 12 | -4% | 1.25 | 1.15 | |
| 13 | -18% | 1.31 | 0.91 | |
| 14 | -49% | 0.73 | 0.25 |
Pro League A (Uzbekistan) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Aral has the best home defensive record in the Pro League A (Uzbekistan), conceding just 0.25 goals/match at home compared to 0.67 away — a Defence Advantage of +45%. Kattaqurgon struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.73/match at home versus 0.25 away (-49%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Uzbekistan
- Cup Home Advantage— Division Pro
- Super Cup Home Advantage— Division Pro
- Super League Home Advantage— Division Pro