Pro League A — Home Advantage
Uzbekistan · 2026
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +38% | +51% | +26% | 2.33/1.50 | |
| 2 | +34% | +67% | +2% | 0.78/0.00 | |
| 3 | +32% | +14% | +50% | 3.00/1.78 | |
| 4 | +19% | +13% | +25% | 1.78/1.60 | |
| 5 | +17% | +5% | +29% | 1.78/1.50 | |
| 6 | +14% | +22% | +5% | 1.40/1.11 | |
| 7 | +7% | -6% | +19% | 0.67/0.70 | |
| 8 | +6% | +13% | -1% | 0.67/0.40 | |
| 9 | +3% | -15% | +21% | 2.00/2.11 | |
| 10 | +2% | +10% | -5% | 1.33/1.00 | |
| 11 | -10% | -11% | -9% | 1.80/1.63 | |
| 12 | -12% | +22% | -45% | 1.78/1.70 | |
| 13 | -19% | -16% | -23% | 0.89/1.00 | |
| 14 | -32% | -60% | -4% | 0.80/2.33 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
Pro League A (Uzbekistan) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the Pro League A (Uzbekistan), the average home win rate is 44% compared to 38% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Aral shows the strongest home advantage, winning 100% of home games versus just 44% away (a difference of +56%). At the other end, Gazalkent actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 20% versus 67% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +67% | 1.11 | 0.22 | |
| 2 | +51% | 2.78 | 0.90 | |
| 3 | +22% | 1.40 | 0.89 | |
| 4 | +22% | 1.56 | 1.00 | |
| 5 | +14% | 2.20 | 1.67 | |
| 6 | +13% | 1.56 | 1.20 | |
| 7 | +13% | 0.78 | 0.60 | |
| 8 | +10% | 1.22 | 1.00 | |
| 9 | +5% | 2.22 | 2.00 | |
| 10 | -6% | 0.89 | 1.00 | |
| 11 | -11% | 1.70 | 2.13 | |
| 12 | -15% | 1.40 | 1.89 | |
| 13 | -16% | 1.00 | 1.38 | |
| 14 | -60% | 0.70 | 2.78 |
Pro League A (Uzbekistan) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
BuxDu has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Pro League A (Uzbekistan), netting 1.11 goals/match at home versus 0.22 away — a Scoring Advantage of +67%. In contrast, Gazalkent scores more away (2.78/match) than at home (0.70/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -60% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +50% | 0.30 | 0.89 | |
| 2 | +29% | 0.78 | 1.40 | |
| 3 | +26% | 1.00 | 1.70 | |
| 4 | +25% | 0.78 | 1.30 | |
| 5 | +21% | 0.80 | 1.22 | |
| 6 | +19% | 1.56 | 2.30 | |
| 7 | +5% | 1.20 | 1.33 | |
| 8 | +2% | 2.44 | 2.56 | |
| 9 | -1% | 2.22 | 2.20 | |
| 10 | -4% | 1.20 | 1.11 | |
| 11 | -5% | 1.78 | 1.60 | |
| 12 | -9% | 1.20 | 1.00 | |
| 13 | -23% | 2.00 | 1.25 | |
| 14 | -45% | 1.33 | 0.50 |
Pro League A (Uzbekistan) — Home Defence Analysis
Aral has the best home defensive record in the Pro League A (Uzbekistan), conceding just 0.30 goals/match at home compared to 0.89 away — a Defence Advantage of +50%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Kattaqurgon concedes more at home (1.33/match) than away (0.50/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +77% | 0.78 | 0.10 | |
| 2 | +54% | 0.67 | 0.20 | |
| 3 | +50% | 0.33 | 0.11 | |
| 4 | +30% | 0.56 | 0.30 | |
| 5 | +25% | 0.33 | 0.20 | |
| 6 | +18% | 1.00 | 0.70 | |
| 7 | +12% | 0.70 | 0.56 | |
| 8 | +5% | 0.44 | 0.40 | |
| 9 | +5% | 0.44 | 0.40 | |
| 10 | -2% | 0.60 | 0.63 | |
| 11 | -5% | 0.90 | 1.00 | |
| 12 | -5% | 0.70 | 0.78 | |
| 13 | -6% | 0.56 | 0.63 | |
| 14 | -80% | 0.10 | 0.89 |
Pro League A (Uzbekistan) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, FarDu has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Pro League A (Uzbekistan), netting 0.78 goals/match at home versus 0.10 away — a Scoring Advantage of +77%. At the other end, Gazalkent shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.10/match at home against 0.89 away (-80%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.22 | |
| 2 | +54% | 0.10 | 0.33 | |
| 3 | +34% | 0.44 | 0.90 | |
| 4 | +22% | 0.44 | 0.70 | |
| 5 | +22% | 0.44 | 0.70 | |
| 6 | +16% | 0.40 | 0.56 | |
| 7 | +15% | 0.67 | 0.90 | |
| 8 | +9% | 0.33 | 0.40 | |
| 9 | +9% | 0.67 | 0.80 | |
| 10 | +6% | 0.33 | 0.38 | |
| 11 | +5% | 0.60 | 0.67 | |
| 12 | 0% | 0.78 | 0.78 | |
| 13 | -23% | 0.80 | 0.50 | |
| 14 | -59% | 0.78 | 0.20 |
Pro League A (Uzbekistan) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Aral has the best home defensive record in the Pro League A (Uzbekistan), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.22 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Kattaqurgon struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.78/match at home versus 0.20 away (-59%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +75% | 0.78 | 0.11 | |
| 2 | +43% | 2.00 | 0.80 | |
| 3 | +35% | 0.70 | 0.33 | |
| 4 | +32% | 1.30 | 0.67 | |
| 5 | +18% | 1.00 | 0.70 | |
| 6 | +16% | 1.11 | 0.80 | |
| 7 | +5% | 0.44 | 0.40 | |
| 8 | -3% | 1.22 | 1.30 | |
| 9 | -15% | 0.44 | 0.60 | |
| 10 | -15% | 1.10 | 1.50 | |
| 11 | -18% | 0.56 | 0.80 | |
| 12 | -23% | 0.70 | 1.11 | |
| 13 | -26% | 0.44 | 0.75 | |
| 14 | -52% | 0.60 | 1.89 |
Pro League A (Uzbekistan) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, BuxDu has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Pro League A (Uzbekistan), netting 0.78 goals/match at home versus 0.11 away — a Scoring Advantage of +75%. At the other end, Gazalkent shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.60/match at home against 1.89 away (-52%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +46% | 0.33 | 0.90 | |
| 2 | +38% | 0.30 | 0.67 | |
| 3 | +35% | 0.33 | 0.70 | |
| 4 | +34% | 0.44 | 0.90 | |
| 5 | +12% | 0.70 | 0.89 | |
| 6 | +12% | 1.11 | 1.40 | |
| 7 | +11% | 0.40 | 0.50 | |
| 8 | +5% | 0.60 | 0.67 | |
| 9 | +3% | 1.67 | 1.78 | |
| 10 | -9% | 1.56 | 1.30 | |
| 11 | -18% | 0.80 | 0.56 | |
| 12 | -19% | 1.33 | 0.90 | |
| 13 | -30% | 0.56 | 0.30 | |
| 14 | -31% | 1.67 | 0.88 |
Pro League A (Uzbekistan) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, FarDu has the best home defensive record in the Pro League A (Uzbekistan), conceding just 0.33 goals/match at home compared to 0.90 away — a Defence Advantage of +46%. Respublika FA struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.67/match at home versus 0.88 away (-31%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Uzbekistan
- Cup Home Advantage— Division Pro
- Super Cup Home Advantage— Division Pro
- Super League Home Advantage— Division Pro