Premier League — Home Advantage
Bhutan · 2026
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Ugyen Academy | +54% | +100% | +8% | 0.00/0.25 |
| 2 |  Paro | +53% | +5% | +100% | 3.00/3.00 |
| 3 |  Tsirang | +13% | +29% | -3% | 0.50/1.00 |
| 4 |  Thimphu City | +7% | +3% | +11% | 3.00/2.50 |
| 5 |  Thimphu | +4% | +20% | -12% | 1.75/1.67 |
| 6 |  Drukpa | +1% | +2% | 0% | 0.83/1.00 |
| 7 |  Tensung | -14% | -41% | +13% | 0.00/0.80 |
| 8 |  Transport United | -16% | +14% | -45% | 2.00/2.40 |
| 9 |  Bhutan U19 | -19% | -50% | +12% | 0.33/0.40 |
| 10 |  RTC | -23% | -45% | 0% | 0.80/2.00 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
Premier League (Bhutan) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the Premier League (Bhutan), the average home win rate is 35% compared to 44% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Thimphu City shows the strongest home advantage, winning 100% of home games versus just 75% away (a difference of +25%). At the other end, RTC actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 20% versus 60% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ugyen Academy | +100% | 0.50 | 0.00 |
| 2 | Tsirang | +29% | 1.83 | 1.00 |
| 3 | Thimphu | +20% | 1.50 | 1.00 |
| 4 | Transport United | +14% | 2.40 | 1.80 |
| 5 | Paro | +5% | 5.00 | 4.50 |
| 6 | Thimphu City | +3% | 4.00 | 3.75 |
| 7 | Drukpa | +2% | 1.83 | 1.75 |
| 8 | Tensung | -41% | 0.50 | 1.20 |
| 9 | RTC | -45% | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| 10 | Bhutan U19 | -50% | 0.67 | 2.00 |
Premier League (Bhutan) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
Ugyen Academy has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Premier League (Bhutan), netting 0.50 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. In contrast, Bhutan U19 scores more away (2.00/match) than at home (0.67/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -50% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paro | +100% | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| 2 | Tensung | +13% | 2.75 | 3.60 |
| 3 | Bhutan U19 | +12% | 2.67 | 3.40 |
| 4 | Thimphu City | +11% | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| 5 | Ugyen Academy | +8% | 3.83 | 4.50 |
| 6 | RTC | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 7 | Drukpa | 0% | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| 8 | Tsirang | -3% | 2.67 | 2.50 |
| 9 | Thimphu | -12% | 1.50 | 1.17 |
| 10 | Transport United | -45% | 1.60 | 0.60 |
Premier League (Bhutan) — Home Defence Analysis
Paro has the best home defensive record in the Premier League (Bhutan), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.83 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Transport United concedes more at home (1.60/match) than away (0.60/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ugyen Academy | +100% | 0.33 | 0.00 |
| 2 | Tsirang | +68% | 1.33 | 0.25 |
| 3 | Transport United | +67% | 1.00 | 0.20 |
| 4 | Thimphu | +38% | 0.75 | 0.33 |
| 5 | Thimphu City | -5% | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| 6 | Paro | -14% | 2.00 | 2.67 |
| 7 | Tensung | -23% | 0.25 | 0.40 |
| 8 | Drukpa | -50% | 0.17 | 0.50 |
| 9 | Bhutan U19 | -66% | 0.33 | 1.60 |
| 10 | RTC | -100% | 0.00 | 0.40 |
Premier League (Bhutan) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Ugyen Academy has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Premier League (Bhutan), netting 0.33 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, RTC shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.00/match at home against 0.40 away (-100%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paro | +100% | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| 2 | Bhutan U19 | +41% | 0.67 | 1.60 |
| 3 | RTC | +33% | 0.40 | 0.80 |
| 4 | Ugyen Academy | +9% | 1.67 | 2.00 |
| 5 | Transport United | 0% | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| 6 | Tensung | -2% | 1.25 | 1.20 |
| 7 | Thimphu City | -23% | 0.40 | 0.25 |
| 8 | Thimphu | -33% | 1.00 | 0.50 |
| 9 | Drukpa | -33% | 1.00 | 0.50 |
| 10 | Tsirang | -45% | 1.33 | 0.50 |
Premier League (Bhutan) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Paro has the best home defensive record in the Premier League (Bhutan), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.50 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Tsirang struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.33/match at home versus 0.50 away (-45%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ugyen Academy | +100% | 0.17 | 0.00 |
| 2 | Paro | +24% | 3.00 | 1.83 |
| 3 | Drukpa | +14% | 1.67 | 1.25 |
| 4 | Thimphu City | +11% | 2.20 | 1.75 |
| 5 | Thimphu | +6% | 0.75 | 0.67 |
| 6 | Transport United | -7% | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| 7 | Bhutan U19 | -9% | 0.33 | 0.40 |
| 8 | Tsirang | -20% | 0.50 | 0.75 |
| 9 | RTC | -33% | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| 10 | Tensung | -52% | 0.25 | 0.80 |
Premier League (Bhutan) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Ugyen Academy has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Premier League (Bhutan), netting 0.17 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Tensung shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.25/match at home against 0.80 away (-52%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paro | +100% | 0.00 | 0.33 |
| 2 | Thimphu City | +30% | 0.40 | 0.75 |
| 3 | Tensung | +23% | 1.50 | 2.40 |
| 4 | Tsirang | +20% | 1.33 | 2.00 |
| 5 | Drukpa | +20% | 1.00 | 1.50 |
| 6 | Thimphu | +14% | 0.50 | 0.67 |
| 7 | Ugyen Academy | +7% | 2.17 | 2.50 |
| 8 | Bhutan U19 | -5% | 2.00 | 1.80 |
| 9 | RTC | -50% | 0.60 | 0.20 |
| 10 | Transport United | -100% | 1.00 | 0.00 |
Premier League (Bhutan) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Paro has the best home defensive record in the Premier League (Bhutan), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.33 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Transport United struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.00/match at home versus 0.00 away (-100%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Bhutan
- Super League Home Advantage— Division Underground