MatchPulse
AFC Champions League Two

AFC Champions League Two — xG (Erwartete Tore)

World · 2026/27

Erwartete Tore (xG)

xG-Daten verfügbar für 2 Spiele
#TeamSpxGFxGF/SxGAxGA/SGTGGDiff
1Al-Jazira24.12.051.00.4921-2.1
2Machida Zelvia12.72.700.10.1430+0.3
3East Bengal II12.62.65——86+5.4
4Al Kuwait12.52.461.01.0254+2.5
5Gangwon FC12.32.300.90.8912-1.3
6Al Seeb12.32.271.41.4404-2.3
7Muharraq22.21.111.80.9121-0.2
8Arkadag22.11.083.51.7652+2.9
9Nasaf11.81.780.80.7812-0.8
10Persib Bandung11.71.740.70.6830+1.3
11Al-Rayyan SC11.61.650.60.6455+3.4
12Al Faisaly11.61.621.51.5054+3.4
13Al-Nahda11.51.501.61.6213-0.5
14Home United11.51.460.50.4721+0.5
15Al Hussein11.41.442.32.2752+3.6
16Melbourne Victory11.41.430.80.8541+2.6
17Adelaide United11.41.391.31.2551+3.6
18BG Pathum United11.31.251.41.3923+0.8
19Svay Rieng11.21.160.30.3102-1.2
20Kuching FA11.01.030.90.9323+1
21Khalidiya11.01.022.52.46130
22Kitchee10.90.931.01.0311+0.1
23Phnom Penh Crown10.90.892.32.3042+3.1
24FC Seoul10.80.851.41.4304-0.8
25Al Wahda FC10.80.781.81.7853+4.2
26Viettel10.70.681.71.7412+0.3
27Al Taawon10.60.641.61.6532+2.4
28Gol Gohar20.60.322.81.4002-0.6
29Wofoo Tai Po10.50.471.51.4604-0.5
30Shanghai Shenhua10.30.311.21.1621+1.7
31Tampines Rovers10.10.142.72.7013+0.9
xGF = xG For (created)xGA = xG Against (conceded)Diff = GF − xGF (over/under-performing)
xG-Angriffs-Ranking
Machida ZelviaHoch xGF2.70
East Bengal IIHoch xGF2.65
Al KuwaitHoch xGF2.46
Tampines RoversNiedrig xGF0.14
Shanghai ShenhuaNiedrig xGF0.31
Gol GoharNiedrig xGF0.32

LIGA xG-STATS

31 Teams mit xG-Daten
Liga-Ø xGF/Sp: 1.33
Liga-Ø xGA/Sp: 1.24
Bester Überperformer: East Bengal II (+5.3)
Größter Underperformer: Al Seeb (-2.3)

Erwartete Tore (xG) — World