Second League - Group 4 — Beide Teams Treffen
Russia · 2026/27
Beide Teams Treffen (BTTS)
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | BTTS% | Heim% | Ausw.% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Ural II | 31 | 22 | 71% | 63% | 80% |
| 2 |  Akron II | 31 | 20 | 65% | 47% | 81% |
| 3 |  Izhevsk | 31 | 20 | 65% | 63% | 67% |
| 4 |  Dinamo Barnaul | 31 | 19 | 61% | 60% | 63% |
| 5 |  Pobeda Nizhniy Novgorod | 31 | 19 | 61% | 75% | 47% |
| 6 |  Orenburg II | 30 | 18 | 60% | 60% | 60% |
| 7 |  Rubin Kazan 2 | 31 | 18 | 58% | 60% | 56% |
| 8 |  Khimik Dzerzhinsk | 30 | 16 | 53% | 60% | 47% |
| 9 |  Krylya Sovetov II | 30 | 15 | 50% | 53% | 47% |
| 10 |  KDV | 31 | 15 | 48% | 44% | 53% |
| 11 |  Nosta | 30 | 14 | 47% | 47% | 47% |
| 12 |  Chelyabinsk II | 31 | 12 | 39% | 47% | 31% |
Heim / BTTS
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pobeda Nizhniy Novgorod | 16 | 12 | 75% |
| 2 | Ural II | 16 | 10 | 63% |
| 3 | Izhevsk | 16 | 10 | 63% |
| 4 | Dinamo Barnaul | 15 | 9 | 60% |
| 5 | Orenburg II | 15 | 9 | 60% |
| 6 | Khimik Dzerzhinsk | 15 | 9 | 60% |
| 7 | Rubin Kazan 2 | 15 | 9 | 60% |
| 8 | Krylya Sovetov II | 15 | 8 | 53% |
| 9 | Nosta | 15 | 7 | 47% |
| 10 | Akron II | 15 | 7 | 47% |
| 11 | Chelyabinsk II | 15 | 7 | 47% |
| 12 | KDV | 16 | 7 | 44% |
Ausw. / BTTS
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Akron II | 16 | 13 | 81% |
| 2 | Ural II | 15 | 12 | 80% |
| 3 | Izhevsk | 15 | 10 | 67% |
| 4 | Dinamo Barnaul | 16 | 10 | 63% |
| 5 | Orenburg II | 15 | 9 | 60% |
| 6 | Rubin Kazan 2 | 16 | 9 | 56% |
| 7 | KDV | 15 | 8 | 53% |
| 8 | Nosta | 15 | 7 | 47% |
| 9 | Krylya Sovetov II | 15 | 7 | 47% |
| 10 | Khimik Dzerzhinsk | 15 | 7 | 47% |
| 11 | Pobeda Nizhniy Novgorod | 15 | 7 | 47% |
| 12 | Chelyabinsk II | 16 | 5 | 31% |
Welche Teams haben die meisten BTTS-Spiele?
Ural II hat die höchste BTTS-Rate der Liga — 71%
Akron II ist #2 bei der BTTS-Rate — 65%
Izhevsk ist #3 bei der BTTS-Rate — 65%
Chelyabinsk II hat eine der niedrigsten BTTS-Raten — 39%
Nosta hat eine der niedrigsten BTTS-Raten — 47%
KDV hat eine der niedrigsten BTTS-Raten — 48%
Liga BTTS-Statistiken
- hat 12 Teams
- Liga BTTS-Quote: 57%
- Heim BTTS-Quote: 57%
- Ausw. BTTS-Quote: 57%
1. Halbzeit — BTTS-Quote
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % | Heim% | Ausw.% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orenburg II | 30 | 12 | 40% | 53% | 27% |
| 2 | Ural II | 31 | 12 | 39% | 38% | 40% |
| 3 | Dinamo Barnaul | 31 | 9 | 29% | 33% | 25% |
| 4 | Izhevsk | 31 | 9 | 29% | 25% | 33% |
| 5 | Pobeda Nizhniy Novgorod | 31 | 9 | 29% | 44% | 13% |
| 6 | Akron II | 31 | 8 | 26% | 20% | 31% |
| 7 | Rubin Kazan 2 | 31 | 7 | 23% | 13% | 31% |
| 8 | Nosta | 30 | 6 | 20% | 7% | 33% |
| 9 | Krylya Sovetov II | 30 | 6 | 20% | 27% | 13% |
| 10 | Chelyabinsk II | 31 | 6 | 19% | 27% | 13% |
| 11 | Khimik Dzerzhinsk | 30 | 4 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| 12 | KDV | 31 | 4 | 13% | 0% | 27% |
Heim / BTTS 1H
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orenburg II | 15 | 8 | 53% |
| 2 | Pobeda Nizhniy Novgorod | 16 | 7 | 44% |
| 3 | Ural II | 16 | 6 | 38% |
| 4 | Dinamo Barnaul | 15 | 5 | 33% |
| 5 | Krylya Sovetov II | 15 | 4 | 27% |
| 6 | Chelyabinsk II | 15 | 4 | 27% |
| 7 | Izhevsk | 16 | 4 | 25% |
| 8 | Akron II | 15 | 3 | 20% |
| 9 | Khimik Dzerzhinsk | 15 | 2 | 13% |
| 10 | Rubin Kazan 2 | 15 | 2 | 13% |
| 11 | Nosta | 15 | 1 | 7% |
| 12 | KDV | 16 | 0 | 0% |
Ausw. / BTTS 1H
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ural II | 15 | 6 | 40% |
| 2 | Nosta | 15 | 5 | 33% |
| 3 | Izhevsk | 15 | 5 | 33% |
| 4 | Rubin Kazan 2 | 16 | 5 | 31% |
| 5 | Akron II | 16 | 5 | 31% |
| 6 | Orenburg II | 15 | 4 | 27% |
| 7 | KDV | 15 | 4 | 27% |
| 8 | Dinamo Barnaul | 16 | 4 | 25% |
| 9 | Krylya Sovetov II | 15 | 2 | 13% |
| 10 | Khimik Dzerzhinsk | 15 | 2 | 13% |
| 11 | Chelyabinsk II | 16 | 2 | 13% |
| 12 | Pobeda Nizhniy Novgorod | 15 | 2 | 13% |
BTTS-Insights — 1H
Orenburg II hat die höchste BTTS-Rate in 1H — 40%
Ural II ist #2 bei BTTS in 1H — 39%
Dinamo Barnaul ist #3 bei BTTS in 1H — 29%
KDV hat selten BTTS in 1H — 13%
Khimik Dzerzhinsk hat selten BTTS in 1H — 13%
Chelyabinsk II hat selten BTTS in 1H — 19%
BTTS-STATS — 1H
- 12 Teams
- Liga BTTS-Quote 1H: 25%
- Heim BTTS-Quote 1H: 25%
- Ausw. BTTS-Quote 1H: 25%
- Teams BTTS 1H ≥20%: 75% (9/12)
2. Halbzeit — BTTS-Quote
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % | Heim% | Ausw.% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Akron II | 31 | 13 | 42% | 33% | 50% |
| 2 | Pobeda Nizhniy Novgorod | 31 | 12 | 39% | 44% | 33% |
| 3 | Khimik Dzerzhinsk | 30 | 10 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 4 | Ural II | 31 | 10 | 32% | 31% | 33% |
| 5 | Izhevsk | 31 | 10 | 32% | 19% | 47% |
| 6 | Rubin Kazan 2 | 31 | 9 | 29% | 40% | 19% |
| 7 | KDV | 31 | 9 | 29% | 31% | 27% |
| 8 | Orenburg II | 30 | 8 | 27% | 20% | 33% |
| 9 | Dinamo Barnaul | 31 | 8 | 26% | 27% | 25% |
| 10 | Chelyabinsk II | 31 | 6 | 19% | 13% | 25% |
| 11 | Nosta | 30 | 5 | 17% | 27% | 7% |
| 12 | Krylya Sovetov II | 30 | 4 | 13% | 20% | 7% |
Heim / BTTS 2H
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pobeda Nizhniy Novgorod | 16 | 7 | 44% |
| 2 | Rubin Kazan 2 | 15 | 6 | 40% |
| 3 | Khimik Dzerzhinsk | 15 | 5 | 33% |
| 4 | Akron II | 15 | 5 | 33% |
| 5 | Ural II | 16 | 5 | 31% |
| 6 | KDV | 16 | 5 | 31% |
| 7 | Dinamo Barnaul | 15 | 4 | 27% |
| 8 | Nosta | 15 | 4 | 27% |
| 9 | Krylya Sovetov II | 15 | 3 | 20% |
| 10 | Orenburg II | 15 | 3 | 20% |
| 11 | Izhevsk | 16 | 3 | 19% |
| 12 | Chelyabinsk II | 15 | 2 | 13% |
Ausw. / BTTS 2H
| # | Team | Sp | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Akron II | 16 | 8 | 50% |
| 2 | Izhevsk | 15 | 7 | 47% |
| 3 | Ural II | 15 | 5 | 33% |
| 4 | Orenburg II | 15 | 5 | 33% |
| 5 | Khimik Dzerzhinsk | 15 | 5 | 33% |
| 6 | Pobeda Nizhniy Novgorod | 15 | 5 | 33% |
| 7 | KDV | 15 | 4 | 27% |
| 8 | Dinamo Barnaul | 16 | 4 | 25% |
| 9 | Chelyabinsk II | 16 | 4 | 25% |
| 10 | Rubin Kazan 2 | 16 | 3 | 19% |
| 11 | Nosta | 15 | 1 | 7% |
| 12 | Krylya Sovetov II | 15 | 1 | 7% |
BTTS-Insights — 2H
Akron II hat die höchste BTTS-Rate in 2H — 42%
Pobeda Nizhniy Novgorod ist #2 bei BTTS in 2H — 39%
Khimik Dzerzhinsk ist #3 bei BTTS in 2H — 33%
Krylya Sovetov II hat selten BTTS in 2H — 13%
Nosta hat selten BTTS in 2H — 17%
Chelyabinsk II hat selten BTTS in 2H — 19%
BTTS-STATS — 2H
- 12 Teams
- Liga BTTS-Quote 2H: 28%
- Heim BTTS-Quote 2H: 28%
- Ausw. BTTS-Quote 2H: 28%
- Teams BTTS 2H ≥40%: 8% (1/12)
Second League - Group 4 (Russia) — Analyse BTTS (Beide Teams Treffen)
In der Second League - Group 4 (Russia) treffen beide Teams in 113% der Spiele. Ural II hat die höchste BTTS-Rate mit 71% (22 Spiele). Chelyabinsk II hat die niedrigste Rate mit 39%.
Wett-Tipp — BTTS-Märkte
BTTS Ja ist am zuverlässigsten, wenn zwei Teams mit hoher BTTS-Rate aufeinandertreffen. Gegen ein Team mit niedriger BTTS-Rate sollte man BTTS Nein in Betracht ziehen. Immer mit Daten zu kassierten Toren kombinieren.
Statistik-Tabellen — Russia
- Cup BTTS— Division Silver
- First League BTTS— Division Silver
- Premier League BTTS— Division Gold
- Second League - Group 1 BTTS— Division Regional
- Second League - Group 2 BTTS— Division Regional
- Second League - Group 3 BTTS— Division Regional
- Second League A - Division A Gold BTTS— Division Regional
- Second League A - Division A Silver BTTS— Division Regional
- Second League A - Promotion Play-offs BTTS— Division Regional
- Second League A - Spring Season Gold BTTS— Division Regional
- Second League A - Spring Season Silver BTTS— Division Regional
- Super Cup BTTS— Division Gold
- Super Cup Women BTTS
- Supreme Division Women BTTS— Division Women's Pro
- Youth Championship BTTS— Division Academy