GFA League — Beide Teams Treffen
Gambia · 2025/26
Beide Teams Treffen (BTTS)
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | BTTS% | Heim% | Ausw.% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | 17 | 57% | 33% | 80% | |
| 2 | 30 | 16 | 53% | 53% | 53% | |
| 3 | 30 | 16 | 53% | 47% | 60% | |
| 4 | 30 | 15 | 50% | 53% | 47% | |
| 5 | 30 | 14 | 47% | 47% | 47% | |
| 6 | 30 | 13 | 43% | 27% | 60% | |
| 7 | 30 | 13 | 43% | 53% | 33% | |
| 8 | 30 | 13 | 43% | 40% | 47% | |
| 9 | 30 | 13 | 43% | 53% | 33% | |
| 10 | 30 | 12 | 40% | 33% | 47% | |
| 11 | 30 | 12 | 40% | 53% | 27% | |
| 12 | 30 | 11 | 37% | 40% | 33% | |
| 13 | 30 | 11 | 37% | 40% | 33% | |
| 14 | 30 | 11 | 37% | 53% | 20% | |
| 15 | 30 | 8 | 27% | 33% | 20% | |
| 16 | 30 | 7 | 23% | 13% | 33% |
Heim / BTTS
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | 8 | 53% | |
| 2 | 15 | 8 | 53% | |
| 3 | 15 | 8 | 53% | |
| 4 | 15 | 8 | 53% | |
| 5 | 15 | 8 | 53% | |
| 6 | 15 | 8 | 53% | |
| 7 | 15 | 7 | 47% | |
| 8 | 15 | 7 | 47% | |
| 9 | 15 | 6 | 40% | |
| 10 | 15 | 6 | 40% | |
| 11 | 15 | 6 | 40% | |
| 12 | 15 | 5 | 33% | |
| 13 | 15 | 5 | 33% | |
| 14 | 15 | 5 | 33% | |
| 15 | 15 | 4 | 27% | |
| 16 | 15 | 2 | 13% |
Ausw. / BTTS
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | 12 | 80% | |
| 2 | 15 | 9 | 60% | |
| 3 | 15 | 9 | 60% | |
| 4 | 15 | 8 | 53% | |
| 5 | 15 | 7 | 47% | |
| 6 | 15 | 7 | 47% | |
| 7 | 15 | 7 | 47% | |
| 8 | 15 | 7 | 47% | |
| 9 | 15 | 5 | 33% | |
| 10 | 15 | 5 | 33% | |
| 11 | 15 | 5 | 33% | |
| 12 | 15 | 5 | 33% | |
| 13 | 15 | 5 | 33% | |
| 14 | 15 | 4 | 27% | |
| 15 | 15 | 3 | 20% | |
| 16 | 15 | 3 | 20% |
Welche Teams haben die meisten BTTS-Spiele?
Hart Acedemy hat die höchste BTTS-Rate der Liga — 57%
Brikama United ist #2 bei der BTTS-Rate — 53%
Bombada ist #3 bei der BTTS-Rate — 53%
GPA hat eine der niedrigsten BTTS-Raten — 23%
Falcons hat eine der niedrigsten BTTS-Raten — 27%
Dutch Lions hat eine der niedrigsten BTTS-Raten — 37%
Liga BTTS-Statistiken
- hat 16 Teams
- Liga BTTS-Quote: 42%
- Heim BTTS-Quote: 42%
- Ausw. BTTS-Quote: 42%
1. Halbzeit — BTTS-Quote
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % | Heim% | Ausw.% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | 7 | 23% | 13% | 33% | |
| 2 | 30 | 7 | 23% | 27% | 20% | |
| 3 | 30 | 6 | 20% | 33% | 7% | |
| 4 | 30 | 5 | 17% | 7% | 27% | |
| 5 | 30 | 5 | 17% | 13% | 20% | |
| 6 | 30 | 5 | 17% | 13% | 20% | |
| 7 | 30 | 5 | 17% | 13% | 20% | |
| 8 | 30 | 4 | 13% | 13% | 13% | |
| 9 | 30 | 4 | 13% | 27% | 0% | |
| 10 | 30 | 4 | 13% | 13% | 13% | |
| 11 | 30 | 3 | 10% | 13% | 7% | |
| 12 | 30 | 3 | 10% | 0% | 20% | |
| 13 | 30 | 3 | 10% | 13% | 7% | |
| 14 | 30 | 3 | 10% | 13% | 7% | |
| 15 | 30 | 2 | 7% | 0% | 13% | |
| 16 | 30 | 2 | 7% | 13% | 0% |
Heim / BTTS 1H
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | 5 | 33% | |
| 2 | 15 | 4 | 27% | |
| 3 | 15 | 4 | 27% | |
| 4 | 15 | 2 | 13% | |
| 5 | 15 | 2 | 13% | |
| 6 | 15 | 2 | 13% | |
| 7 | 15 | 2 | 13% | |
| 8 | 15 | 2 | 13% | |
| 9 | 15 | 2 | 13% | |
| 10 | 15 | 2 | 13% | |
| 11 | 15 | 2 | 13% | |
| 12 | 15 | 2 | 13% | |
| 13 | 15 | 2 | 13% | |
| 14 | 15 | 1 | 7% | |
| 15 | 15 | 0 | 0% | |
| 16 | 15 | 0 | 0% |
Ausw. / BTTS 1H
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | 5 | 33% | |
| 2 | 15 | 4 | 27% | |
| 3 | 15 | 3 | 20% | |
| 4 | 15 | 3 | 20% | |
| 5 | 15 | 3 | 20% | |
| 6 | 15 | 3 | 20% | |
| 7 | 15 | 3 | 20% | |
| 8 | 15 | 2 | 13% | |
| 9 | 15 | 2 | 13% | |
| 10 | 15 | 2 | 13% | |
| 11 | 15 | 1 | 7% | |
| 12 | 15 | 1 | 7% | |
| 13 | 15 | 1 | 7% | |
| 14 | 15 | 1 | 7% | |
| 15 | 15 | 0 | 0% | |
| 16 | 15 | 0 | 0% |
BTTS-Insights — 1H
Greater Tomorrow hat die höchste BTTS-Rate in 1H — 23%
Dutch Lions ist #2 bei BTTS in 1H — 23%
Medina United ist #3 bei BTTS in 1H — 20%
Samger hat selten BTTS in 1H — 7%
GPA hat selten BTTS in 1H — 7%
Falcons hat selten BTTS in 1H — 10%
BTTS-STATS — 1H
- 16 Teams
- Liga BTTS-Quote 1H: 14%
- Heim BTTS-Quote 1H: 14%
- Ausw. BTTS-Quote 1H: 14%
- Teams BTTS 1H ≥20%: 19% (3/16)
2. Halbzeit — BTTS-Quote
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % | Heim% | Ausw.% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | 11 | 37% | 27% | 47% | |
| 2 | 30 | 9 | 30% | 40% | 20% | |
| 3 | 30 | 9 | 30% | 33% | 27% | |
| 4 | 30 | 8 | 27% | 20% | 33% | |
| 5 | 30 | 7 | 23% | 27% | 20% | |
| 6 | 30 | 6 | 20% | 7% | 33% | |
| 7 | 30 | 6 | 20% | 20% | 20% | |
| 8 | 30 | 6 | 20% | 33% | 7% | |
| 9 | 30 | 5 | 17% | 20% | 13% | |
| 10 | 30 | 4 | 13% | 7% | 20% | |
| 11 | 30 | 4 | 13% | 13% | 13% | |
| 12 | 30 | 3 | 10% | 0% | 20% | |
| 13 | 30 | 3 | 10% | 13% | 7% | |
| 14 | 30 | 3 | 10% | 20% | 0% | |
| 15 | 30 | 3 | 10% | 7% | 13% | |
| 16 | 30 | 1 | 3% | 7% | 0% |
Heim / BTTS 2H
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | 6 | 40% | |
| 2 | 15 | 5 | 33% | |
| 3 | 15 | 5 | 33% | |
| 4 | 15 | 4 | 27% | |
| 5 | 15 | 4 | 27% | |
| 6 | 15 | 3 | 20% | |
| 7 | 15 | 3 | 20% | |
| 8 | 15 | 3 | 20% | |
| 9 | 15 | 3 | 20% | |
| 10 | 15 | 2 | 13% | |
| 11 | 15 | 2 | 13% | |
| 12 | 15 | 1 | 7% | |
| 13 | 15 | 1 | 7% | |
| 14 | 15 | 1 | 7% | |
| 15 | 15 | 1 | 7% | |
| 16 | 15 | 0 | 0% |
Ausw. / BTTS 2H
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | 7 | 47% | |
| 2 | 15 | 5 | 33% | |
| 3 | 15 | 5 | 33% | |
| 4 | 15 | 4 | 27% | |
| 5 | 15 | 3 | 20% | |
| 6 | 15 | 3 | 20% | |
| 7 | 15 | 3 | 20% | |
| 8 | 15 | 3 | 20% | |
| 9 | 15 | 3 | 20% | |
| 10 | 15 | 2 | 13% | |
| 11 | 15 | 2 | 13% | |
| 12 | 15 | 2 | 13% | |
| 13 | 15 | 1 | 7% | |
| 14 | 15 | 1 | 7% | |
| 15 | 15 | 0 | 0% | |
| 16 | 15 | 0 | 0% |
BTTS-Insights — 2H
Hart Acedemy hat die höchste BTTS-Rate in 2H — 37%
Brikama United ist #2 bei BTTS in 2H — 30%
Bombada ist #3 bei BTTS in 2H — 30%
TMT hat selten BTTS in 2H — 3%
Falcons hat selten BTTS in 2H — 10%
Greater Tomorrow hat selten BTTS in 2H — 10%
BTTS-STATS — 2H
- 16 Teams
- Liga BTTS-Quote 2H: 18%
- Heim BTTS-Quote 2H: 18%
- Ausw. BTTS-Quote 2H: 18%
- Teams BTTS 2H ≥40%: 0% (0/16)
GFA League (Gambia) — Analyse BTTS (Beide Teams Treffen)
In der GFA League (Gambia) treffen beide Teams in 84% der Spiele. Hart Acedemy hat die höchste BTTS-Rate mit 57% (17 Spiele). GPA hat die niedrigste Rate mit 23%.
Wett-Tipp — BTTS-Märkte
BTTS Ja ist am zuverlässigsten, wenn zwei Teams mit hoher BTTS-Rate aufeinandertreffen. Gegen ein Team mit niedriger BTTS-Rate sollte man BTTS Nein in Betracht ziehen. Immer mit Daten zu kassierten Toren kombinieren.