Oberliga - Bayern Süd — Halbzeittabelle 2. Hälfte
Germany · 2026/27
Germany — Oberliga - Bayern Süd 2026/27 — Detailstatistiken
Spitzenreiter:Pipinsried — 32ptsLiga Ø:1.84 goals
Höchster Ø:1860 München II (2.38)
Niedrigster Ø:Erlbach (1.19)Gesamt / 2. Halbzeit-Tabelle
| # | Team | MP | S-U-N | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Letzte 5 (2H) | PPSp (2H) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pipinsried | 16 | 10-2-4 | 26 | 11 | +15 | 32 | LWWLW | 2.00 | 44% | 31% | 31% | 94% | 63% | 38% | 2.31 |
| 2 | 1860 München II | 16 | 7-4-5 | 22 | 16 | +6 | 25 | WLDWD | 1.56 | 38% | 38% | 38% | 88% | 63% | 50% | 2.38 |
| 3 |  1880 Wasserburg | 16 | 6-7-3 | 21 | 15 | +6 | 25 | DWDWW | 1.56 | 38% | 56% | 13% | 94% | 75% | 31% | 2.25 |
| 4 | Erlbach | 16 | 6-6-4 | 12 | 7 | +5 | 24 | DLWDL | 1.50 | 56% | 19% | 50% | 75% | 31% | 6% | 1.19 |
| 5 |  Gundelfingen | 16 | 7-3-6 | 13 | 11 | +2 | 24 | LLWLD | 1.50 | 44% | 25% | 44% | 88% | 31% | 19% | 1.50 |
| 6 |  Sportfreunde Schwaig | 16 | 5-8-3 | 18 | 9 | +9 | 23 | WWDDW | 1.44 | 44% | 38% | 38% | 81% | 63% | 19% | 1.69 |
| 7 |  Landshut | 16 | 5-8-3 | 18 | 14 | +4 | 23 | DLDDD | 1.44 | 38% | 63% | 25% | 75% | 69% | 38% | 2.00 |
| 8 |  Pfaffenhofen | 16 | 5-8-3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 23 | WWDWD | 1.44 | 50% | 38% | 44% | 69% | 44% | 25% | 1.50 |
| 9 |  Deisenhofen | 16 | 6-5-5 | 14 | 19 | -5 | 23 | LWLLD | 1.44 | 50% | 31% | 44% | 75% | 56% | 38% | 2.06 |
| 10 |  Hankofen-Hailing | 16 | 6-4-6 | 14 | 11 | +3 | 22 | WLWDL | 1.38 | 50% | 19% | 44% | 88% | 50% | 13% | 1.56 |
| 11 |  Ismaning | 16 | 5-7-4 | 16 | 14 | +2 | 22 | DWDWD | 1.38 | 31% | 44% | 38% | 88% | 56% | 25% | 1.88 |
| 12 |  Schwabmünchen | 16 | 5-6-5 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 21 | DWDWL | 1.31 | 44% | 44% | 25% | 88% | 50% | 31% | 2.13 |
| 13 |  Heimstetten | 16 | 3-9-4 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 18 | DLDDW | 1.13 | 25% | 56% | 31% | 88% | 63% | 19% | 1.75 |
| 14 |  1860 Rosenheim | 16 | 4-6-6 | 10 | 19 | -9 | 18 | WWLLL | 1.13 | 38% | 31% | 44% | 88% | 69% | 25% | 1.81 |
| 15 |  Kottern | 16 | 3-8-5 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 17 | DLDDW | 1.06 | 50% | 25% | 69% | 56% | 38% | 25% | 1.25 |
| 16 |  Kirchanschöring | 16 | 2-7-7 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 13 | LDDWL | 0.81 | 38% | 38% | 56% | 69% | 50% | 31% | 1.63 |
| 17 |  TuS Geretsried | 16 | 2-6-8 | 10 | 20 | -10 | 12 | LLLLD | 0.75 | 38% | 31% | 56% | 75% | 63% | 31% | 1.88 |
| 18 |  Schalding-Heining | 16 | 2-6-8 | 12 | 26 | -14 | 12 | DDLLD | 0.75 | 25% | 38% | 50% | 88% | 69% | 38% | 2.38 |
Oberliga - Bayern Süd 2026 — 2. Halbzeit-Tabelle
Pipinsried führt die Oberliga - Bayern Süd-Tabelle der zweiten Halbzeit gesamt mit 32 Punkten aus 16 Spielen (10S-2U-4N) an, mit einem Schnitt von 2.31 Toren pro Spiel.
1860 München II folgt auf Platz 2 mit 25 Punkten. Der Ligaschnitt beträgt 1.84 Tore pro Spiel, mit 1860 München II als höchstem Wert (2.38).
Spitzenreiter:Pipinsried — 17ptsLiga Ø:1.84 goalsHöchster Ø:Schalding-Heining (3.13)Niedrigster Ø:Gundelfingen (1.00)Heim / 2. Halbzeit-Tabelle
| # | Team | MP | S-U-N | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Letzte 5 (2H) | PPSp (2H) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pipinsried | 8 | 5-2-1 | 13 | 4 | +9 | 17 | WLWWD | 2.13 | 50% | 38% | 25% | 88% | 50% | 38% | 2.13 |
| 2 | 1860 München II | 8 | 5-1-2 | 13 | 4 | +9 | 16 | WWLWL | 2.00 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 100% | 50% | 38% | 2.13 |
| 3 | Erlbach | 8 | 4-3-1 | 10 | 4 | +6 | 15 | DWLWW | 1.88 | 50% | 38% | 25% | 88% | 63% | 13% | 1.75 |
| 4 | Sportfreunde Schwaig | 9 | 3-5-1 | 9 | 3 | +6 | 14 | WWDDW | 1.56 | 67% | 22% | 44% | 67% | 56% | 11% | 1.33 |
| 5 | Schwabmünchen | 8 | 4-2-2 | 13 | 10 | +3 | 14 | WWLDW | 1.75 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 63% | 50% | 2.88 |
| 6 | Gundelfingen | 8 | 4-1-3 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 13 | LWDWW | 1.63 | 63% | 0% | 50% | 88% | 13% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 7 | Ismaning | 8 | 2-6-0 | 12 | 8 | +4 | 12 | DDDDW | 1.50 | 25% | 75% | 13% | 88% | 88% | 38% | 2.50 |
| 8 | Landshut | 8 | 3-3-2 | 11 | 8 | +3 | 12 | LDDWL | 1.50 | 25% | 75% | 13% | 88% | 75% | 50% | 2.38 |
| 9 | 1880 Wasserburg | 8 | 3-3-2 | 10 | 7 | +3 | 12 | DDWDW | 1.50 | 38% | 50% | 13% | 100% | 75% | 25% | 2.13 |
| 10 | Pfaffenhofen | 8 | 3-3-2 | 6 | 4 | +2 | 12 | WWDWL | 1.50 | 63% | 25% | 50% | 63% | 25% | 25% | 1.25 |
| 11 | 1860 Rosenheim | 8 | 3-2-3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 11 | WLLWD | 1.38 | 50% | 25% | 38% | 88% | 63% | 25% | 1.75 |
| 12 | Kottern | 8 | 1-6-1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 9 | DDDWD | 1.13 | 63% | 38% | 63% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 1.00 |
| 13 | Deisenhofen | 7 | 2-3-2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 9 | LDWLD | 1.29 | 71% | 14% | 57% | 57% | 43% | 14% | 1.43 |
| 14 | Hankofen-Hailing | 8 | 2-2-4 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 8 | LDLLD | 1.00 | 38% | 25% | 50% | 88% | 38% | 13% | 1.38 |
| 15 | Kirchanschöring | 8 | 1-4-3 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 | LDLDW | 0.88 | 38% | 38% | 50% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 1.50 |
| 16 | Heimstetten | 8 | 1-3-4 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 6 | LDLDL | 0.75 | 25% | 38% | 50% | 88% | 50% | 25% | 1.75 |
| 17 | Schalding-Heining | 8 | 1-2-5 | 8 | 17 | -9 | 5 | DLLDL | 0.63 | 25% | 38% | 50% | 88% | 88% | 63% | 3.13 |
| 18 | TuS Geretsried | 8 | 0-4-4 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 4 | LLLDD | 0.50 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 75% | 75% | 25% | 1.75 |
Oberliga - Bayern Süd 2026 — Heim 2. Halbzeit-Tabelle
Pipinsried führt die Oberliga - Bayern Süd-Tabelle der zweiten Halbzeit zu Hause mit 17 Punkten aus 8 Spielen (5S-2U-1N) an, mit einem Schnitt von 2.13 Toren pro Spiel.
1860 München II folgt auf Platz 2 mit 16 Punkten. Der Ligaschnitt beträgt 1.84 Tore pro Spiel, mit Schalding-Heining als höchstem Wert (3.13).
Spitzenreiter:Pipinsried — 15ptsLiga Ø:1.84 goalsHöchster Ø:1860 München II (2.63)Niedrigster Ø:Erlbach (0.63)Auswärts / 2. Halbzeit-Tabelle
| # | Team | MP | S-U-N | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Letzte 5 (2H) | PPSp (2H) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pipinsried | 8 | 5-0-3 | 13 | 7 | +6 | 15 | LWWLW | 1.88 | 38% | 25% | 38% | 100% | 75% | 38% | 2.50 |
| 2 | Hankofen-Hailing | 8 | 4-2-2 | 9 | 5 | +4 | 14 | WWDDW | 1.75 | 63% | 13% | 38% | 88% | 63% | 13% | 1.75 |
| 3 | Deisenhofen | 9 | 4-2-3 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 14 | LWLWD | 1.56 | 33% | 44% | 33% | 89% | 67% | 56% | 2.56 |
| 4 | 1880 Wasserburg | 8 | 3-4-1 | 11 | 8 | +3 | 13 | WWWLD | 1.63 | 38% | 63% | 13% | 88% | 75% | 38% | 2.38 |
| 5 | Heimstetten | 8 | 2-6-0 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 12 | DDWDW | 1.50 | 25% | 75% | 13% | 88% | 75% | 13% | 1.75 |
| 6 | Landshut | 8 | 2-5-1 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 11 | DDWDD | 1.38 | 50% | 50% | 38% | 63% | 63% | 25% | 1.63 |
| 7 | Gundelfingen | 8 | 3-2-3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 | LLWLD | 1.38 | 25% | 50% | 38% | 88% | 50% | 38% | 2.00 |
| 8 | Pfaffenhofen | 8 | 2-5-1 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 11 | WDDDD | 1.38 | 38% | 50% | 38% | 75% | 63% | 25% | 1.75 |
| 9 | Ismaning | 8 | 3-1-4 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 10 | WWDLL | 1.25 | 38% | 13% | 63% | 88% | 25% | 13% | 1.25 |
| 10 | Sportfreunde Schwaig | 7 | 2-3-2 | 9 | 6 | +3 | 9 | DWLWL | 1.29 | 14% | 57% | 29% | 100% | 71% | 29% | 2.14 |
| 11 | Erlbach | 8 | 2-3-3 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 9 | LDWLD | 1.13 | 63% | 0% | 75% | 63% | 0% | 0% | 0.63 |
| 12 | 1860 München II | 8 | 2-3-3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 9 | LDDDL | 1.13 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 75% | 75% | 63% | 2.63 |
| 13 | TuS Geretsried | 8 | 2-2-4 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 8 | LLDLD | 1.00 | 50% | 13% | 63% | 75% | 50% | 38% | 2.00 |
| 14 | Kottern | 8 | 2-2-4 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 8 | LDWLL | 1.00 | 38% | 13% | 75% | 75% | 38% | 25% | 1.50 |
| 15 | Schwabmünchen | 8 | 1-4-3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 7 | DDLLW | 0.88 | 38% | 38% | 50% | 75% | 38% | 13% | 1.38 |
| 16 | Schalding-Heining | 8 | 1-4-3 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 7 | DLDWL | 0.88 | 25% | 38% | 50% | 88% | 50% | 13% | 1.63 |
| 17 | 1860 Rosenheim | 8 | 1-4-3 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 7 | WLDDL | 0.88 | 25% | 38% | 50% | 88% | 75% | 25% | 1.88 |
| 18 | Kirchanschöring | 8 | 1-3-4 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 6 | DWLLL | 0.75 | 38% | 38% | 63% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 1.75 |
Oberliga - Bayern Süd 2026 — Auswärts 2. Halbzeit-Tabelle
Pipinsried führt die Oberliga - Bayern Süd-Tabelle der zweiten Halbzeit auswärts mit 15 Punkten aus 8 Spielen (5S-0U-3N) an, mit einem Schnitt von 2.50 Toren pro Spiel.
Hankofen-Hailing folgt auf Platz 2 mit 14 Punkten. Der Ligaschnitt beträgt 1.84 Tore pro Spiel, mit 1860 München II als höchstem Wert (2.63).